Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:46:30.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feed efficiency changes accompanying selection for body weight in chickens and quail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

H.L. Marks
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, SEPRL, c/o University of Georgia, 107 Livestock-Poultry Building, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Get access

Abstract

Feed efficiency data for growth selected and unselected and also stocks divergently selected for body weight were reviewed with special emphasis on changes immediately after hatching. Examination of feed efficiency differences between genetically diverse stocks from hatch to market age normally reveal only small differences in the efficiency of feed utilization. On the other hand, differences in feed intake appear to be the dominant factor in growth-related changes of these genetically diverse stocks. However, when data were segmented into periods which allowed investigation of differences at early ages, especially immediately after hatching, major differences in feed efficiency between genetically diverse groups were observed.

These data indicate that feed efficiency plays a more important role in explaining genetic differences in growth than indicated by previous investigations. The appearance of the greatest differences between genetically diverse stocks immediately after hatching indicates that early feed efficiency changes may allow for greater subsequent feed intake. Therefore, it appears that changes in early feed efficiency along with changes in feed intake both play major roles in explaining genetic differences in growth. The role of feed efficiency is apparently obscured by the maintenance requirements associated with large body sizes of selected stocks when measurements are obtained at older ages.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbato, G.F., Siegel, P.B. and Cherry, J.A. (1983) Inheritance of body weight and associated traits in young chickens. Zeitschrift für Tiertzüchtung Zuchtungsbiologie 100: 350360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, W.H. and Marks, H.L. (1982) Growth hormone and prolactin levels in non-selected and selected broiler lines of chickens from hatch to 8 weeks of age. Growth 46: 283295Google Scholar
Chambers, J.R., Gavora, J.S. and Fortin, A. (1981) Genetic changes in meat-type chickens in the last twenty years. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61: 555563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.R. and Lin, C.Y. (1988) Age-constant versus weight-constant feed consumption and efficiency in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 67: 565576CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darden, J.R. and Marks, H.L. (1988) Divergent selection for growth in Japanese quail under split and complete nutritional environments. 1. Genetic and correlated responses to selection. Poultry Science 67: 519529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmans, G.C. (1987) Growth, body composition and feed intake. World's Poultry Science Journal 43: 208227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, T.W. and Bohren, B.B. (1954) An analysis of feed efficiency among breeds of chickens and its relationship to rate of growth. Poultry Science 33: 549561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guill, R.A. and Washburn, K.W. (1974) Genetic changes in efficiency of feed utilization of chicks maintaining body weight constant. Poultry Science 53: 11461154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, S., Scanes, C.G., Chadwick, A. and Bolton, N.J. (1979) Growth hormone and prolactin secretion in growing domestic fowl: influence of sex and breed. British Poultry Science 20: 8090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendricks, W.A. (1931) Fitting the curve of diminishing increments to the feed consumption–live weight growth curves. Science 74: 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, C.W. and Jull, M.A. (1948) A study of the inheritance of feed utilization efficiency in the growing domestic fowl. Poultry Science 27: 2439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, M.A. and Titus, H.W. (1928) Growth of chickens in relation to feed consumption. Journal of Agricultural Research 36: 541550Google Scholar
Kinney, T.B. (1969) A summary of reported estimates of heritabilities and of genetic and phenotypic correlations for traits of chickens. Agriculture Handbook 363, USDA, 49ppGoogle Scholar
Leenstra, F.R. and Pit, R. (1987) Fat deposition in a broiler sire strain. 2. Comparisons among lines selected for less abdominal fat, lower feed conversion ratio, and higher body weight after restricted and ad libitum feeding. Poultry Science 66: 193202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, H.L. (1978) Growth curve changes associated with long-term selection for body weight in Japanese quail. Growth 42: 129140Google ScholarPubMed
Marks, H.L. (1979) Growth rate and feed intake of selected and non-selected broilers. Growth 43: 8090Google Scholar
Marks, H.L. (1980a) Water and feed intake of selected and non-selected broilers under ad libitum and restricted feeding. Growth 44: 205219Google Scholar
Marks, H.L. (1980b) Early feed intake and conversion of selected and non-selected broilers. Poultry Science 59: 11671171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, H.L. (1980c) Feed efficiency of selected and non-selected Japanese quail lines. Poultry Science 59: 610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, H.L. (1981a) Role of water in regulating feed intake and feed efficiency of broilers. Poultry Science 60: 698707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, H.L. (1981b) Selection environment influences on feed and water intake of Japanese quail following long-term selection for 4-week body weight. Poultry Science 60: 25712580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, H.L. (1989) Long-term selection for 4-week body weight in Japanese quail following modification of the selection environment. Poultry Science 68: 455459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, H.L. (1991) Divergent selection for growth in Japanese quail under split and complete nutritional environments. 5. Feed intake and efficiency patterns following 19 generations of selection. Poultry Science 70: 10471056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J.D. and Marks, H.L. (1983) Thyroid activity of selected, non-selected and dwarf broiler lines. Poultry Science 62: 17211724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J.C. and Siegel, P.B. (1983) A review of genetical and physiological effects of selection in meat-type poultry. Animal Breeding Abstracts 51: 8794Google Scholar
McNabb, F.M.A., Dunnington, E.A., Freeman, T.B. and Siegel, P.B. (1989) Thyroid hormones and growth patterns of embryonic and posthatch chickens from lines selected for high and low juvenile body weight. Growth, Development and Aging 53: 8792Google ScholarPubMed
Nir, I., Harvey, S., Cherry, J.A., Dunnington, E.A., Klandorf, H. and Siegel, P.B. (1987) Growth-associated traits in paternal and F1 populations of chickens under different feeding programs. 4. Growth and thyroid hormones. Poultry Science 66: 3237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nir, I., Nitsan, Z., Dror, Y. and Shapira, N. (1978) Influence of overfeeding on growth, obesity and intestinal tract in young chicks of light and heavy breeds. British Journal of Nutrition 39: 2735CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proudman, J.A., Mellan, W.J. and Anderson, D.L. (1970) Utilization of feed in fast and slow growing lines of chickens. Poultry Science 49: 961972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pym, R.A.E. (1985) Direct and correlated responses to selection for improved food efficiencies. In: Poultry Genetics and Breeding, Longman Group, HarlowGoogle Scholar
Pym, R.A.E. and Nicholls, P.J. (1979) Selection for food conversion in broilers: direct and correlated response to selection for body weight gain, food consumption and food conversion ratio. British Poultry Science 20: 7386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanes, C.G., Dunnington, E.A., Buonomo, F.C., Donoghue, D.J. and Siegel, P.B. (1989) Plasma concentrations of insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) in dwarf and normal chickens of high and low weight selected lines. Growth, Development and Aging 53: 151157Google ScholarPubMed
Siegel, P.B. (1962) Selection for body weight at eight weeks of age. 1. Short term response and heritabilities. Poultry Science 41: 954962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, P.B. and Wisman, E.L. (1966) Selection for body weight at eight weeks of age. 6. Changes in appetite and feed utilization. Poultry Science 45: 13911397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C.H., Blow, W.L., Cockerham, G.C. and Glazener, E.W. (1958) The heritability of body weight, gain, feed consumption, and feed conversion in broilers. Poultry Science 37: 862869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, K.W. (1990) Effect of restricted feeding on fatness, efficiency and the relationship between fatness and efficiency in broilers. Poultry Science 69: 502508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S.P. (1969) Genetic aspects of feed efficiency in broilers. Poultry Science 48: 487495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed