Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:40:14.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revenge can be more fully understood by making distinctions between anger and hatred

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Aaron N. Sell
Aaron N. Sell*
Affiliation:
School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Mt. Gravatt Campus, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia. sell@psych.ucsb.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

McCullough et al. present a compelling case that anger-based revenge is designed to disincentivize the target from imposing costs on the vengeful individual. Here I present a contrast between revenge motivated by anger (as discussed in the target article) and revenge motivated by hatred, which remains largely unexplored in the literature.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 36 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lachs, M. & Pillemer, K. (2004) Elder abuse. Lancet 364:1263–72.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Sell, A., Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2010) Evolutionary psychology and criminal justice: A recalibrational theory of punishment and reconciliation. In: Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives, ed. Høgh-Olesen, H., pp. 72–131. Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillemer, K. & Finkelhor, D. (1988) The Prevalence of elder abuse: A random sample survey. The Gerontologist 28(1):51–57.Google Scholar
Schopler, J. & Compere, J. (1971) Effects of being kind or harsh to another on liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 20(2):155–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, A. (2011) The recalibrational theory and violent anger. Aggression and Violent Behavior 16(5):381–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, A., Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2009) Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106(35):15073–78.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D. & Sznycer, D. (2008) Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. In: Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation, ed. Elliott, A., pp. 251–72. Erlbaum/Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Waller, J. (2004) Our ancestral shadow: Hate and human nature in evolutionary psychology. Paper presented at the Conference to Establish the Field of Hate Studies, Spokane, WA, March 19, 2004. [Conference held at Gonzaga University and organized by the Institute for Action against Hate.]Google Scholar
Westcott, H. & Jones, D. (1999) Annotation: The abuse of disabled children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 40(4):497–506.Google Scholar