Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:10:57.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ahemeral lighting and reproductive efficiency in breeding flocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

M.M. Shanawany
M.M. Shanawany
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierwissenschaften, Technischen Universität Munchen, 8050 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The paper addresses all feasible applications of long ahemeral light cycles in breeding flocks and reviews the limited published studies. Long cycles are likely to be most beneficial towards the end of the production cycle – when eggshell quality is often poor – and at the beginning of lay to increase the proportion of eggs exceeding the minimum weight for incubation. Published reports show an improvement in both fertility and hatchability of breeding flocks under long cycles.

Keywords

Ahemeralfertilityhatchabilitychick weightdomestic fowlpheasantslight cyclephotoperiod
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , November 1993 , pp. 213 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, W.L. and Nestor, K.E. (1979) Reproductive traits of first eggs of clutches vs. other clutch positions in turkeys. Poultry Science 58: 257–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, A.G. and Ringer, R.K. (1987) Changes in ring-necked pheasants' (Phasianus colchius) egg formation time, oviposition lag time and egg sequence length due to ahemeral light:dark cycles. Poultry Science 66: 231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, A.G., Balander, R., Flegal, C.J. and Ringer, R.K. (1987) Ahemeral light–dark cycles and egg production parameters of ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchius). Poultry Science 66: 258–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byerly, T.C. and Moore, O.K. (1941) Clutch length in relation to period of illumination in the domestic fowl. Poultry Science 20: 387–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahaner, A. and Abplanalp, H. (1979) Changes in egg production and egg intervals under selection for high egg number under 22 hour day cycles of artificial lighting. Poultry Science 58: 757–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasenko, G.M., Hardin, R.T. and Robinson, F.E. (1992) Relationship of hen age and egg sequence position with fertility, hatchability, viability and preincubation embryonic development in broiler breeders. Poultry Science 71: 1374–1383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Förster, A., Kalm, E. and Flock, D.K. (1992) Influence of egg sequence position on fertility and hatchability in two brown egg lines. Proceedings of XIX World's Poultry Science Congress,The Netherlands, Vol. 1, p. 702Google Scholar
Foster, W.H. (1972) Selection for egg production under ahemeral light–dark cycles of abnormal lengths. In: Egg Formation and Production (Eds Freeman, B.M. and Lake, P.E.), Carfax, Oxford, pp. 161–183Google Scholar
Foster, W.H. (1985) The genetics of ovulation efficiency. In: Poultry Genetics and Breeding (Eds Hill, W.G., Manson, J.M. and Hewitt, D.), Longman, Harlow, pp. 157–168Google Scholar
Foster, W.H. (1986) Selection for increased egg mass under ahemeral light-dark cycles. British Poultry Science 27: 339–344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibaraki, K, Yoshida, S., Kumimatsu, Y. and Kojima, Y. (1985) Effect of 28-h ahemeral light–dark cycles on egg production and shell qualities of laying hens. I. Effect on oviposition time, rate of lay and egg yolk weight. Japanese Poultry Science 22: 181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, S., Okamoto, S. and Matsuo, T. (1981) Effects of ahemeral light and dark cycles on egg production and oviposition rhythm in the quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 52: 39–46Google Scholar
Kojima, Y., Ashida, H., Kumimatsu, Y. and Ibaraki, K. (1986) Entrainment of oviposition under 28 hour ahemeral light–dark cycle in laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 23: 10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojima, Y., Itoh, M., Kumimatsu, Y. and Ibarkai, K. (1988) Entrainment of ovipositions under 28 hour ahemeral light–dark cycles in laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 25: 312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosin, I.L. and Mun, A.B. (1960) Clutch size, oviposition time and ‘floor’ eggs as factors in turkey hatchability. Poultry Science 39: 82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacassagne, L., Sauveur, B. and De Reviers, M. (1973) Effects of an ahemeral light cycle of 28 h on fertility and embryonic mortality in the domestic hen (Gallus gallus). Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, D. Sciences Naturelles 277: 1201–1204Google Scholar
Marks, H.L., Lucas, L.M. and Godfrey, E.F. (1968) Selection for egg production in the domestic fowl under normal and ‘short day’ environments. Poultry Science 47: 1170–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, T.R. (1973) The effects of ahemeral light and dark cycles on egg production. Poultry Science 52: 423–445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T.R. (1978) The photoperiodic effect of ahemeral light–dark cycles which entrain circadian rhythms. British Poultry Science 19: 207–212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T.R. (1979) The influence of light on ovulation in domestic birds. In: Animal Reproduction (BARC Symposium in Agricultural Research), Wiley, New York, pp. 307–322Google Scholar
Morris, T.R. and Bhatti, B.M. (1978) Entrainment of oviposition in the fowl using bright and dim cycles. British Poultry Science 19: 341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, M. (1992) Ahemeral light–dark cycles as a selection environment for laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 29: 335–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, M., Komiyama, T. and Nirasawa, K. (1985) The effects of ahemeral light–dark on egg production and oviposition cycle in the domestic fowl. Bulletin of National Institute of Animal Industry (Japan) 43: 1–9Google Scholar
Naito, M., Nirasawa, K. and Komiyama, T. (1986) The effect of 23 h light–dark cycle on egg production and egg characteristics in the domestic fowl. Japanese Poultry Science 23: 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, M., Nirasawa, K. and Oishi, T. (1990) Duration of egg formation in hens selected for increased rate of lay under 23 h and 24 h light–dark cycles. British Poultry Science 31: 371–375CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proudfoot, F.G. (1980) The effects of dietary protein levels, ahemeral light and dark cycles and intermittent photoperiods on the performance of chicken broiler parent genotypes. Poultry Science 59: 1258–1267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, F.E., Hardin, R.T., Robinson, N.A. and Williams, B.J. (1991) The influence of egg sequence position on fertility, embryo viability and embryo weight in broiler breeders. Poultry Science 70: 760–765CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanawany, M.M. (1982) The effect of ahemeral light and dark cycles on the performance of laying pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 38: 120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1987) Hatching weight in relation to egg weight in domestic birds. World's Poultry Science Journal 43: 107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1990a) Ahemeral light cycles and egg quality. World's Poultry Science Journal 46: 101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1990b) Reproductive performance of broiler breeders under ahemeral light cycles. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 54: 111–114Google Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. (1992) Response of layers to ahemeral light cycles incorporating age at application and changes in effective photoperiod. World's Poultry Science Journal 48: 156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanawany, M.M. and Pirchner, F. (1992) Performance of breeding flocks under ahemeral lighting. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 56: 227–229Google Scholar
Shanawany, M.M., Morris, T.R. and Pirchner, F. (1993) Influence of clutch length on the response to ahemeral lighting late in lay. British Poultry Science (in press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, C.J., Rose, S.P. and Bampton, P.R. (1987) Production responsens of laying hens to 28 h bright:dim cycles using different light intensity ratios and a 24 h temperature regimen. British Poultry Science 28: 207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar