Al-Rawi, B. and Craig, J. V. (1975). Agonistic behaviour of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird. App. Anim. Ethol. 2: 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al-Rawi, B.Craig, J. V. and Adams, A. W. (1976). Agonistic behaviour and egg production of caged layers: Genetic strain and group size effects. Poultry Sci. 55: 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoff, F. H. and Siegel, P. B. (1977). Crowing and mating behaviours in lines of chickens. App. Anim. Ethol. 3: 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoff, F. H.Siegel, P. B. and Van Krey, H. P. (1978a). Hypothalmic uptake of [3H]-testosterone in chickens differing in mating frequency. Physiol. and Behav. 20: 803.Google Scholar

Benoff, F. H.Siegel, P. B. and Van Krey, H. P. (1978b). Testosaterone determintions in lines of chickens selected for differential mating frequency. Horm. and Behav. 10: 246.Google Scholar

Bernier, P. E., Parker, J. E. and Arscott, G. H. (1975a). Selection for ataxia in Delawares. Poultry Sci. 54: 1732.Google Scholar

Bernier, P. E.Arscott, G. H. and Parker, J. E. (1975b). Influence of genotype and of maganese supplementation on incidence of ataxia in Delawares. Poultry Sci. 54: 1731.Google Scholar

Bohren, B. B. (1950). A sex linked nervous disorder in the fowl and its linkage relationship. Genetics 55: 655Google Scholar

Bruckner, G. D.Insko, W. M. and Henry, A. H. (1945). Abnormal appetite of laying hens in feeding experiments. Poultry Sci. 24: 120.Google Scholar

Cole, R. K. (1958). Paroxysm—A sex linked lethal in the fowl. Poultry Sci. 37: 1194.Google Scholar

Cole, R. K. (1961). Paroxysm—A sex linked lethal in the fowl. With a note on the xl lethal. Jour. Hered. 52: 46.Google Scholar

Cook, W. T. and Siegel, P. B. (1973). Interrelationship of comb loci and mating behaviour in chickens. Can. Jour. Genet. Cytol. 15: 533.Google Scholar

Cook, W. T. and Siegel, P. B. (1974) Social variables and divergent selection for mating behaviour of male chickens. Anim. Behav. 22: 390.Google Scholar

Cook, W. T.Siegel, P. B. and Hinkelmann, K. (1972). Genetic analyses of male mating behaviour in chickens. 2. Crosses among selected and control population. Behav. Genet. 2: 289.Google Scholar

Craig, J. V. (1968). Correlated responses in body weight and egg production traits in chickens selected for social dominance. Poultry Sci. 47: 1033.Google Scholar

Craig, J. V. (1978). Aggressive behaviour of chickens: Some effects of social and physical environments. Proc. 27th National Breeder's RoundtableU.S.A. (in press).Google Scholar

Craig, J. V. and Toth, A. (1969). Productivity of pullets influence by genetic selection for social dominance ability and by stability of flock membership. Poultry Sci. 48: 1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, J. V.Ortman, L. L. and Guhl, A. M. (1965). Genetic selection for social dominance ability in chickens. Anim. Behav. 13: 114.Google Scholar

Craig, J. V.Al-Rawi, B. and Kratzer, D. D. (1977). Social status and sex-ratio effects on mating frequency of cockerels. Poultry Sci. 56: 772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Craig, J. V.Jan, M. L.Polley, C. R. and Bhagwat, A. L. (1975). Changes in relative aggressiveness and early social dominance associated with selection for early egg production in chickens. Poultry Sci. 54: 1647.Google Scholar

Crawford, R. D. (1969). A new mutant causing epileptiform seizures in domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 48: 1799.Google Scholar

Crawford, R. D. (1970). Epileptiform seizures in domestic fowl. Jour. Hered. 61: 185.Google Scholar

Crawford, R. D. (1973). Further observations on the association of peck order and plumage patterns in the Fayoumi. Poultry Sci. 52: 897.Google Scholar

Crawford, R. D. and Smyth, J. R. (1961). Social behaviour and sexual behaviour as related to plumage patterns in the Fayoumi. Poultry Sci. 40: 1390.Google Scholar

Crawford, R. D. and Smyth, J. R. (1965). The influence of comb genotype on mating behaviour in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 44: 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cutler, I. E. (1925). Reptilian fowls. Jour. Hered. 16: 352.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1858). The Origin of Species. John Murray, London.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1875). The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication, 2nd edition. John Murray, London.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H. (1970). Frustration in the fowl. In Aspects of Poultry Behaviour. ed. Freeman, B. M., and Gordon, R. F.Bemb Sympos. 6. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Duncan, I. J. H.Savory, C. J. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1978). Observations on the reproductive behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. App. Anim. Ethol. 4: 29.Google Scholar

Ehrman, L. and Parsons, P. A. (1976). The Genetics of Behaviour. Sinauer Assoc., Inc. Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1970). Ethology: The Biology of Behaviour. Holt, Rinehardt and Winston, New York.Google Scholar

Etches, R. J. and Hawes, R. O. (1973). A summary of linkage relationships and a revised linkage map of the chicken. Can. Jour. Genet. Cytol. 15: 553.Google Scholar

Faure, J. M. (1975). Etude de liaisons entre comportement en open field et emotivite chez le jeune poussin. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 7: 194.Google Scholar

Faure, J. M. (1977a). Effet d' heterosis dens le comportement agonistique du coq. Biol. Behav. 2: 181.Google Scholar

Faure, J. M. (1977b). Relations entre l'activite en open field l'aptitude a la dominance chez le coq. Biol. Behav. 2: 193.Google Scholar

Faure, J. M. (1977c). Relations entre la croissance et l'activite en open field chez la Poule. 1. Effet de la selection pour l'activite en open field sur la croissance en poids et la conformation. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 9: 241.Google Scholar

Faure, J. M. and Folmer, J. C. (1975). Etude genetique de l'activite precoce en open field du jeune poussin. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 7: 123.Google Scholar

Faure, J. M. and Ricard, F. H. (1977). Relations entre la croissance et l'activite en open field chez la Poule. 2. Effet de la selection pour le poids vif sur l'activite en open field. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 9: 247.Google Scholar

Ferguson, W. (1968). Abnormal behaviour in domestic birds. In Abnormal Behaviour in Animals, ed. Fox, M. W., W. B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Fischer, G. J. (1969). Heritability in the following response of White Leghorns. Jour. Genet. Psychol. 114: 215.Google Scholar

Fischer, G. J. (1975). The behaviour of chickens. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals 3rd edition. ed. Hafez, E. S. E.Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Frankham, R. and Weiss, G. M. (1969). Changes in relative aggressiveness of lines selected for part-record egg production under floor housing. Poultry Sci. 48: 1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, J. L. and Thompson, W. R. (1978). Genetic Basis of Behaviour C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar

Gallup, G. G. Jr. (1974). Genetic influences on tonic immobility in chickens. Anim. Lear. and Behav. 2: 145.Google Scholar

Galpern, I. L. and Dukhno, Z. (1974). Sexual behaviour estimation of hens and roosters and use of this trait in breeding for increasing their productivity. Proc. 15th World Poultry Cong. p. 259.Google Scholar

Godfrey, E. F.Bohren, B. B. and Jaap, R. G. (1953). “Jittery” a sex linked nervous disorder in the chick. Jour. Hered. 44: 108.Google Scholar

Goodale, H. D.Sanborn, R. and White, D. (1920). Broodiness in the domestic fowl. Mass. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 199.Google Scholar

Goodwin, K. F.Hutt, F. B. and Cole, R. K. (1950). A sex linked lethal gene in the fowl. Science. 112: 460.Google Scholar

Gottier, R. F. (1968). The dominance-submission hierarchy in the social behaviour of the domestic chicken. Jour. Genet. Psychol. 112: 205.Google Scholar

Graves, H. B. and Siegel, P. B. (1968). Chicks response to an imprinting stimulus: Heterosis and evolution. Science. 160: 329.Google Scholar

Graves, H. B. and Siegel, P. B. (1969). Bidirectional selection for response of Gallus gallus chicks to an imprinting situation. Anim. Behav. 17: 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, W. B. (1976). Plasma steroid tendency, social environment and Eimeria necatrix infection. Poultry Sci. 55: 1508.Google Scholar

Gross, W. B. and Siegel, P. B. (1973). Effect of social stress and steroids on antibody production. Avian Diseases. 17: 807.Google Scholar

Gross, W. B. and Siegel, P. B. (1975). Immune responses to Escherichia coli. Amer. Jour. Vet. Res. 36: 568.Google Scholar

Guhl, A. M. (1953). Social behaviour of the domestic fowl. Kan. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 73.Google Scholar

Guhl, A. M. and Warren, D. C. (1946). Number of offspring sired by cockerels related to social dominance in chickens. Poultry Sci. 25: 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guhl, A. M.Collias, N. A. and Allee, W. C. (1945). Mating behaviour and the social hierarchy in small flocks of White Leghorns. Physiol. Zool. 18: 365.Google Scholar

Guhl, A. M.Craig, J. V. and Mueller, C. D. (1960). Selective breeding for aggressiveness in chickens. Poultry Sci. 39: 970.Google Scholar

Guill, R. A. and Washburn, K. W. (1974). Genetic changes in efficiency feed utilization of chickens maintaining body weight constant. Poultry Sci. 53: 1146.Google Scholar

Hagger, R. C. (1977). Phaenotypische und genetische Untersuchungen zur Futterverwertung der Legehenne. Diss., Techn. Univ. Zurich.Google Scholar

Hale, E. B. (1962). Domestication and the evolution of behaviour. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals, 2nd edition. ed. Hafez, E. S. E.Bailliere, Tindall and Cox, London.Google Scholar

Hall, R. D. and Gross, W. B. (1975). Effect of social stress and inherited plasma corticosterone levels in chickens on populations of the northern feather mite. Jour. Parasitology. 61: 1096.Google Scholar

Hansen, R. S. (1976). Nervousness and hysteria of mature female chickens. Poultry Sci. 55: 531.Google Scholar

Hawkes, R. O.Etches, R. J. and Buckland, R. B. (1973). Tipsy: A new mutant in the domestic fowl. Jour. Hered. 64: 310.Google Scholar

Heil, G. (1976). Schatzung der genetischen Parameter fur de Futterverwertung von Legehennen in Gruppenhafigen und ihre Beziehungen zu ander Leistungs und Eiqualitatsmerkmalen. Diss., Techn. Univ. Munchen.Google Scholar

Hughes, B. O. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1977). Agonistic behaviour in domestic hens: The influence of housing method and group size. Anim Behav. 25: 1056.Google Scholar

Hurnick, J. F. (1978). Feeding behaviour and feed conversion in laying hens. Proc. 27th National Breeder's Roundtable,U.S.A. (in press).Google Scholar

Hutt, F. B. (1949). Genetics of the Fowl. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Hutt, F. B. (1960). New loci in the sex chromosome of the fowl. Heredity, 15: 97.Google Scholar

Hutt, F. B. and Child, G. B. (1934). Congenital tremor in young chicks. Jour. Hered. 25: 341.Google Scholar

Hyams, E. (1972). Animals in the Service of Man: 10,000 Years of Domestication. J. M. Dent and Son, Ltd. London.Google Scholar

James, J. W. and Foenander, F. (1961). Social behaviour studies in domestic animals. 1. Hens in laying cages. Australian Jour. Agr. Res. 12: 1239.Google Scholar

Kilgour, R. (1975). Aspects of animal behaviour in relation to intensive production. Proc. 3rd Conf. Australian Chicken Meat Fed. p. 96.Google Scholar

King, S. C. and Bray, D. F. (1959). Competition of strains of chickens in separate versus intermingled flocks. Poultry Sci. 38: 86.Google Scholar

Kinney, T. B. Jr. (1969). A summary of reported estimates of heritabilities and of genetic and phenotypic correlations for traits of chickens. USDA Agr. Handbook. No. 363.Google Scholar

Knowlton, F. L. (1929). Congenital loco in chicks. Oregon Agr Expt. Sta. Bull. 253.Google Scholar

Kuenzel, W. J. and Rubenstein, J. B. (1974). Behavioural and physiological studies of a convulsing mutant chicken. Jour. Expt. Zool. 187: 63.Google Scholar

Laundauer, W. and Dunn, L. C. (1930). Studies on the creeper fowl. 1. Genetics. Jour. Genet. 23: 397.Google Scholar

Lill, A. (1966a). A review of non-random mating behaviour in domestic poultry. Poultry Rev. 6: 51.Google Scholar

Lill, A. (1966b). Some observations on social organization and non-random mating in captive Burmese Red Jungle fowl. Behav. 26: 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lill, A. (1968). An analysis of sexual isolation in the domestic fowl. 1. The basis of homogamy in males. Behav. 30: 107.Google Scholar

Lowry, D. C. and Abplanalp, H. (1972). Social dominance difference, given limited access to common food, between hens selected and unselected for increased egg production. Brit. Poultry Sci. 13: 365.Google Scholar

Marks, H. L. and Siegel, P. B. (1971). Evaluation of the Athens-Canadian randombred population. 1. Time trends at two locations. Poultry Sci. 50: 1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Markson, L. M.Carnaghan, R. B. A. and Young, G. B. (1959). Familial cerebellar degeneration and atrophy—A sex linked disease affecting Light Sussex Pullets. Jour. Comp. Path. 69: 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marler, P.Kreith, M. and Willis, E. (1962). An analysis of testosterone induced crowing in young domestic cockerels. Anim. Behav. 10: 48.Google Scholar

Masui, K. (1956). Long tailed fowl—Japanese breeds of fowl. Inter. Genetics Sympos. Exhib., Sci. Council of Japan. p. 89.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1974). Behaviour programmes and evolutionary strategies. Amer. Scientist. 62: 650.Google Scholar

McBride, G. (1958a). The relationship between aggressiveness, peck order and some characters of selective significance in the domestic hen. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 27: 56.Google Scholar

McBride, G. (1958b). The environment and animal breeding problems. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 26: 349.Google Scholar

McBride, G. (1962a). Behaviour and a theory of poultry husbandry. Proc. 12th World Poultry Cong. p. 102.Google Scholar

McBride, G. (1962b). The interactions between genotypes and housing environments in the domestic hen. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 4: 95.Google Scholar

McBride, G. (1970). The social control of behaviour in fowls. In Aspects of Poultry Behaviour. ed. Freeman, B. M. and Gordon, R. F., BEMB Sympos. 6. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

McBride, G.Parker, I. P. and Foenander, F. (1969). The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 2: 127.Google Scholar

McCollom, R. E.Siegel, P. B. and Van Krey, H. P. (1971). Responses to androgen in lines of chickens selected for mating behaviour. Horm. and Behav. 2: 31.Google Scholar

McGibbon, W. H. (1973). Crazy—a nervous disorder in Ancona chickens. Jour. Hered. 64: 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGibbon, W. H. (1974). Pirouette: A behavourial mutant in the domestic fowl. Jour. Hered. 65: 124.Google Scholar

McGibbon, W. H. (1976). Floor laying—A heritable and environmentally influenced trait of the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 55: 765.Google Scholar

Mueller, C. D. (1952). Linkage relationships of the gene for “shaker” in chickens. Poultry Sci. 31: 105.Google Scholar

Murphy, L. B. (1977). Responses of domestic fowl to novel food and objects. App. Anim. Ethol. 3: 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, L. B. and Duncan, I. J. H. (1977). Attempts to modify the response of domestic fowl toward human beings. 1. The association of human contact with food reward. App. Anim. Ethol. 3: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ookawa, T. (1977). Behavoural and electroencephalographic manifestations of avian epilepsy: A review of the literature. Poultry Sci. 56: 773.Google Scholar

Ortman, L. L. and Craig, J. V. (1968). Social dominance in chickens modified by genetic selection—physiological mechanisms. Anim. Behav. 16: 33.Google Scholar

Petitjean, M. J. and Cochez, L. P. (1966). Subfertility of cocks homozygous for “R” gene (rose comb). Proc. 13th World Poultry Cong. p. 121.Google Scholar

Phillips, R. E. and Siegel, P. B. (1966). Development of fear in two closely related genetic lines. Anim. Behav. 14: 84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Polley, C. R.Craig, J. V. and Bhagwat, A. L. (1974). Crowding and agonistic behaviour: A curvilinear relationship? Poultry Sci. 53: 1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Price, D. J.Smith, A. D. and Teskey, R. B. (1966). A sex linked respiratory defect in chickens. Poultry Sci. 45: 423.Google Scholar

Quadeer, M. A.Craig, J. V.Kemp, K. E. and Dayton, A. D. (1977). Selection for egg mass in different social environments. 1. Estimation of some parameters in the foundation stock. Poultry Sci. 56: 1522.Google Scholar

Quadeer, M. A.Craig, J. V.Kemp, K. E. and Dayton, A. D. (1977). Selection for egg mass in different social environments. 2. Estimation of parameters in selected populations. Poultry Sci. 55: 1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rupert, A. (1949). The Art of Cockfighting. Devin-Adair, New York.Google Scholar

Sanctuary, W. C. (1932). A study in avian behaviour to determine the nature and persistency of the order of dominance in the domestic fowl and to relate these to certain physiological reactions. M.S. Thesis, Univ. M.A.Google Scholar

Savory, C. J.Wood-Gush, D. G. M. and Duncan, I. J. H. (1978). Feeding behaviour in a population of domestic fowls in the wild. App. Anim. Ethol. 4: 13.Google Scholar

Scott, H. M.Morrill, C. C.Albert, J. O. and Roberts, E. (1950). The “shaker” fowl—A sex linked semi-lethal nervous disorder. Jour. Hered. 41: 254.Google Scholar

Sefton, A. E. and Crawford, R. D. (1967). Social behaviour as related to down pattern genotype in Fayoumi domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 46: 1499.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B. (1959). The influence of dominance rank on sexual activity of chickens. Va. Jour. Sci. 10: 240.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B. (1965). Genetics of behaviour: Selection for mating ability of chickens. Genetics. 52: 1269.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B. (1970). Behaviour-genetics. Bioscience. 20: 605.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B. (1972). Genetic analyses of male mating behaviour in chickens. 1. Artificial selection. Anim. Behav. 20: 564.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B. (1976). Social behaviour of the fowl. Poultry Sci. 55: 5.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B. and Dudley, D. S. (1963). Comb type, behaviour, and body weight in chickens. Poultry Sci. 42: 516.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B. and Siegel, H. S. (1963). The correlated response of relative aggressiveness to selection for body weight and breast angle in chickens. Poultry Sci. 42: 1208.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B.Phillips, R. E. and Folsom, E. F. (1965). Genetic variation in the crow of adult chickens. Behav. 24: 229.Google Scholar

Siegel, P. B.Bessei, W. and Grauvogl, A. (1978). Verhaltensmerkmale bei der zuchtung von Geflugel. Hohenheimer Arbeiten 93. (Tierische Produktion).Google Scholar

Silber, J. and Merat, P. (1974). Genetic study of broken eggs in laying batteries. Proc. 15th World Poultry Cong. p. 266.Google Scholar

Smith, P. and Daniel, C. (1975). The Chicken Book. Little, Brown and Co., Toronto.Google Scholar

Somes, R. G. Jr. (1968). Sleepy-eye, an eyelid mutant of the fowl. Jour. Hered. 59: 375.Google Scholar

Somes, R. G. Jr. (1973). Linkage relationships in domestic fowl. Jour. Hered. 64: 217.Google Scholar

Trail, J. C. M. (1962). The indigenous poultry of Uganda. The fertility, hatchability and chick mortality compared with European breeds. Poultry Sci. 41: 1271.Google Scholar

Tindell, D. and Craig, J. V. (1959). Effects of social competition on laying house performance in the chicken. Poultry Sci. 38: 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tindell, D. and Arze, C. G. (1965). Sexual maturity of male chickens selected for mating ability. Poultry Sci. 44: 70.Google Scholar

Van Krey, H. P.Siegel, P. B. and Jones, J.H (1977). The regulation of overt sexual behaviour in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 56: 1447.Google Scholar

Warren, D. C. (1942). The crossbreeding of poultry. Kan. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 52.Google Scholar

Waters, N. F. and Bywaters, J. H. (1943). A lethal embryonic wing mutation in the domestic fowl. Jour. Hered. 34: 213.Google Scholar

Williams, C. G.Siegel, P.B. and Gross, W. B. (1977). Social strife in cockerel flocks during the formation of peck rights. App. Anim. Ethol. 3: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winterfield, R. W. (1953). Avian cerebellar hypoplasia and degeneration. Jour. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 123: 136.Google Scholar

Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1955). The behaviour of the domestic chicken: A review of the literature. Brit. Jour. Anim. Behav. 3: 81.Google Scholar

Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1958). Genetic and experimental factors affecting the libido of cockerels. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 22: 6.Google Scholar

Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1959). Genetic differences in reproductive behaviour of domestic cockerels. Anat. Rec. 134: 658.Google Scholar

Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1971). The Behaviour of the Domestic Fowl. Heinemann Educ Books Ltd., London.Google Scholar

Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1972). Strain differences in response to suboptimal stimuli in the fowl. Anim. Behav. 20: 72.Google Scholar