Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:19:03.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protein utilisation and intermediary metabolism of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) as a function of protein:lipid ratio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2012

Pedro Borges
Affiliation:
CIMAR/CIIMAR, Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental and ICBAS, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Rua dos Bragas, 289, 4050-123 Porto, Portugal INRA-UR 1067 Nutrition Métabolisme, Aquaculture, Pôle Hydrobiologie, 64310 Saint Pée-sur-Nivelle, France
Françoise Medale
Affiliation:
INRA-UR 1067 Nutrition Métabolisme, Aquaculture, Pôle Hydrobiologie, 64310 Saint Pée-sur-Nivelle, France
Jorge Dias
Affiliation:
CIMAR/CCMAR, Centro de Ciências do Mar do Algarve, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Luísa M. P. Valente*
Affiliation:
CIMAR/CIIMAR, Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental and ICBAS, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Rua dos Bragas, 289, 4050-123 Porto, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author: L. M. P. Valente, fax +351 223401838, email lvalente@icbas.up.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous experiments with Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) have demonstrated that dietary lipid levels above 8 % impaired growth and did not promote protein retention. We hypothesised that this low ability to use high-lipid diets may depend on the dietary protein level. In the present study, a 2 × 2 factorial design was applied where two dietary lipid (4–17 % DM) and two dietary protein (below and above the requirement levels, 48 and 54 % DM) levels were tested in juveniles for 114 d. Growth performance was not improved by the increase in dietary fat, irrespectively of the dietary protein levels. Protein retention was similar among the diets, although fish fed the diets with high lipid content resulted in significantly lower protein gain. Among the enzymes involved in amino acid catabolism, only aspartate aminotransferase activity in the liver was affected by the dietary lipid levels, being stimulated in fish fed high-lipid diets. Moreover, phosphofructokinase 1 activity was significantly elevated in the muscle of Senegalese sole fed 4 % lipid diets, suggesting enhanced glycolysis in the muscle when the dietary lipid supply was limited and dietary starch increased. The results confirmed that high-lipid diets do not enhance growth, and data from the selected enzymes support the assumption that lipids are not efficiently used for energy production and protein sparing, even when dietary protein is below the protein requirement of the species. Furthermore, data suggest a significant role of glucose as the energy source in Senegalese sole.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

The balance between dietary protein and energy has a major impact on protein utilisation(Reference Bureau, Kaushik, Cho, John and Ronald1, Reference Kaushik2), affecting the ratio between protein oxidation (energy) and synthesis (growth). It also determines body reserve storage that varies depending on the respective proportions of macronutrients supplied by the diet. Dietary lipids appear to be a more efficient non-protein energy source for fish than carbohydrates, especially in salmonids and other carnivorous species. Besides their higher energy value and their high digestibility, dietary lipids are generally preferentially oxidised compared with carbohydrate sources(Reference Kolditz, Borthaire and Richard3, Reference Sargent and Tacon4). Consequently, over the past decades, the use of high-lipid diets in fish aquaculture has become a common practice due to the role of dietary lipids as a non-protein energy source, enhancing growth, protein retention and reducing organic matter and N losses(Reference Kaushik2, Reference Lee and Putnam5). However, previous studies have indicated that the lipid metabolism of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) differed from the general trend.

Senegalese sole is a marine fish with high protein requirements, a feature shared with most of the marine fish species, especially flatfish(Reference Lee, Park and Bang6Reference Hamre, Øfsti and Næss11). According to Rema et al. (Reference Rema, Conceicao and Evers9), at a fixed dietary lipid level of 12 %, Senegalese sole diets should include a high crude protein level (53 % DM) to maintain good overall growth performance. In flatfish species, a protein-sparing effect of dietary lipids has been observed in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)(Reference Bromley12) and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus)(Reference Helland and Grisdale-Helland13); however, in Senegalese sole, increasing the lipid levels from 11 to 21 %(Reference Dias, Rueda-Jasso and Panserat14) did not improve growth. Borges et al. (Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15) has recently demonstrated a low lipid tolerance of Senegalese sole, and recommended a dietary lipid inclusion up to 8 % for optimal growth and feed utilisation efficiency at a protein level of 57 % (DM basis). We hypothesised that the low ability to use high-lipid diets may depend on the dietary protein level, with dietary protein at high levels (above 50 % DM basis) preferentially oxidised over non-protein energy sources. In many teleost species, an improvement in protein retention can be achieved when low-protein diets are used as long as the dietary non-protein energy fraction increases(Reference Lee and Putnam5, Reference Alvarez, Lopez-Bote and Diez16, Reference Dias, Alvarez and Diez17).

Measurements of enzyme activity associated with growth parameters are generally useful tools to study fish metabolic adaptation to dietary supply(Reference Dabrowski, Guderley, John and Ronald18). The activity of key hepatic enzymes involved in protein catabolism has been pointed out as a relevant indicator of the metabolic utilisation of dietary protein by fish(Reference Fynn-Aikins, Hughes and Vandenberg19, Reference Metón, Mediavilla and Caseras20). Moreover, non-protein energy and dietary protein levels can generate different responses in hepatic lipogenic enzymes(Reference Dias, Alvarez and Diez17, Reference Fernandez, Miquel and Cordoba21). With the increase in non-protein energy supplied either as lipids or carbohydrates, changes in β-oxidation and glycolytic pathways are expected. Mitochondrial β-oxidation is the major energy-producing pathway from fatty acid oxidation, providing an important source of energy for tissues, especially the heart and the skeletal muscle(Reference Rinaldo, Matern and Bennett22). Assessment of the major sites of lipid catabolism and synthesis may provide further insight into the apparent weak utilisation of dietary lipids in Senegalese sole.

The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the limited capacity of Senegalese sole to utilise dietary lipids is related to dietary protein levels. To this end, a 2 × 2 factorial design was applied where two dietary lipid (4–17 % DM) and two dietary protein (just below and above the requirement levels, 48 and 54 % DM) levels were tested in Senegalese sole juveniles. The dietary lipid levels were chosen based on previous experiments(Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15) where sole fed with diets containing 4 % lipid displayed significantly higher growth rates than those fed higher lipid levels (12, 16 and 20 % lipid, DM basis). At the end of the trial, growth performance, body composition and feed utilisation were analysed. In addition, the activity of selected hepatic enzymes was determined as an indicator of intermediary metabolism. Therefore, the activities of selected enzymes involved in amino acid catabolism (alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)), fatty acid oxidation (3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (HAD)), fatty acid synthesis (fatty acid synthase (FAS)) and glucose catabolism (phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK-1)) were assessed.

Materials and methods

Experimental diets

In the present study, four experimental diets were formulated to contain two protein levels, below and above the requirement levels (48 and 54 % DM), and two lipid levels, previously shown to result in significantly different growth rates (4 and 17 % DM) (Table 1). The increase in the lipid levels was achieved by adding fish oil and lowering the amount of wheat meal, whereas the two protein levels were obtained by mixing different quantities of wheat meal and wheat gluten. As a consequence, all diets had varying carbohydrate levels that resulted in different starch contents. Low-fat/low-protein diets had higher starch contents (26–20 v. 17–14 % DM). The ingredients and proximate composition are presented in Table 1. The ingredients were finely ground, mixed and pelleted dry without steaming using a laboratory pelleting machine (C-300 model; California Pellet Mill) with a 2·0 mm die.

Table 1 Ingredients and proximate composition of the experimental diets with the different protein and lipid levels

LT, low temperature; CPSP G, fish soluble protein concentrate (hydrolysed fishmeal); Lutavit C35, vitamin C; Lutavit E50, vitamin E; DCP, dibasic calcium phosphate.

* Vitamins (per kg diet): vitamin A, 10 000 IU (retinol, 3000 mg); vitamin D3, 2125 IU (cholecalciferol, 53 mg); vitamin K3, 12·5 mg; vitamin B12, 0·025 mg; vitamin B1, 10 mg; vitamin B2, 25 mg; vitamin B6, 12·5 mg; folic acid, 12·5 mg; biotin, 0·86 mg; inositol, 300 mg; nicotinic acid, 85 mg; pantothenic acid, 37·50 mg.

Minerals (per kg diet): Mn (manganese oxide), 25 mg; I (potassium iodide), 1·88 mg; Cu (copper sulphate), 6·25 mg; Co (cobalt sulphate), 0·13 mg; Zn (zinc oxide), 37·5 mg; Se (sodium selenite), 0·31 mg; Fe (iron sulphate), 75 mg.

Growth trial

The present study was conducted under the supervision of an accredited expert in laboratory animal science (following Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) category C recommendations) and according to the European Economic Community animal experimentation guidelines directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC).

The study was performed at the experimental facilities of Centro de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental (CIIMAR), Porto, Portugal, with Senegalese sole (S. senegalensis) juveniles supplied by a commercial fish farm (Coelho & Castro). After arrival at the experimental unit, fish were acclimatised to the new facilities for 2 weeks. For each treatment, three homogeneous groups of twenty fish (average initial body weight 17 (sd 1·8) g) were grown in white fibre glass tanks (50 cm × 35 cm). Each tank was supplied with filtered and heated (20 ± 1°C) seawater (30‰), at a flow rate of 1·5 litres/min. The most important water parameters (temperature, dissolved O2, salinity, pH and nitrogenous compounds) were monitored during the entire trial and maintained at levels within the limits recommended for marine species. Fish were exposed to an artificial photoperiod of 12 h light. At the beginning and end of the experiment, individual weights and the length of fish were recorded. Fish were fed ad libitum by automatic feeders six to eight meals per d (24 h) over a period of 114 d. All tanks were daily monitored and feed distribution adjusted according to feed losses in each tank(Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15).

At the beginning of the feeding trial, ten fish from the initial stock were sampled and stored at − 20°C until whole-body analysis. At the end of the trial, three fish per tank were sampled 24 h after the last meal for the same purpose. All fish sampled were euthanised by a sharp blow on the head. Liver and muscle were removed from twelve fish per tank 6 h postprandial and immediately frozen in liquid N2, and thereafter stored at − 80°C. From those, two liver samples were used for total lipid analysis and the remaining ten liver samples for determination of enzyme activity.

Analytical methods

Frozen samples from each tank were cut without thawing into pieces avoiding drip losses, minced altogether using a meat mincer and pooled homogeneously. After homogenisation, a part of each sample was used to determine the moisture content (105°C for 24 h to constant weight). The rest of the samples were subsequently freeze-dried before further analyses.

Feed and freeze-dried whole-body samples were analysed for DM (105°C for 24 h), ash (550°C for 6 h, Nabertherm L9/11/B170; Nabertherm GmbH), crude protein (N × 6·25, Nitrogen Analyser, Leco FP-528; Leco), crude lipid (petroleum diethyl ether extraction, Soxtherm Multistat/SX PC; Gerhardt) and gross energy (adiabatic bomb calorimeter, C2000; IKA). Starch was measured following the amyloglucosidase–amylase method(23).

Liver samples were analysed individually for total lipid levels following Folch et al. (Reference Folch, Lees and Sloane Stanley24). HAD (EC 1.1.1.35) activity was measured in the liver and muscle according to Kobayashi et al. (Reference Kobayashi, Jiang and Hashimoto25). ALAT (EC 2.6.1.2), ASAT (EC 2.6.1.1) and GDH (EC 1.4.1.2) activities were determined as follows: a frozen sample of either the liver or muscle was homogenised, diluted at 1:10 in ice-cold buffer (30 mm-HEPES, 0·25 mm-saccharose, 0·5 mm-EDTA, 5 mm-K2HPO4 and 1 mm-dithiothreitol, pH 7·4). The homogenate was then centrifuged at 900 g for 10 min, and the supernatant used for ALAT, ASAT and GDH determinations. For GDH, the supernatant was sonicated for 1 min (pulse 1 s, amplitude 50) and centrifuged again at 15 000 g for 20 min. ALAT and ASAT were assayed using kits from Enzyline (ALAT/GPT, reference no. 63 313; ASAT/GOT, reference no. 63 213) at 37°C and followed by at 340 nm. GDH activity was measured using 10 mm-l-glutamic acid at 37°C, as described previously by Bergmeyer(Reference Bergmeyer26).

FAS activity was measured in the liver by an isotopic method using [14C]acetyl-CoA according to Hsu & Butterworth(Reference Hsu, Butterworth and Lownstein27). Liver was homogenised in three volumes of ice-cold buffer (0·02 m-Tris–HCl, 0·25 m-sucrose, 2 mm-EDTA, 0·1 m-NaF, 0·5 mm-phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride and 0·01 m-b-mercaptoethanol, pH 7·4). The homogenates were centrifuged at 15 000 g for 20 min at 4°C and the activity of FAS was measured on the supernatant.

PFK-1 activity was assayed in the muscle in a final volume of 0·2 ml containing 100 mm-Tris–HCl (pH 8·25), 5 mm-MgCl2, 50 mm-KCl, 0·15 mm-NADH, 4 mm-ammonium sulphate, 12 mm-2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mm-fructose-6-phosphate, fructose bisphosphate aldolase (0·675 U/ml, EC 4.1.2.13), triose-phosphate isomerase (5 U/ml, EC 5.3.1.1), glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (2 U/ml, EC 1.1.99.5) and 5 μl crude extract. The PFK-1 reaction was measured after the addition of 1 mm-fructose-6-phosphate at 30°C, followed by a decrease in absorbance at 340 nm.

One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalysed the hydrolysis of 1 μmol of substrate per min at the assay temperature. Enzyme activities were expressed per mg soluble protein. Protein concentration was measured according to the Bradford method(Reference Bradford28), using a protein assay kit (Bio Rad) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses followed methods outlined by Zar(Reference Zar29). All data were tested for homogeneity of variances by Bartlett's tests, and then subjected to a two-way ANOVA with dietary protein and lipid levels as main effects using STATISTICA 9.0 (Statsoft). When protein × lipid interactions were significant (P≤ 0·05), individual means were compared using Tukey's test. Significant differences were considered when P≤ 0·05.

Results

Feed intake varied significantly with the dietary treatments and was lower with the high-lipid diets so that gross energy intake was similar in the four groups. Given the large differences in dietary lipid levels (17 v. 4 % of DM), lipid intake was significantly higher in fish fed the 17 % lipid diets despite the reduction in feed intake. As expected, there was an interaction between the lipid and protein levels for starch intake. The diets with a low lipid level (higher dietary starch content) clearly presented higher starch intake compared with the high-fat diets. Protein intake was affected either by the lipid or protein level and was significantly higher (P< 0·05) in the diets containing 54 % crude protein with the highest values recorded for fish fed the diet 54 %/4 %.

At the end of the trial, all treatments resulted in a threefold increase in body weight (Table 2) that ranged from 52 g (54 %/17 %) to 60 g (54 %/4 %). The daily growth index and the final body weight were significantly affected by the dietary lipid levels, with the highest values recorded for the diets with the low lipid/high starch level (P≤ 0·05). The feed conversion ratio was affected by both the protein (P< 0·05) and lipid levels (P< 0·05) of the diets with values ranging from 1·14 (54 %/17 %) to 1·34 (48 %/4 %). The protein efficiency ratio was affected by the lipid levels and was higher in fish fed the high-lipid diets (1·66 and 1·62 for 54 %/17 % and 48 %/17 %, respectively).

Table 2 Effect of the different dietary protein/lipid levels on Senegalese sole intake and growth after 114 d (Mean values and standard deviations, n 3)

DGI, daily growth index; FCR, feed conversion ratio; PER, protein efficiency ratio.

a,b,c,d Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05).

* Nutrient intake = nutrient intake/average body weight ((initial body weight+final body weight)/2)/d.

DGI = 100 × ((final body weight)1/3− (initial body weight)1/3)/d.

FCR = dry feed intake/weight gain.

§ PER = weight gain/crude protein intake.

No differences were found in the hepatosomatic index and liver lipid content between the treatments, with the values ranging from 0·99 to 1·01 and 8·54 to 11·10, respectively. The viscerosomatic index was significantly affected by the lipid levels (P< 0·05), with the high-lipid diets leading to higher values. Whole-body protein and moisture were significantly affected by the lipid levels, and were higher in fish fed the low-lipid diets compared with fish fed the high-lipid diets (Table 3). The opposite trend was observed for both whole-body energy and lipid content. The dietary lipid levels had a stronger effect on whole-body lipid and energy content than the dietary protein levels.

Table 3 Effect of the different dietary protein/lipid levels on Senegalese sole somatic indices (n 12) and nutrient utilisation (n 3) after 114 d (Mean values and standard deviations)

HSI, hepatosomatic index; VSI, viscerosomatic index; WW, wet weight.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05).

* HSI = 100 × (liver weight/body weight) (%).

VSI = 100 × (visceral weight/body weight) (%).

Initial body composition was as follows: moisture, 75·65 % WW; ash, 2·49 % WW; protein, 17·22 % WW; lipids, 4·53 % WW; energy, 5·81 kJ/g WW.

§ Nutrient gain = (nutrient in final carcass–nutrient in initial carcass)/average body weight/d.

Retention = 100 × (final body weight × final carcass nutrient content–initial body weight × initial carcass nutrient content)/nutrient intake.

DM gain was similar among the treatments and varied from 2·24 (48 %/4 %) to 2·51 (48 %/17 %). Protein gain was affected by the lipid levels and was higher in fish fed the low-lipid diets. An interaction between the protein and lipid levels was observed for lipids and energy gain; fish fed the high lipid levels deposited more lipids and, consequently, more energy. DM was affected by either the dietary lipid or protein levels, with the higher values registered for the 54 %/17 % (23·78 %) and the lowest for the 48 %/4 % (18·18 %) diets. Lipids and energy retention (Table 3) were significantly affected by the lipid levels (P< 0·05), whereas protein retention was neither affected by the lipid levels nor by the protein content. Fish fed the low-lipid diets displayed higher lipid retention than those fed the high-lipid diets. The inverse was observed for energy retention since fish fed the high-lipid diets ingested higher amounts of lipids.

In the muscle, activity of the enzymes involved in protein catabolism (ALAT, ASAT and GDH) was not significantly affected by the dietary treatments (Table 4). In the liver, ASAT activity was significantly lower in fish fed the low-lipid diets than in those fed the high-lipid diets (P< 0·05). The activity of HAD in either the liver or muscle was not affected by the protein or lipid levels in the diet. FAS was significantly affected by both the protein and lipid levels. FAS activity was higher in fish fed the low lipid level and the highest dietary protein level. PFK in the muscle was mainly affected by the lipid levels and ranged from 836·9 (48 %/17 %) to 1150·9 mU/mg protein (48 %/4 %) (Table 4).

Table 4 Effect of the different dietary protein:lipid ratios on Senegalese sole enzyme activity (mU/mg protein) after 114 d (Mean values and standard deviations, n 6)

ALAT, alanine aminotransferase; ASAT, aspartate aminotransferase; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; HAD, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase; FAS, fatty acid synthase; PFK, phosphofructokinase.

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrated that high-fat diets do not promote growth since Senegalese sole fed the high-lipid diets had a lower growth rate, despite the similar energy intake of the four groups. The present study confirms the results from earlier studies showing that increasing dietary lipid levels when dietary protein content is kept constant did not improve growth performance in either juveniles(Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15) or large-sized sole(Reference Valente, Linares and Villanueva30). Moreover, diets containing lipid levels above 8 % resulted in reduced growth rates in Senegalese sole juveniles(Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15). The contrary is observed in salmonids and most marine fish species(Reference Lee and Putnam5Reference Company, Calduch-Giner and Kaushik31Reference Hillestad and Johnsen33). In other flatfish species, the picture is not so clear. In juvenile (140 g)(Reference Helland and Grisdale-Helland13) or commercial-sized (1 kg) halibut(Reference Grisdale-Helland and Helland34), growth performance was not affected by the inclusion of non-protein energy sources (lipids and carbohydrates), even when dietary protein was below its protein requirement(Reference Hamre, Øfsti and Næss11). In juvenile turbot(Reference Caceres-Martinez, Cadena-Roa and Métailler35, Reference Regost, Arzel and Cardinal36) and Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)(Reference Lee, Cho and Kim37), a decline in growth rate was observed when fish were fed lipid-rich diets with high protein levels, and a possible positive role of carbohydrates was suggested in Japanese flounder(Reference Lee, Kim and Lall38). However, Caceres-Martinez et al. (Reference Caceres-Martinez, Cadena-Roa and Métailler35) found that increasing dietary lipids with a protein level below the protein requirement did not affect turbot growth. The present findings do not support the hypothesis of a protein-sparing effect of dietary lipids in Senegalese sole, regardless of the dietary protein levels. Indeed, the lowest-energy diets (devoid of fish oil addition) were able to promote higher growth rates than the high-lipid diets (high-energy-density diets). Despite the similar energy intake, most of the energy ingested by sole fed the low-lipid diets was delivered by protein and starch, and even so these fish showed the highest growth performance. As mentioned before, low-lipid diets presented higher starch content, which can be the reason for this unexpected higher growth. Incorporation of high lipid levels in the diets for salmonids and most marine fish species is a common practice to improve protein retention(Reference Lee and Putnam5, Reference Dias, Alvarez and Diez17, Reference Hillestad and Johnsen33, Reference Cho, Hynes and Wood39). Carbohydrates can also be used to spare protein, although in marine fish, which are mainly carnivorous, the ability to utilise this macronutrient for energy proposes is generally limited when compared with lipids(Reference Stone40, Reference Wilson41). In European seabass and gilthead sea bream, data regarding the efficiency of protein sparing by carbohydrates are contradictory, with studies reporting either a significant protein-sparing effect or no effect at all(Reference Enes, Panserat and Kaushik42). The interaction between macronutrients is fairly well documented in fish species. A recent study in rainbow trout has suggested that impaired glucose utilisation in carnivorous species can be dependent on dietary lipid levels(Reference Figueiredo-Silva, Panserat and Kaushik43). In Senegalese sole, protein retention was not influenced by either the lipid or protein levels in the diet. However, nutrient gain and whole body composition were significantly affected by the composition of the diets. Body protein content and protein gain were lower in fish fed the high-fat/low-starch diets, regardless of the dietary protein levels, providing additional evidence that dietary lipids do not favour protein accretion in Senegalese sole and that carbohydrates probably have a positive effect in nutrient utilisation. Further studies with adequate design are needed to assess the possible link between dietary carbohydrates and lipid intolerance. Overall, the results support the assumption that lipids are not being efficiently used as non-protein energy sources, even when the protein content is below the species requirement. This also could result from impaired lipid absorption that would limit the availability of dietary lipids for metabolic pathways. However, a recent study from Dias et al. (Reference Dias, Yúfera and Valente44) has suggested a high degree of lipid absorption in the intestine given the fact that energy digestibility of a diet with 55 % protein and 14 % fat was approximately 93 %. Data on the activity of enzymes involved in amino acid catabolism reinforce the hypothesis of a low protein-sparing effect of dietary lipids in Senegalese sole. Dietary amino acids can be used for protein deposition and growth or diverted from this pathway to serve as carbon substrates for gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis, ketogenesis or energy production. When amino acids are not used for tissue protein synthesis, they are rapidly deaminated through the combined intervention of transaminases such as ALAT and ASAT, and GDH. In seabream (Sparus aurata), hepatic ALAT appears to be sensitive to dietary protein levels(Reference Metón, Mediavilla and Caseras20), and in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and rainbow trout, high-protein diets promoted the stimulation of liver ALAT(Reference Fynn-Aikins, Hughes and Vandenberg19, Reference Lupiánez, Sánchez-Lozano and García-Rejón45). In Mugil capito, the activity of both ALAT and ASAT increased with the increase in the protein content of the diet(Reference Alexis and Papaparaskeva-Papoutsoglou46). In the present study, the activity of ALAT, ASAT and GDH in the liver of sole was not affected by dietary protein levels. Contrarily to our expectations, the only significant change regarding the activity of the enzymes involved in amino acid catabolism was an increase in ASAT activity in the liver of sole fed the high-lipid diets, at both protein levels tested (48 and 54 % DM), supporting the assumption that high-lipid diets do not promote protein sparing. In seabream, ASAT seems to have a more prominent role in protein mobilisation compared with ALAT, but the activity of both enzymes decreased when fish were fed with high-energy diets, regardless of the protein levels(Reference Metón, Mediavilla and Caseras20). In the liver of Atlantic salmon, ASAT activity is not dependent on the type of dietary energy sources(Reference Fynn-Aikins, Hughes and Vandenberg19). With the increase in aspartate transamination in the liver of sole fed the high-lipid diets, higher concentrations of glutamate, the substrate of GDH, were expected and thus an elevated activity of GDH. However, liver GDH activity did not respond to increased ASAT activity.

Muscle tissue represents the largest body compartment and is responsible for most of the energy expenditure in fish. Dietary lipid content did not significantly affect the activity of ALAT, ASAT and GDH in the sole muscle, although there was a significant negative correlation between ALAT activity in the muscle and protein gain (R − 0·73, P= 0·01). Nevertheless, Campos et al. (Reference Campos, Valente and Borges47) observed a decrease in the expression of myogenic regulatory factors and myosins in the muscle of Senegalese sole fed increasing dietary lipid levels, supporting somehow the hypothesis that high lipid levels depress growth by reducing protein accretion.

Whole-body lipids and energy content were significantly affected by both the lipid and the protein levels of the diets. The high-lipid diets led to a significantly higher whole-body lipid and energy content of sole, confirming the effect of elevated lipid intake on whole-body lipid accumulation widely reported in various animals. In sole, lipid gain promoted by the high-lipid diets probably resulted from the storage of dietary fat because the activity of FAS, the enzyme catalysing the end-step of lipid neosynthesis, was depressed in the liver of sole fed the high-lipid diets. The higher body fat content observed in sole fed the high-lipid diets reinforces the assumption that dietary lipids are effectively absorbed once digested. However, lipid retention was significantly lower with the 17 % fat diets than with the 4 % lipid diets regardless of the dietary protein levels, suggesting that part of the dietary fat supply was diverted towards other pathways. Despite the general belief that high-protein diets may promote high lipid deposition in fish(Reference Dias, Alvarez and Diez17, Reference Lupiánez, Sánchez-Lozano and García-Rejón45, Reference Figueiredo-Silva, Corraze and Rema48), in the present study, lipid gain and whole-body lipid content were the highest in sole fed the high-lipid/low-protein diet, suggesting metabolic disturbances when high fat levels are combined with high protein levels in the diet.

The low activity of FAS suggests a marginal contribution of de novo synthesis of lipids for the increment of body lipid content. This could be related to the fact that in sole, as in other flatfish, the capacity to store fat is limited. However, FAS activity was found to be highly sensitive to the composition of nutrient intake. The highest value was found in the liver of sole fed the low-fat/high-protein diet. The inhibition of FAS by increasing levels of dietary lipids is a well-documented phenomenon in several species(Reference Dias, Alvarez and Diez17, Reference Arnesen, Krogdahl and Kristiansen49, Reference Likimani and Wilson50) including Senegalese sole(Reference Dias, Rueda-Jasso and Panserat14). Dias et al. (Reference Dias, Rueda-Jasso and Panserat14) showed that a diet with 21 % fat led to a reduced specific activity of FAS compared with a diet with 11 % fat. We should also consider that high-fat diets contained a greater amount of n-3 PUFA, which have been proved responsible for decreasing the activity of some lipogenic enzymes, including FAS(Reference Teran-garcia, Adamson and Yu51). In the present study, the higher level of dietary starch in the low-fat diets could have further enhanced FAS activity, as it has been found in rainbow trout(Reference Alvarez, Lopez-Bote and Diez16) and blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo)(Reference Figueiredo-Silva, Corraze and Rema48) that digestible carbohydrate favoured lipogenesis. In addition, the higher values of FAS activity in the liver of sole fed the 54 % protein diets suggest that some dietary amino acids could have been used as substrates for de novo lipogenesis, but with a marginal consequence on body lipid content.

The preferential sites for lipid deposition are not quite well defined. In flatfish species, more than two-thirds of the lipid content appears to be located in the bone, fins and brain(Reference Hamre, Øfsti and Næss11, Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15, Reference Berge and Storebakken52). Nevertheless, and contrarily to what has been observed in other marine fishes, it seems that liver is not a preferential organ for lipid deposition in Senegalese sole, since the hepatosomatic index and lipid content were not affected by the dietary protein or lipid content. Moreover, the viscerosomatic index was significantly higher in fish fed the high-lipid diets, showing the capacity of the digestive tract to accumulate perivisceral fat. Indeed, a twofold increase in intestinal lipid content was observed previously in Senegalese sole fed diets with 16 and 20 % lipid levels compared with 4 % lipid diets(Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15).

Mitochondrial β-oxidation is the major energy-producing pathway from fatty acids. From the cleavage of fatty acid in acetyl-CoA, with the reduction of NAD+ to NADH as part of the β-oxidation spiral(Reference Rinaldo, Matern and Bennett22), ATP can be generated to supply energy and cover cellular energy needs. Compared with the liver, white muscle has a lower enzyme specific activity expressed per unit tissue. However, it is worth considering data from white muscle for the assessment of global β-oxidation capacity due to this tissue's large size(Reference Stubhaug, Frøyland and Torstensen53). The increase in dietary lipids or dietary protein levels did not change the activity of HAD, one of the key enzymes of the β-oxidation pathway, neither in the liver nor in the muscle of sole. Similar results were observed in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from different genetic lines (fat line v. lean line) fed high-energy and low-energy diets(Reference Kolditz, Borthaire and Richard3). In haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)(Reference Nanton, Lall and Ross54), there was no significant increase in mitochondrial or peroxisomal β-oxidation activity in various tissues, when the dietary lipid level increased from 12 to 24 %. In demersal fish such as sole and haddock, specific activity from β-oxidation key enzymes is lower compared with salmon or rainbow trout. Sole(Reference Dias, Rueda-Jasso and Panserat14, Reference Borges, Oliveira and Casal15) and gadoid(Reference Nanton, Lall and Ross54, Reference Nanton, Lall and McNiven55) fishes, in general, have reduced capacity to accumulate lipids. Muscle, which can constitute more than 50 % of the whole body, is a lean tissue with no more than 5 % of fat (wet weight basis). Overall, the low mitochondrial β-oxidation observed in both tissues (liver and muscle) probably reflects the low lipid levels in these tissues. Fish fed the high-fat diets did not enhance fatty acid oxidation despite the higher whole-body lipid levels and fat intake. The regulatory mechanisms involved in the balance between lipid intake, fatty acid oxidation and lipid deposition are intricate with important physiological implications such as obesity(Reference Raben, Agerholm-Larsen and Flint56, Reference Westerterp, Smeets and Lejeune57). When high-lipid diets are chronically ingested, this balance is affected, resulting in lipid accumulation and, consequently, health disorders(Reference Pi-Sunyer58Reference Bessesen, Bull and Cornier60). The regulatory mechanisms of lipid oxidation and deposition are still not fully understood, and lessons can be taken from lean models to reveal these mechanisms. The absence of the response of HAD to the dietary levels of fat could be related to the use of carbohydrate substrates for energy production.

We found that PFK-1 (EC 2.7.1.11) activity was significantly enhanced in the muscle of sole fed the low-lipid diets, regardless of the dietary protein levels. As mentioned before, the formulation of the 4 % lipid diets was achieved by increasing the proportions of wheat meal and hence resulted in increased starch levels (Table 1). Although Dias et al. (Reference Dias, Yúfera and Valente44) found that wheat meal had a lower energy digestibility compared with other ingredients tested, the up-regulation of PFK-1 activity was probably due to higher starch intake in the 4 % lipid diets. PFK-1 catalyses the formation of fructose-1,6-biphosphate from fructose-6-phosphate and MgATP, one of the early rate-limiting steps of glycolysis(Reference Su and Storey61, Reference Mediavilla, Metón and Baanante62). In omnivorous or herbivorous fish species, metabolic adaptations to high-carbohydrate diets have been described(Reference Wilson41). In the wild, Senegalese sole feeds basically on benthonic invertebrates, such as polychaeta larvae, bivalves, molluscs and small crustaceans(Reference Cabral63). However, despite apparent carnivorous feeding habits, Senegalese sole presents digestive features generally found in species with omnivorous feeding habits(Reference Yúfera and Darías64), i.e. residual stomach acid digestion and proteolysis and a rather long intestine where pH is always above 6. Dias et al. (Reference Dias, Rueda-Jasso and Panserat14) reported that hepatic activity of glucokinase and pyruvate kinase, other two key glycolytic enzymes, was not affected by the inclusion of high levels of carbohydrates, irrespective of starch type, when the activity was measured 18–20 h after the meal. Nevertheless, data obtained in the present experiment suggest that glucose is used as a source of energy by the muscle when the lipid supply is limited and the dietary starch content high. In flounder, Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Cho and Kim37, Reference Lee, Kim and Lall38) also suggested a possible role of carbohydrates in metabolic energy supply when the dietary lipid level is low (7 % lipid in the diets). This requires further verification through experiments focused on the role of carbohydrates as non-protein energy sources in flatfish.

In conclusion, according to the results achieved so far, dietary lipids do not seem to be a good energy source for promoting growth in S. senegalensis. There is no evidence of a protein-sparing effect by increasing dietary lipid levels, even when the dietary protein level is lowered from 54 to 48 %. The activity of enzymes involved in key metabolic pathways points towards a lack of metabolic adaptation to high lipid levels, reflecting the high protein requirement of the species. The metabolic fate of dietary lipids remains to be fully understood but could be linked to the competition with carbohydrates for energy supply. Data suggest a possible metabolic adaptation to dietary carbohydrates in Senegalese sole, which contrasts with what is generally observed in Salmonids and most marine species.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia of Portugal (PhD grant SFRH/BD/47,780/2008). The authors would like to thank Christiane Vachot and Laurence Larroquet for their valuable help in the enzyme determinations. P. B. carried out the main experimental work and wrote the draft of the manuscript under the direction of the project designer and leader L. M. P. V.; F. M. and J. D. assisted with the experimental design and draft writing. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Bureau, DP, Kaushik, SJ, Cho, CY, et al. (2002) Bioenergetics. In Fish Nutrition, 3rd ed., pp. 159 [John, EH and Ronald, WH, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2Kaushik, SJ (1998) Nutritional bioenergetics and estimation of waste production in non-salmonids. Aquat Living Resour 11, 211217.Google Scholar
3Kolditz, C, Borthaire, M, Richard, N, et al. (2008) Liver and muscle metabolic changes induced by dietary energy content and genetic selection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294, R1154R1164.Google Scholar
4Sargent, JR & Tacon, AG (1999) Development of farmed fish: a nutritionally necessary alternative to meat. Proc Nutr Soc 58, 377383.Google Scholar
5Lee, DJ & Putnam, GB (1973) The response of rainbow trout to varying protein/energy ratios in a test diet. J Nutr 103, 916922.Google Scholar
6Lee, S-M, Park, CS & Bang, IC (2002) Dietary protein requirement of young Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus fed isocaloric diets. Fish Sci 68, 158164.Google Scholar
7NRC (1993) Nutrient Requirements of Fish. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
8Peres, H & Oliva-Teles, A (2008) Lysine requirement and efficiency of lysine utilization in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) juveniles. Aquaculture 275, 283290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Rema, P, Conceicao, LEC, Evers, F, et al. (2008) Optimal dietary protein levels in juvenile Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis). Aquac Nutr 14, 17.Google Scholar
10Wilson, RP, John, EH & Ronald, WH (2002) Amino acids and proteins. In Fish Nutrition, 3rd ed., pp. 143179. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
11Hamre, K, Øfsti, A, Næss, T, et al. (2003) Macronutrient composition of formulated diets for Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus, L.) juveniles. Aquaculture 227, 233244.Google Scholar
12Bromley, PJ (1980) Effect of dietary protein, lipid and energy content on the growth of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Aquaculture 19, 359369.Google Scholar
13Helland, SJ & Grisdale-Helland, B (1998) Growth, feed utilization and body composition of juvenile Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) fed diets differing in the ratio between the macronutrients. Aquaculture 166, 4956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Dias, J, Rueda-Jasso, R, Panserat, S, et al. (2004) Effect of dietary carbohydrate-to-lipid ratios on growth, lipid deposition and metabolic hepatic enzymes in juvenile Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis, Kaup). Aquac Res 35, 11221130.Google Scholar
15Borges, P, Oliveira, B, Casal, S, et al. (2009) Dietary lipid level affects growth performance and nutrient utilisation of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) juveniles. Br J Nutr 102, 10071014.Google Scholar
16Alvarez, MJ, Lopez-Bote, CJ, Diez, A, et al. (1999) The partial substitution of digestible protein with gelatinized starch as an energy source reduces susceptibility to lipid oxidation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) muscle. J Anim Sci 77, 33223329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Dias, J, Alvarez, MJ, Diez, A, et al. (1998) Regulation of hepatic lipogenesis by dietary protein/energy in juvenile European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture 161, 169186.Google Scholar
18Dabrowski, K & Guderley, H (2003) Intermediary metabolism. In Fish Nutrition, 3rd ed., pp. 309365 [John, EH and Ronald, WH, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
19Fynn-Aikins, K, Hughes, SG & Vandenberg, GW (1995) Protein retention and liver aminotransferase activities in Atlantic salmon fed diets containing different energy sources. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 111, 163170.Google Scholar
20Metón, I, Mediavilla, D, Caseras, A, et al. (1999) Effect of diet composition and ration size on key enzyme activities of glycolysis-gluconeogenesis, the pentose phosphate pathway and amino acid metabolism in liver of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Br J Nutr 82, 223232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Fernandez, F, Miquel, AG, Cordoba, M, et al. (2007) Effects of diets with distinct protein-to-carbohydrate ratios on nutrient digestibility, growth performance, body composition and liver intermediary enzyme activities in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L.) fingerlings. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 343, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Rinaldo, P, Matern, D & Bennett, MJ (2002) Fatty acid oxidation disorders. Annu Rev Physiol 64, 477502.Google Scholar
23AOAC (2006) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed., chapter 32, pp. 3839. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International.Google Scholar
24Folch, J, Lees, M & Sloane Stanley, GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226, 497509.Google Scholar
25Kobayashi, A, Jiang, LL & Hashimoto, T (1996) Two mitochondrial 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenases in bovine liver. J Biochem 119, 775782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Bergmeyer, HU (editor) (1974) Glutamate-Oxaloacetate Transaminase. UV-Assay, Manual Method. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
27Hsu, RY & Butterworth, PHW (1969) Pigeon liver fatty acid synthetase. In Methods of Enzymology, pp. 3339 [Lownstein, J, editor]. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
28Bradford, MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248254.Google Scholar
29Zar, JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed.London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
30Valente, LMP, Linares, F, Villanueva, JLR, et al. (2011) Dietary protein source or energy levels have no major impact on growth performance, nutrient utilisation or flesh fatty acids composition of market-sized Senegalese sole. Aquaculture 318, 128137.Google Scholar
31Company, R, Calduch-Giner, JA, Kaushik, S, et al. (1999) Growth performance and adiposity in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): risks and benefits of high energy diets. Aquaculture 171, 279292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Company, R, Calduch-Giner, JA, Perez-Sanchez, J, et al. (1999) Protein sparing effect of dietary lipids in common dentex (Dentex dentex): a comparative study with sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquat Living Resour 12, 2330.Google Scholar
33Hillestad, M & Johnsen, F (1994) High-energy/low-protein diets for Atlantic salmon: effects on growth, nutrient retention and slaughter quality. Aquaculture 124, 109116.Google Scholar
34Grisdale-Helland, B & Helland, SJ (1998) Macronutrient utilization by Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus): diet digestibility and growth of 1 kg fish. Aquaculture 166, 5765.Google Scholar
35Caceres-Martinez, C, Cadena-Roa, M & Métailler, R (1984) Nutritional requirements of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus): I. A preliminary study of protein and lipid utilization. J World Mariculture Soc 15, 191202.Google Scholar
36Regost, C, Arzel, J, Cardinal, M, et al. (2001) Dietary lipid level, hepatic lipogenesis and flesh quality in turbot (Psetta maxima). Aquaculture 193, 291309.Google Scholar
37Lee, S-M, Cho, SH & Kim, K-D (2000) Effects of dietary protein and energy levels on growth and body composition of juvenile flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. J World Aquacult Soc 31, 306315.Google Scholar
38Lee, S-M, Kim, K-D & Lall, SP (2003) Utilization of glucose, maltose, dextrin and cellulose by juvenile flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture 221, 427438.Google Scholar
39Cho, CY, Hynes, JD, Wood, KR, et al. (1994) Development of high-nutrient-dense, low-pollution diets and prediction of aquaculture wastes using biological approaches. Aquaculture 124, 293305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Stone, DAJ (2003) Dietary carbohydrate utilization by fish. Rev Fish Sci 11, 337369.Google Scholar
41Wilson, RP (1994) Utilization of dietary carbohydrate by fish. Aquaculture 124, 6780.Google Scholar
42Enes, P, Panserat, S, Kaushik, S, et al. (2011) Dietary carbohydrate utilization by European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) juveniles. Rev Fish Sci 19, 201215.Google Scholar
43Figueiredo-Silva, AC, Panserat, S, Kaushik, S, et al. (2011) High levels of dietary fat impair glucose homeostasis in rainbow trout. J Exp Biol 215, 169178.Google Scholar
44Dias, J, Yúfera, M, Valente, LMP, et al. (2010) Feed transit and apparent protein, phosphorus and energy digestibility of practical feed ingredients by Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis). Aquaculture 302, 9499.Google Scholar
45Lupiánez, JA, Sánchez-Lozano, MJ, García-Rejón, L, et al. (1989) Long-term effect of a high-protein/non-carbohydrate diet on the primary liver and kidney metabolism in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Aquaculture 79, 91101.Google Scholar
46Alexis, MN & Papaparaskeva-Papoutsoglou, E (1986) Aminotransferase activity in the liver and white muscle of Mugil capito fed diets containing different levels of protein and carbohydrate. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 83, 245249.Google Scholar
47Campos, C, Valente, LMP, Borges, P, et al. (2010) Dietary lipid levels have a remarkable impact on the expression of growth-related genes in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup). J Exp Biol 213, 200209.Google Scholar
48Figueiredo-Silva, AC, Corraze, G, Rema, P, et al. (2009) Blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) lipogenic and glycolytic pathways appear to be more related to dietary protein level than dietary starch type. Aquaculture 291, 101110.Google Scholar
49Arnesen, P, Krogdahl, Å & Kristiansen, (1993) Lipogenic enzyme activities in liver of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, L.). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 105, 541546.Google Scholar
50Likimani, TA & Wilson, RP (1982) Effects of diet on lipogenic enzyme activities in channel catfish hepatic and adipose tissue. J Nutr 112, 112117.Google Scholar
51Teran-garcia, M, Adamson, AW, Yu, G, et al. (2007) Polyunsaturated fatty acid suppression of fatty acid synthase (FASN): evidence for dietary modulation of NF-Y binding to the Fasn promoter by SREBP-1c. Biochem J 402, 591600.Google Scholar
52Berge, GM & Storebakken, T (1991) Effect of dietary fat level on weight gain, digestibility, and fillet composition of Atlantic halibut. Aquaculture 99, 331338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Stubhaug, I, Frøyland, L & Torstensen, B (2005) β-Oxidation capacity of red and white muscle and liver in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) – effects of increasing dietary rapeseed oil and olive oil to replace capelin oil. Lipids 40, 3947.Google Scholar
54Nanton, DA, Lall, SP, Ross, NW, et al. (2003) Effect of dietary lipid level on fatty acid beta-oxidation and lipid composition in various tissues of haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus L. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 135, 95108.Google Scholar
55Nanton, DA, Lall, SP & McNiven, MA (2001) Effects of dietary lipid level on liver and muscle lipid deposition in juvenile haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus L. Aquac Res 32, 225234.Google Scholar
56Raben, A, Agerholm-Larsen, L, Flint, A, et al. (2003) Meals with similar energy densities but rich in protein, fat, carbohydrate, or alcohol have different effects on energy expenditure and substrate metabolism but not on appetite and energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 91100.Google Scholar
57Westerterp, KR, Smeets, A, Lejeune, MP, et al. (2008) Dietary fat oxidation as a function of body fat. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 132135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Pi-Sunyer, FX (2002) The obesity epidemic: pathophysiology and consequences of obesity. Obesity 10, 97S104S.Google ScholarPubMed
59Lazar, MA (2005) How obesity causes diabetes: not a tall tale. Science 307, 373375.Google Scholar
60Bessesen, DH, Bull, S & Cornier, MA (2008) Trafficking of dietary fat and resistance to obesity. Physiol Behav 94, 681688.Google Scholar
61Su, JY & Storey, KB (1995) Fish muscle phosphofructokinase: influences of protein concentration on enzyme kinetic behaviour. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27, 12771283.Google Scholar
62Mediavilla, D, Metón, I & Baanante, IV (2007) Purification and kinetic properties of 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase from gilthead sea bream muscle. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770, 706715.Google Scholar
63Cabral, HN (2000) Comparative feeding ecology of sympatric (Solea solea) and (S. senegalensis), within the nursery areas of the Tagus estuary, Portugal. J Fish Biol 57, 15501562.Google Scholar
64Yúfera, M & Darías, MJ (2007) Changes in the gastrointestinal pH from larvae to adult in Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis). Aquaculture 267, 9499.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Ingredients and proximate composition of the experimental diets with the different protein and lipid levels

Figure 1

Table 2 Effect of the different dietary protein/lipid levels on Senegalese sole intake and growth after 114 d (Mean values and standard deviations, n 3)

Figure 2

Table 3 Effect of the different dietary protein/lipid levels on Senegalese sole somatic indices (n 12) and nutrient utilisation (n 3) after 114 d (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Table 4 Effect of the different dietary protein:lipid ratios on Senegalese sole enzyme activity (mU/mg protein) after 114 d (Mean values and standard deviations, n 6)