Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:08:48.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trypanosoma rangeli infection impairs reproductive success of Rhodnius prolixus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2022

Bruna Duarte da Silva
Affiliation:
Vector Behavior and Pathogen Interaction Group, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Alessandra Aparecida Guarneri*
Affiliation:
Vector Behavior and Pathogen Interaction Group, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Alessandra Aparecida Guarneri, E-mail: alessandra.guarneri@fiocruz.br

Abstract

Trypanosoma rangeli is a protozoan that infects triatomines and mammals in Central and South America. Although it does not cause disease to humans, this parasite produces different levels of pathogenicity to its invertebrate host, mainly in species of the genus Rhodnius. In this study, we followed T. rangeli-infected and uninfected pairs throughout their adult lives and measured the amount of blood ingested, number of eggs laid, number of eggs hatched and proportion of infertile eggs, as well as female life expectancy. We found that all reproductive parameters were drastically decreased during infection, mainly due to the reduced amount of blood the infected insects ingested throughout their lives. Reproductive parameters were also affected by the reduction of the life expectancy of infected females, as survival was positively correlated with the number of eggs laid. The strategies used by the parasite to be transmitted are discussed in view of the pathological effects it causes in the insect.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Trypanosoma rangeli is a digenetic parasite that infects triatomines and mammals in Central and South America (Guhl and Vallejo, Reference Guhl and Vallejo2003). The parasite does not cause disease in mammals, including humans, and its development in vertebrate hosts is still unknown. In vitro studies suggested that T. rangeli multiplication can occur in monocytes, but they failed to show replicative forms (Osorio et al., Reference Osorio, Travi, Palma and Saravia1995; Eger-Mangrich et al., Reference Eger-Mangrich, de Oliveira, Grisard, De Souza and Steindel2001). A more recent study suggested that it can multiply in secondary lymphoid organs, as DNA and live parasites were found in mice's spleen and lymph nodes 30 days post-infection (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Araújo, Martinelli, Teixeira-Carvalho, Alves-Silva and Guarneri2020). Trypanosoma rangeli infects triatomine species of different genera, but only completes its development, producing infective forms, in Rhodnius spp. Nevertheless, even when infecting Rhodnius, salivary gland colonization depends on the genetic background of the parasite and the host, which suggests a co-evolutionary association between T. rangeli isolates and their sympatric vectors (Maia da Silva et al., Reference Maia Da Silva, Junqueira, Campaner, Rodrigues, Crisante, Ramirez, Cabalero, Monteiro, Coura, Añez and Teixeira2007; Urrea et al., Reference Urrea, Guhl, Herrera, Falla, Carranza, Cuba-Cuba, Triana-Chávez, Grisard and Vallejo2011).

The development of T. rangeli in susceptible Rhodnius species begins when the triatomine feeds on an infected mammal and ingests the parasite. Blood trypomastigote forms start to differentiate into epimastigotes, the multiplicative forms, a few hours after reaching the anterior midgut (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Teixeira, de Sousa and Guarneri2018). Epimastigotes colonize the entire intestinal tract of the insect within 1–2 weeks after the infection started (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Teixeira, de Sousa and Guarneri2018). The infection is restricted to the intestine for a significant proportion of infected bugs. The mechanisms by which the parasite reaches the haemolymph are unknown, but the perimicrovillar membranes seem to function as a mechanical blockage (Gomes et al., Reference Gomes, Feder, Thomas, Garcia and Azambuja1999). The parasites reaching the haemocoel multiply freely in the haemolymph and then invade the salivary glands where metacyclogenesis occurs. Parasites will be transmitted when the insect feeds on a mammal, being inoculated into the host together with the saliva.

Trypanosoma rangeli can produce massive infections in the insect, which will generate different levels of pathogenic effects. Increased mortality rates, delay in development and post-ecdysis deformations are all reported effects in T. rangeli-infected Rhodnius (reviewed in Guarneri and Lorenzo, Reference Guarneri and Lorenzo2017; Guarneri and Schaub, Reference Guarneri, Schaub, Guarneri and Lorenzo2021). We have previously shown that T. rangeli decreases the fecundity of newly moulted adults of Rhodnius prolixus by interfering with the amount of blood females use in egg production (Fellet et al., Reference Fellet, Lorenzo, Elliot, Carrasco and Guarneri2014). In the present study, we followed a group of infected and uninfected pairs of R. prolixus during all their adult lives and evaluated the effects of T. rangeli infection on different parameters such as fecundity, fertility and life expectancy.

Material and methods

Triatomines

Rhodnius prolixus used in this study were obtained from a long-established colony in our laboratory (originally collected in Honduras in the 1990s). Insects were fed citrated rabbit blood on a monthly basis obtained from CECAL (Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) offered through an artificial feeder at 37°C, alternating with blood from anaesthetized chickens [intraperitoneal injections of a mixture of ketamine (20 mg kg−1; Cristália, Brazil) and detomidine (0.3 mg kg−1; Syntec, Brazil)] and mice [intraperitoneal injections of a mixture of ketamine (150 mg kg−1; Cristália) and xylazine (10 mg kg−1; Bayer, Brazil)]. The colony was maintained at 27 ± 1°C, 51 ± 7% RH, and exposed to a natural illumination cycle. All experiments using live animals were performed following FIOCRUZ guidelines on animal experimentation and were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA/FIOCRUZ) under the approved protocol number LW 8/17.

Parasites

The CHOACHI strain, originally isolated from naturally infected R. prolixus salivary glands (Schottelius, Reference Schottelius1987), was used to infect insects. The parasites were cultured by twice a week passages in liver-infusion tryptose medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 100 mg mL−1 streptomycin and 100 units mL−1 penicillin. The maintenance of parasites exclusively in culture medium generated parasites unable to colonize the salivary glands (Rodrigues et al., Reference Rodrigues, Lorenzo, Martins-Filho, Elliot and Guarneri2016). We used this population to guarantee a sufficient number of infected adults since, in our model, nymphs infected with parasites able to colonize the salivary glands hardly reach the adult phase (data not shown).

Insect infection

Trypanosoma rangeli infection was performed as described by Guarneri (Reference Guarneri, Michels, Ginger and Zilberstein2020). Heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 min) citrated rabbit blood containing culture epimastigotes (1 × 106 parasites mL−1) was offered in an artificial feeder for third instar nymphs. Seven days after moulting to the fourth instar, 1 μL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (0.15 M sodium chloride in 0.01 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4) containing 2.5 × 104 epimastigotes mL−1 was inoculated into the coelomic cavity of each nymph. A 50 μL syringe (Hamilton Company, USA, needle 13 × 3.3; ½”) connected to a dispenser (model 705, Hamilton Company) was used to inoculate the parasites. This inoculum is necessary to ensure systemic infections in all individuals with intestinal infections (reviewed in Guarneri and Lorenzo, Reference Guarneri and Lorenzo2017; Guarneri and Schaub, Reference Guarneri, Schaub, Guarneri and Lorenzo2021). One day after inoculation, insects were fed on anaesthetized mice. A sample of haemolymph collected from one of the tarsi was examined to confirm haemocoelomic infection. Insects in the control group were fed heat-inactivated citrated rabbit blood, inoculated with sterile PBS, and a haemolymph sample was collected at the same period as the infected group. After the infection procedure, anaesthetized mice were used as hosts for all other feedings. The experimental groups were kept in a chamber maintained at 26 ± 0.5°C and 12:12L/D. After moulting to the fifth instar, nymphs were sexed, and males and females were maintained in separated containers to prevent copula in newly moulted adults.

Two weeks after the imaginal moult, the adults were fed anaesthetized mice, and 1 week later, the insects were arranged in pairs (n = 18 and 15, for infected and uninfected groups) that were maintained in separate plastic vials (5.5 × 8.0 cm). Each vial contained a circular piece of filter paper and a cardboard strip as substrate and was closed with a cloth. Weekly, anaesthetized mice were offered to the insects for 1 h. Insects were individually weighed before and immediately after removing the mouse. The eggs produced by each pair were collected weekly and transferred to plastic plates. The following parameters were recorded: (a) amount of blood ingested; (b) the number of eggs laid; (c) egg hatching rate; (d) the percentage of infertile eggs (the absence of the embryo was confirmed by egg examination under a stereoscopic microscope); (e) life expectancy of females. The pairs were followed until the death of the female.

Statistical analyses

Multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to analyse reproductive parameters as the data included repeated measures and did not fit a parametric distribution. GEE models with the identity link function were adjusted considering the amount of blood ingested, the number of eggs laid, hatching rates and the percentage of infertile eggs as continuous outcomes. Infection status and time were used as covariates in all models. Sex was used as a third covariate when the model was adjusted to the amount of blood ingested. An exchangeable working correlation structure was used in the analyses. Parameter estimates were presented as coefficients (Coeff) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Survival curves were compared through log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Spearman's correlation was used to test the correlation between life expectancy and eggs laid. Data analyses were conducted using the statistical software JASP (Version 0.16.1) and R version 4.1.2 (R Core Team 2021, R Foundation of Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). GEE analysis was conducted using the package ‘geepack’ (Halekoh et al., Reference Halekoh, Højsgaard and Yan2006). All analyses considered the differences statistically significant when P < 0.05.

Results

The weight of newly moulted adults was similar for infected and uninfected individuals for both sexes (t-test, d.f. = 14, P > 0.05 for both sexes; n = 8 males and n = 8 females for control group, n = 13 males and n = 13 females for infected group). The amount of blood ingested by the adults was affected by infection and sex (Fig. 1; Table 1). Infected adults ingested less blood than uninfected ones [Table 1; Coeff (95% CI) = −33.580 (−45.578 to −21.581); P < 0.001]. Regarding sex, males ingested less blood than females [Table 1; Coeff (95% CI) = −44.763 (−55.006 to −34.519); P < 0.001]. The adjusted model showed a significant interaction of time with infection [Table 1; Coeff (95% CI) = −0.500 (−0.952 to −0.047); P = 0.03] and sex [Table 1; Coeff (95% CI) = 0.536 (0.128–0.944); P = 0.01]. Significant differences over time between infected and uninfected individuals were observed only for females. Setting time at 4 weeks, the mean amount of blood ingested by infected females was 35.6 mg less than that of uninfected ones [95% CI (−52.1 to −33.2)]. The differences became larger as time increased. For example, at 7 weeks, the difference between the 2 groups was 37.1 mg [95% CI (−47.5 to −26.7)]. Regarding sex, differences over time were only observed in the control group. At 4 weeks, the mean amount of blood ingested by males was 42.6 mg [95% CI (−52.1 to −33.2)] less than that of females. At 7 weeks, the difference decreased to 41 mg. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 2, all groups, except the infected females, showed a tendency of ingesting blood every 2 weeks.

Fig. 1. Amount of blood ingested by Rhodnius prolixus adults is affected by sex and Trypanosoma rangeli infection. Bars show the mean ± s.e. of the weekly amount of blood ingested (see Table 1 for significance values; n = 8 males and n = 8 females for control group, n = 13 males and n = 13 females for infected group). M, male; F, female; C, control; I, infected.

Fig. 2. Blood ingested throughout adult life by Rhodnius prolixus infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli. Data are shown as the weekly average amount of blood ingested. Female control, n = 9; male control, n = 9; female infected, n = 14; male infected, n = 12.

Table 1. Variables of the generalized estimating equations GEEs with significant effects on the amount of blood ingested by Rhodnius prolixus infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli (n = 8 males and n = 8 females, for control group, n = 13 males and n = 13 females for infected group).

All parameters of reproductive development were affected by infection, time and amount of blood ingested (Fig. 3). As expected, the amount of blood ingested positively affected the number of eggs laid (Table 2) [Coeff (95% CI) = 0.002 (0.00–0.004); P < 0.027; n = 8 for control group, n = 13 for infected group]. The coefficient of the comparison between infected and uninfected groups was negative, indicating that infected females produced fewer eggs than the control ones (Table 2). Indeed, uninfected females laid 652.3 ± 53.0 eggs during their lifetime, while infected ones laid only 92.2 ± 28.1. In addition, the model showed a significant interaction between time and infection. Uninfected females remained ovipositing for approximately 7 months (except for 1 pair, where the female laid eggs for 10 months). In the infected group, females stopped laying eggs after 5 months. The coefficient of the interaction between these parameters showed that the differences in the number of eggs laid by infected and uninfected females increased over time (Table 2; Fig. 3A). Eggs laid by infected females showed lower hatching rates [Fig. 3B, Coeff (95% CI) = −30.176 (−57.302 to −3.049; P = 0.029)]. Hatching rates also decreased with time [Coeff (95% CI) = −6.859 (−11.727 to −1.991); P = 0.006] and were positively affected by the amount of blood ingested [Coeff (95% CI) = 0.140 (0.035–0.244); P = 0.009]. The number of infertile eggs increased over time [Fig. 3C; Coeff (95% CI) = 7.702 (2.444–12.959); P = 0.004] and was higher in the infected group [Coeff (95% CI) = 30.236 (7.943–52.528); P = 0.008]. The amount of blood ingested negatively affected the number of infertile eggs [Coeff (95% CI) = −0.115 (−0.196 to −0.034); P = 0.005].

Fig. 3. Reproductive success of Rhodnius prolixus is highly affected by Trypanosoma rangeli infection. (A) Number of eggs. (B) Hatching rates. (C) Infertile eggs (see Table 2 for significance values; n = 8 for control group, n = 13 for infected group).

Table 2. Variables of the generalized estimating equations GEEs with significant effects on the number of eggs laid by Rhodnius prolixus females infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli (n = 8 for control group, n = 13 for infected group).

The life expectancy of infected females was also affected by T. rangeli infection (Fig. 4; log-rank, P = 0.01; n = 13 for control group, n = 15 for infected group). While uninfected females started to die after 7 months, only 33.3% of infected females were still alive in that period. The survival of uninfected and infected females was positively correlated with the number of eggs laid (Fig. 5; Spearman's r = 0.65, P = 0.01 for uninfected females; r = 0.73, P = 0.002 for infected females).

Fig. 4. Trypanosoma rangeli infection decreases the life expectancy of Rhodnius prolixus females (log-rank, P = 0.01; n = 13 for control group, n = 15 for infected group).

Fig. 5. Life expectancy-fecundity trade-off in Rhodnius prolixus infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli. The raw plot of the number of eggs that R. prolixus females laid against their survival. Filled circles show uninfected female; empty squares represent infected females. The linear regression of triatomine survival against the number of eggs each female laid was plotted using a full line for uninfected females and a dashed line for infected ones (Spearman's r = 0.65, P = 0.01 for uninfected females; r = 0.73, P = 0.002 for infected females; n = 13 for control group, n = 15 for infected group).

Discussion

Infection by T. rangeli severely affected all reproductive parameters evaluated, in addition to decreasing life expectancy rates of R. prolixus. Many parasites and pathogens reduce fecundity and host survival (Williamson and Von Wechmar, Reference Williamson and Von Wechmar1995; Maciel-de-Freitas et al., Reference Maciel-de-Freitas, Koella and Lourenço-de-Oliveira2011); while some only interfere with fecundity and fertility (Styer et al., Reference Styer, Meola and Kramer2007), others do not promote alterations in any of these parameters (Costanzo et al., Reference Costanzo, Muturi, Montgomery and Alto2014).

In our model, using a natural vector–parasite combination, we found a ~85% reduction in the number of eggs laid by infected females throughout their adult lives. Furthermore, more than half of these eggs did not hatch, mainly because no embryo developed in them. Blood digestion in Rhodnius takes place for about 14 days. After each blood meal, the fat body accumulates triacylglycerol, used for ovary growth and the oogenesis cycle in adult females (Gondim et al., Reference Gondim, Atella, Pontes and Majerowicz2018). Confirming this, uninfected females presented a tendency of feeding every 2 weeks, which was not observed in infected ones that ingested small quantities of blood on every occasion a mouse was offered. The reduced capacity to ingest blood by infected adults was possibly the most important determinant of fecundity reduction. When T. rangeli colonizes R. prolixus salivary glands, a 60% reduction in stored proteins is observed, which, in turn, affects the feeding behaviour of infected individuals, making blood feeding less efficient (Grewal, Reference Grewal1956; Añez and East, Reference Añez and East1984; Garcia et al., Reference Garcia, Mello, Azambuja and Ribeiro1994; Paim et al., Reference Paim, Pereira, Araújo, Gontijo and Guarneri2013). However, it is worth mentioning that we used parasites unable to invade salivary glands, as in our model, insects infected with invasive parasites rarely reach adulthood. Therefore, it will be interesting to evaluate in future studies what other effects of the infection affect the capacity of infected bugs to ingest blood. We previously showed that T. rangeli infection reduced the amounts of ingested blood turned into eggs in infected females (Fellet et al., Reference Fellet, Lorenzo, Elliot, Carrasco and Guarneri2014). As T. rangeli incorporates lipids from the insect (Folly et al., Reference Folly, Cunha e Silva, Lopes, Silva-Neto and Atella2003), part of the already scarce nutritional resources of females is used by the parasite for its own development, which further reduces the reserves available for egg production. Parasites transmitted vertically have their reproductive success dependent on that of their hosts; therefore, such parasites frequently develop low virulence. Horizontal transmission, in contrast, is less constrained by host condition and the increase in the parasite fitness can evolve at additional costs to the host (Agnew and Koella, Reference Agnew and Koella1997; Stewart et al., Reference Stewart, Logsdon and Kelley2005). In this sense, as a parasite that is transmitted only horizontally, reducing adult fecundity would not negatively affect the fitness of T. rangeli.

It is well known that there is a trade-off between reproduction and survival, as reproduction imposes costs on females that translate into a decrease in survival rates (Williams, Reference Williams1966; Tatar, Reference Tatar2010). Therefore, a negative correlation between the number of eggs laid and the life expectancy would be expected, as observed in Culex pipiens (Vézilier et al., Reference Vézilier, Nicot, Gandon and Rivero2012). Interestingly, the infection of C. pipiens with Plasmodium relictum reduces egg production, which in turn prolongs female survival, reinforcing the idea of reproductive costs (Vézilier et al., Reference Vézilier, Nicot, Gandon and Rivero2012). In our study, we found that the number of eggs laid by each individual female was positively correlated to its subsequent survival, regardless of the presence of the parasite. This suggests that in R. prolixus a reduction in fecundity, such as that promoted by T. rangeli infection, does not translate into higher life expectancy. Some species can use the strategy of fecundity compensation when parasite pressure is high by investing more in current reproduction to minimize the fitness loss due to parasitism (Schmid-Hempel, Reference Schmid-Hempel2021). Therefore, the steeper slope of the fecundity–survival relationship of infected females suggests that certain adjustments in the pattern of oviposition of females may occur during the infection, so these females can guarantee that some viable offspring be produced before they die.

The pathological effects promoted by T. rangeli have been widely related. Prolongation of the intermoult period or even interruption of the moulting process, defective ecdysis and increased mortality rates that occur mainly during ecdysis have been observed in different species of Rhodnius experimentally infected (Grewal, Reference Grewal1957; Tobie, Reference Tobie1965; Watkins, Reference Watkins1971; Añez, Reference Añez1984; Cuba Cuba, Reference Cuba Cuba1998; Peterson and Graham, Reference Peterson and Graham2016; Rodrigues et al., Reference Rodrigues, Lorenzo, Martins-Filho, Elliot and Guarneri2016). The parasite is also responsible for reducing the microbiota diversity in the anterior midgut of R. prolixus (Eberhard et al., Reference Eberhard, Klimpel, Guarneri and Tobias2022), which probably affects the insect's fitness. The high parasitaemia in the insect is probably maintained through modulation of the immune system, which is downregulated from the moment the parasite reaches the intestinal tract of the insect (Mello et al., Reference Mello, Nigam, Garcia, Azambuja, Newton and Ratcliffe1999; Whitten et al., Reference Whitten, Mello, Gomes, Nigam, Azambuja, Garcia and Ratcliffe2001; Gomes et al., Reference Gomes, Feder, Garcia and Azambuja2003; Garcia et al., Reference Garcia, Machado and Azambuja2004; Rolandelli et al., Reference Rolandelli, Nascimento, Silva, Rivera-Pomar and Guarneri2021).

Given this scenario, the question that arises is, how is such a pathogenic infection maintained in the insect? Considering all the alterations promoted by the parasite, it would be challenging for infected individuals to reach adulthood, and those who did would produce a very small number of offspring. We hypothesize that the drastic effects promoted by the systemic infection are balanced by a decrease in the number of individuals harbouring parasites in the haemolymph and salivary glands, associated with a high transmission efficiency. Despite the low or even unapparent parasitaemia that T. rangeli promotes in vertebrate hosts, the infection rates of insects fed on infected mice are around 80% (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Pereira and Guarneri2015). However, the percentage of insects with an intestinal infection that develop a systemic infection normally does not exceed 50% (reviewed in Guarneri and Schaub, Reference Guarneri, Schaub, Guarneri and Lorenzo2021). Interestingly, in insects collected in the wild, systemic infection rates are lower, ranging from 1 to 15% (Pifano and Mayer, Reference Pifano and Mayer1949; D'Alessandro and Mandel, Reference D'Alessandro and Mandel1969). This low rate of systemic infections would be relevant in the interaction, as intestinal infections are usually less pathogenic (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Lorenzo, Elliot and Guarneri2010). The transmission of pathogens by means of biting is highly efficient since pathogens are inoculated into the skin of the host. In the case of T. rangeli, an infected R. prolixus nymph can release up to 50 000 parasites during a blood meal, causing mice infection rates of 90% (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Pereira and Guarneri2015). In addition, behavioural alterations promoted by the infection make the infected individuals more active, increasing the number of insects that leave the protection of shelters and try to feed on a vertebrate host (Marliére et al., Reference Marliére, Latorre-Estivalis, Lorenzo, Carrasco, Alves-Silva, Rodrigues, Ferreira, Lara, Lowenberger and Guarneri2015, Reference Marliére, Lorenzo and Guarneri2022). With elevated transmission rates increased by behavioural changes, a small number of individuals developing systemic infections would be sufficient to maintain the circulation of the parasite. Furthermore, it has been shown that T. rangeli-infected insects can transmit parasites to co-specifics when feeding simultaneously on the same host, even if the host is not susceptible to the parasite, such as birds for example (Tobie, Reference Tobie1961; Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Pereira and Guarneri2015). This behaviour would increase the number of individuals harbouring parasites in the intestinal tract and the chances of some of them developing systemic infections, ensuring the parasite transmission.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182022001470

Data availability

Data used in this publication can be accessed in the supplementary material.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Eduardo Fernandes e Silva for his support in the statistical analyses.

Author's contributions

A. A. G. conceived and designed the study. B. D. S. conducted data gathering. A. A. G. performed statistical analyses. B. D. S. and A. A. G. wrote the article.

Financial support

A. A. G. was supported by CNPq productivity grants (grant number 303546/2018-2). This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, FAPEMIG (grant numbers APQ-00569-15 and PPM-00162-17), Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular, INCTEM/CNPq (grant number 465678/2014-9).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this study comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides on the care and use of laboratory animals.

References

Agnew, P and Koella, JC (1997) Virulence, parasite mode of transmission, and host fluctuating asymmetry. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 264, 915.10.1098/rspb.1997.0002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Añez, N (1984) Studies on Trypanosoma rangeli Tejera 1920. VII. Its effect on the survival of infected triatomine bugs. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 79, 249255.10.1590/S0074-02761984000200012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Añez, N and East, JS (1984) Studies on Trypanosoma rangeli Tejera, 1920. II. Its effect on feeding behaviour of triatomine bugs. Acta Tropica 41, 9395.Google ScholarPubMed
Costanzo, KS, Muturi, EJ, Montgomery, AV and Alto, BW (2014) Effect of oral infection of La Crosse virus on survival and fecundity of native Ochlerotatus triseriatus and invasive Stegomyia albopicta. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 28, 7784.10.1111/mve.12018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuba Cuba, CA (1998) Review of biological and diagnostic aspects of Trypanosoma (Herpetosoma) rangeli. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 31, 207220.10.1590/S0037-86821998000200007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Alessandro, A and Mandel, S (1969) Natural infections and behavior of Trypanosoma rangeli and Trypanosoma cruzi in the vector Rhodnius prolixus in Colombia. The Journal of Parasitology 55, 846852.10.2307/3277229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhard, FE, Klimpel, S, Guarneri, AA and Tobias, NJ (2022) Exposure to Trypanosoma parasites induces changes in the microbiome of the Chagas disease vector Rhodnius prolixus. Microbiome 10. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40168-022-01240-z#citeas 10.1186/s40168-022-01240-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eger-Mangrich, I, de Oliveira, M, Grisard, EC, De Souza, W and Steindel, M (2001) Interaction of Trypanosoma rangeli Tejera, 1920 with different cell lines in vitro. Parasitology Research 87, 505509.10.1007/s004360000356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellet, MR, Lorenzo, MG, Elliot, SL, Carrasco, D and Guarneri, AA (2014) Effects of infection by Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli on the reproductive performance of the vector Rhodnius prolixus. PLoS ONE 9, e105255.10.1371/journal.pone.0105255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, LL, Lorenzo, MG, Elliot, SL and Guarneri, AA (2010) A standardizable protocol for infection of Rhodnius prolixus with Trypanosoma rangeli, which mimics natural infections and reveals physiological effects of infection upon the insect. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 105, 9197.10.1016/j.jip.2010.05.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, LL, Pereira, MH and Guarneri, AA (2015) Revisiting Trypanosoma rangeli transmission involving susceptible and non-susceptible hosts. PLoS ONE 10, e0140575.10.1371/journal.pone.0140575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, RC, Teixeira, CF, de Sousa, VF and Guarneri, AA (2018) Effect of temperature and vector nutrition on the development and multiplication of Trypanosoma rangeli in Rhodnius prolixus. Parasitology Research 117, 17371744.10.1007/s00436-018-5854-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, LL, Araújo, FFD, Martinelli, PM, Teixeira-Carvalho, A, Alves-Silva, J and Guarneri, AA (2020) New features on the survival of human-infective Trypanosoma rangeli in a murine model: parasite accumulation is observed in lymphoid organs. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14, e0009015.10.1371/journal.pntd.0009015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folly, E, Cunha e Silva, N, Lopes, ACS, Silva-Neto, M and Atella, GC (2003) Trypanosoma rangeli uptakes the main lipoprotein from the hemolymph of its invertebrate host. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 310, 555561.10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, ES, Mello, CB, Azambuja, P and Ribeiro, JMC (1994) Rhodnius prolixus: salivary antihemostatic components decrease with Trypanosoma rangeli infection. Experimental Parasitology 78, 287293.10.1006/expr.1994.1030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, ES, Machado, EM and Azambuja, P (2004) Inhibition of hemocyte microaggregation reactions in Rhodnius prolixus larvae orally infected with Trypanosoma rangeli. Experimental Parasitology 107, 3138.10.1016/j.exppara.2004.03.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes, SAO, Feder, D, Thomas, NE, Garcia, ES and Azambuja, P (1999) Rhodnius prolixus infected with Trypanosoma rangeli: in vivo and in vitro experiments. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 73, 289293.10.1006/jipa.1998.4836CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes, SAO, Feder, D, Garcia, ES and Azambuja, P (2003) Suppression of the prophenoloxidase system in Rhodnius prolixus orally infected with Trypanosoma rangeli. Journal of Insect Physiology 49, 829837.10.1016/S0022-1910(03)00133-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gondim, KC, Atella, GC, Pontes, EG and Majerowicz, D (2018) Lipid metabolism in insect disease vectors. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 101, 108123.10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.08.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grewal, MS (1956) Trypanosoma rangeli Tejera, 1920, in its vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 50, 301302.Google Scholar
Grewal, MS (1957) Pathogenicity of Trypanosoma rangeli Tejera, 1920 in the invertebrate host. Experimental Parasitology 6, 123130.10.1016/0014-4894(57)90010-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarneri, AA (2020) Infecting triatomines with trypanosomes. In Michels, PAM, Ginger, ML and Zilberstein, D (eds), Trypanosomatids. Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Humana Press, pp. 6979.10.1007/978-1-0716-0294-2_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarneri, AA and Lorenzo, MG (2017) Triatomine physiology in the context of trypanosome infection. Journal of Insect Physiology 97, 6676.10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.07.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarneri, AA and Schaub, GA (2021) Interaction of triatomines with their bacterial microbiota and trypanosomes. In Guarneri, A and Lorenzo, M (eds), Triatominae – The Biology of Chagas Disease Vectors. Cham, CH: Springer Nature, pp. 345386.10.1007/978-3-030-64548-9_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guhl, F and Vallejo, GA (2003) Trypanosoma (Herpetosoma) rangeli Tejera, 1920: an updated review. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 98, 435442.10.1590/S0074-02762003000400001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halekoh, U, Højsgaard, S and Yan, J (2006) The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. Journal of Statistical Software 15, 111.10.18637/jss.v015.i02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciel-de-Freitas, R, Koella, JC and Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R (2011) Lower survival rate, longevity and fecundity of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) females orally challenged with dengue virus serotype 2. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 105, 452458.10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.05.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maia Da Silva, F, Junqueira, ACV, Campaner, M, Rodrigues, AC, Crisante, G, Ramirez, LE, Cabalero, ZCE, Monteiro, FA, Coura, JR, Añez, N and Teixeira, MMG (2007) Comparative phylogeography of Trypanosoma rangeli and Rhodnius (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) supports a long coexistence of parasite lineages and their sympatric vectors. Molecular Ecology 16, 33613373.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03371.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marliére, NP, Latorre-Estivalis, JM, Lorenzo, MG, Carrasco, D, Alves-Silva, J, Rodrigues, JO, Ferreira, LL, Lara, LM, Lowenberger, C and Guarneri, AA (2015) Trypanosomes modify the behavior of their insect hosts: effects on locomotion and on the expression of a related gene. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003973.10.1371/journal.pntd.0003973CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marliére, NP, Lorenzo, MG and Guarneri, AA (2022) Trypanosoma rangeli infection increases the exposure and predation endured by Rhodnius prolixus. Parasitology 149, 155160.10.1017/S0031182021001682CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mello, CB, Nigam, Y, Garcia, ES, Azambuja, P, Newton, RP and Ratcliffe, NA (1999) Studies on a haemolymph lectin isolated from Rhodnius prolixus and its interaction with Trypanosoma rangeli. Experimental Parasitology 91, 289296.10.1006/expr.1998.4385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osorio, Y, Travi, BL, Palma, GI and Saravia, NG (1995) Infectivity of Trypanosoma rangeli in a promonocytic mammalian cell line. The Journal of Parasitology 81, 687693.10.2307/3283955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paim, RM, Pereira, MH, Araújo, RN, Gontijo, NF and Guarneri, AA (2013) The interaction between Trypanosoma rangeli and the nitrophorins in the salivary glands of the triatomine Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera; Reduviidae). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 43, 229236.10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.12.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, JK and Graham, AL (2016) What is the ‘true’ effect of Trypanosoma rangeli on its triatomine bug vector? Journal of Vector Ecology 41, 2733.10.1111/jvec.12190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pifano, F and Mayer, M (1949) Hallazgo de formas evolutivas del Trypanosoma rangeli en el jugo de la trompa de Rhodnius prolixus de Venezuela. Archivos Venezolanos de Patología Tropical y Parasitología Médica 2, 153158.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, JD, Lorenzo, MG, Martins-Filho, OA, Elliot, SL and Guarneri, AA (2016) Temperature and parasite life-history are important modulators of the outcome of Trypanosoma rangeliRhodnius prolixus interactions. Parasitology 143, 14591468.10.1017/S0031182016001062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolandelli, A, Nascimento, AE, Silva, LS, Rivera-Pomar, R and Guarneri, AA (2021) Modulation of IMD, Toll, and Jak/STAT immune pathways genes in the fat body of Rhodnius prolixus during Trypanosoma rangeli infection. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 848. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2020.598526/full?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitterGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid-Hempel, P (2021) Evolutionary Parasitology: The Integrated Study of Infections, Immunology, Ecology, and Genetics, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198832140.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottelius, J (1987) Neuraminidase fluorescence test for the differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 38, 323327.Google ScholarPubMed
Stewart, AD, Logsdon, JM and Kelley, SE (2005) An empirical study of the evolution of virulence under both horizontal and vertical transmission. Evolution 59, 730739.Google ScholarPubMed
Styer, LM, Meola, MA and Kramer, LD (2007) West Nile virus infection decreases fecundity of Culex tarsalis females. Journal of Medical Entomology 44, 10741085.10.1093/jmedent/44.6.1074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatar, M (2010) Reproductive aging in invertebrate genetic models. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1204, 149155.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05522.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobie, EJ (1961) Experimental transmission and biological comparison of strains of Trypanosoma rangeli. Experimental Parasitology 11, 19.10.1016/0014-4894(61)90002-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobie, EJ (1965) Biological factors influencing transmission of Trypanosoma rangeli by Rhodnius prolixus. Journal of Parasitology 51, 837841.10.2307/3276172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urrea, DA, Guhl, F, Herrera, CP, Falla, A, Carranza, JC, Cuba-Cuba, C, Triana-Chávez, O, Grisard, EC and Vallejo, GA (2011) Sequence analysis of the spliced-leader intergenic region (SL-IR) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) of Trypanosoma rangeli strains isolated from Rhodnius ecuadoriensis, R. colombiensis, R. pallescens and R. prolixus suggests a degree of co-evolution between parasites and vectors. Acta Tropica 120, 5966.10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vézilier, J, Nicot, A, Gandon, S and Rivero, A (2012) Plasmodium infection decreases fecundity and increases survival of mosquitoes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 40334041.10.1098/rspb.2012.1394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, R (1971) Histology of Rhodnius prolixus infected with Trypanosoma rangeli. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 17, 5966.10.1016/0022-2011(71)90126-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitten, MMA, Mello, CB, Gomes, SAO, Nigam, Y, Azambuja, P, Garcia, ES and Ratcliffe, NA (2001) Role of superoxide and reactive nitrogen intermediates in Rhodnius prolixus (Reduviidae)/Trypanosoma rangeli interactions. Experimental Parasitology 98, 4457.10.1006/expr.2001.4615CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, GC (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. The American Naturalist 100, 687690.10.1086/282461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, C and Von Wechmar, MB (1995) The effects of two viruses on the metamorphosis, fecundity, and longevity of the green stinkbug, Nezara viridula. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 65, 174178.10.1006/jipa.1995.1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Amount of blood ingested by Rhodnius prolixus adults is affected by sex and Trypanosoma rangeli infection. Bars show the mean ± s.e. of the weekly amount of blood ingested (see Table 1 for significance values; n = 8 males and n = 8 females for control group, n = 13 males and n = 13 females for infected group). M, male; F, female; C, control; I, infected.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Blood ingested throughout adult life by Rhodnius prolixus infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli. Data are shown as the weekly average amount of blood ingested. Female control, n = 9; male control, n = 9; female infected, n = 14; male infected, n = 12.

Figure 2

Table 1. Variables of the generalized estimating equations GEEs with significant effects on the amount of blood ingested by Rhodnius prolixus infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli (n = 8 males and n = 8 females, for control group, n = 13 males and n = 13 females for infected group).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Reproductive success of Rhodnius prolixus is highly affected by Trypanosoma rangeli infection. (A) Number of eggs. (B) Hatching rates. (C) Infertile eggs (see Table 2 for significance values; n = 8 for control group, n = 13 for infected group).

Figure 4

Table 2. Variables of the generalized estimating equations GEEs with significant effects on the number of eggs laid by Rhodnius prolixus females infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli (n = 8 for control group, n = 13 for infected group).

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Trypanosoma rangeli infection decreases the life expectancy of Rhodnius prolixus females (log-rank, P = 0.01; n = 13 for control group, n = 15 for infected group).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Life expectancy-fecundity trade-off in Rhodnius prolixus infected or not with Trypanosoma rangeli. The raw plot of the number of eggs that R. prolixus females laid against their survival. Filled circles show uninfected female; empty squares represent infected females. The linear regression of triatomine survival against the number of eggs each female laid was plotted using a full line for uninfected females and a dashed line for infected ones (Spearman's r = 0.65, P = 0.01 for uninfected females; r = 0.73, P = 0.002 for infected females; n = 13 for control group, n = 15 for infected group).

Supplementary material: File

da Silva and Guarneri supplementary material

da Silva and Guarneri supplementary material

Download da Silva and Guarneri supplementary material(File)
File 58.1 KB