Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T10:12:23.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fumigation with Methyl Bromide—Applications in the Poultry Industry—a Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

E. G. Harry  and
W. Burns Brown
E. G. Harry
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, England*
W. Burns Brown
Affiliation:
Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Slough, Bucks., England
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , July 1974 , pp. 193 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, J. S., Taylor, A. L. and Swanson, L. E., 1943. Fumigation of soil with methyl bromide as a means of desroying infective stages and intermediate hosts of some internal parasites of mammals. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. D.C. 10: 4–6Google Scholar
Bridges, R. G., 1955. N-methylation as a result of fumigating wheat with methyl bromide. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 6: 261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns-Brown, W. and Heseltine, H. K., 1964. Fumigation tests for small scale treatments. Int. Pest. Control. 6: 11–15Google Scholar
Clapham, P. A., 1950. On sterilising land against poultry parasites. J. Helminth. 24: 137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, S. A. and King, D. F., 1955. The effectiveness of methyl bromide in sterlizing poultry litter. Poult. Sci. 34: 595–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzendaner, M. E., 1965. Bromide residues in chicken tissues and eggs from ingestion of methyl bromide fumigated food. J. Agric. Fd. Chem. 13: 349–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. F. and Tucker, J. F., 1965. The epizootology of Salmonella menston infection of fowls and the effect of feeding poultry food artificially infected with Salmonella. Br. Poult. Sci. 6: 251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harry, E. G., Burns-Brown, W. and Goodship, G., 1972 The disinfecting activity of methyl bromide on various microbes and infected materials under contrslled conditions. J. appl. Bact. 35: 485–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harry, E. G., Burns-Brown, W. and Goodship, G., 1973. The influence of temperature and moisture on the disinfecting activity of methyl bromide on infected poultry litter. J. appl. Bact. 36: 343–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermans, K. H., 1968. Thesis Faculteit der Diergeneeskunde, Urtecht. p.p., 95+suppl. (Vet. Bull 1968, 39 Abs. 19)Google Scholar
Heuser, S. G. and Scudamore, K. A., 1970. Selective determination of ionised bromide or organic bromide in foodstuffs by gas liquid chromatography with special reference to fumigant residues. Pestic Sci. 1: 244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton-Smith, C., Taylor, E. L. and Turtle, E. E., (1940). Ammonia fumigation for coccidial disinfection. Vet. Rec. 52: 829–832Google Scholar
Johnson, F., 1945. The effect of chemical soil treatments on the development of wheat mosaic. Ohio J. Sci. 45: 125–128Google Scholar
Long, P. L., Burns-Brown, W. and Goodship, G., 1972. The effect of methyl bromide on coccidial oocysts determined under controlled conditions. Vet. Rec. 90: 562–567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maag, T. A. and Schmittle, S. C., 1962. The effect of methyl bromide upon Salmonella pullorum. Am. J. Vet. Res. 23: 1289–1293Google ScholarPubMed
McKeen, C. D., 1954. Methyl bromide as a soil fumigant for controlling soil-borne pathogens and certain other organisms in vegetable seedbeds. Canad. J. Bact. 32: 101–115Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 1972. Fumigation with methyl bromide. H.M.S.O. LondonGoogle Scholar
Samberg, Y., Baroutchieva, M. and Aronovici, A., 1966. Studies on the efficacy of fumigation with formaldehyde and methyl bromide against various poultry pathogens. Refuah. Vet. 23: 170–174Google Scholar
Schmittle, S. C., 1955. Studies on methyl bromide. 1. The efficacy of methyl bromide fumigation of Newcastle disease virus. Poult. Sci. 34: 1219–1220Google Scholar
Scudamore, K. A. and Heuser, S. G., 1970. Residual free methyl bromide in fumigated commodities. Pestl. Sci. 1: 14–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. Williams 1971. The epizootiology of Salmonella infection in poultry. Poultry disease and World Economy. Edited by Gordon, R. F. and Freeman, B. M.Br. Poult. Sci. Edinburgh, pp. 37–46Google Scholar
Thompson, R. H., 1966. A review of the properties and usage of methyl bromide as a fumigant. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1: 363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, J. F., Harry, E. G. and Wainman, H. E. 1974(a). The effect of fumigation with methyl bromide or formaldehyde on the infectivity of poultry house litter naturally contaminated with S. virchow. Brit. Vet. J. (In press)Google Scholar
Tucker, J. F., Burns-Brown, W. and Goodship, G. 1974(b). Fumigation with methyl bromide of poultry food artifically contaminated with Salmonella. Brit. Poult. Sci. (In press)Google Scholar
Whelton, R., Phaff, H. J., Mrak, E. M. and Fisher, C. D., 1946. Control of microbiological food spoilage by fumigation with epoxides. Food Ind. 23–25, 174-176, 318-320Google ScholarPubMed
Winteringham, F. P. W., 1955. The possible toxicological and nutritional significance of fumigating wheat with methyl bromide. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 6: 269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winteringham, F. P. W., Harrison, A., Bridges, R. G. and Bridges, P. R., 1955. Nature of methyl bromide residues in fumigated wheat. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 6: 251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar