Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T16:47:10.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unimagining Song: Making Kin in the Vocal Scene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

Chris Tonelli
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The task set out for us in this curated section of the Yearbook is, from the perspective I present here, problematic. We are invited to consider utterances on the boundaries between speech and song, and I cannot help thinking that this is like being asked to consider bodies at the border between the air and Canada. Though the terms “speech” and “song” both have numerous meanings, speech generally refers to something relatively concrete: the use of the human voice to convey linguistic meaning. The term speech is like the term air; it refers to something intangible but still concrete. Song, on the other hand, is like Canada. It is a reification. How do we address the space between something concrete and something imagined? Song's borders lie at a variety of distinct perceived locations. Unlike with speech, we cannot objectively determine the line between song and non-song. Even if no one shares your sense of where the borders of song lie, no one has the authority to claim you are wrong. Others may be correct to deem your judgment as culturally inappropriate in a given context, but not objectively untrue. If I hear all speech as song, you cannot prove me wrong. If you see all running as dance, I have no solid ground to assert that it's not. We can quibble over intention and the importance of shared cultural conceptions, but ultimately there is no objectively verifiable way to confirm an utterance as song.

Type
Speech, Song, and in-Between
Information
Yearbook for Traditional Music , Volume 49 , 2017 , pp. 149 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 By The International Council for Traditional Music

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

This essay does not do justice to the complexity of distinct definitions of what constitutes speech. My argument here depends on a definition of speech that takes speech to be a medium for the transmission of messages. What makes speech verifiable as speech and more than mere reification is the presence of patterns that can be verified as shared conveyors of meaning. While there may be a case to be made for the existence of speech that cannot be objectively determined as speech, this case would not overshadow the broader distinction I am trying to point to here. Speech and song would remain distinct in this regard, at least in terms of degree.

References

References Cited

Blonk, Jaap 1992a “Jaap Blonk—Der Minister 1.” Video clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRI6HsTLAjU (added by synthfreek, 30 October 2009; accessed 30 September 2016).Google Scholar
1992b “Jaap Blonk—Der Minister II.” Video clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_SrPEf5hcO (added by x2364, 6 February 2011; accessed 30 September 2016).Google Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana 1999 Horrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cusick, Suzanne 1999 “On Musical Performances of Gender and Sex.” In Audible Traces, ed. Elaine Barkin and Lydia Hamessley, 25–48. Los Angeles, CA: Carciofoli Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Dutton, Paul 1992 “Beyond Doo-Wop or How I Learned Hank Williams was Avant-Garde.” Musicworks 54:8–19.Google Scholar
2012 “The Speech-Music Continuum.” In Listening Up, Writing Down, and Looking Beyond: Interfaces of the Oral, Written, and Visual, ed. Susan Gingell and Wendy Roy, 123–4. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Eidsheim, Nina 2014 “Race and the Aesthetics of Vocal Timbre.” In Rethinking Difference in Music Scholarship, ed. Olivia Bloechl, Melanie Lowe, and Jeffrey Kallberg, 338–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna 2016 Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
List, George 1963 “The Boundaries of Speech and Song.” Ethnomusicology 7/1:1–16. doi:10.2307/924141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques 2010 Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. New York: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. Mark 2014 “A Sound Bursts Out of Me: An Interview with Paul Dutton.” Jacket2: https://jacket2.org/interviews/sound-bursts-out-me (accessed 21 August 2017).Google Scholar
Tonelli, Chris 2016 “Ableism and the Reception of Improvised Soundsinging.” Music and Politics 10/2. doi: 10.3998/mp.9460447.0010.204.Google Scholar