Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:53:17.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Can Liberal States Avoid Unwanted Immigration? Self-Limited Sovereignty and Guest Worker Recruitment in Switzerland and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

Antje Ellermann
Antje Ellermann*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Email: antje.ellermann@ubc.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Advanced democracies, it is commonly argued, are unable to prevent unwanted immigration because their sovereignty is “self-limited” by virtue of their normative, legal, and economic liberalism. This article challenges this claim by examining a critical test case that is at the heart of self-limited sovereignty arguments: guest worker recruitment in postwar Switzerland and West Germany. The author shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the unintended settlement of guest workers was not a universal given but instead was far less extensive in Switzerland than in West Germany. This difference in exposure to unwanted immigration, she argues, was the result of path-dependent processes that can be traced back to the inception of each country’s recruitment program. Whereas West German officials made no concerted effort to control settlement until the program’s termination, Swiss policy from its beginning was marked by state-enforced worker rotation and the prevention of family unification. To account for these critical differences in policy design, the article argues that each guest worker system was fundamentally shaped by two sets of factors. First, program design varied depending on whether or not political elites could draw policy lessons from past experience with temporary worker programs. Where past recruitment had resulted in unwanted settlement, as had been the case in Switzerland, political elites sought to adopt policy provisions designed to prevent the past from repeating itself. Where past policy failure was absent, as was the case in West Germany, policymakers were less concerned with preempting settlement. Second, recruitment policy reflected the degree to which policymakers were able to operate autonomously from cross-cutting interests. Whereas the West German government could pursue recruitment relatively insulated from both business and popular pressure, Swiss policymakers had to repeatedly accommodate both sets of actors, in the process devising a recruitment system firmly premised on the principle of worker rotation.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 491 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2013 

References

References

Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney, eds. 1989. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. New York, N.Y.: Sage.Google Scholar
Argast, Regula. 2007. Staatsbürgerschaft und Nation: Ausschliessung und Integration in der Schweiz, 1848–1933 [Nationality and Nation: Exclusion and Integration in Switzerland, 1848–1933]. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argast, Regula. 2009. “An Unholy Alliance: Swiss Citizenship between Local Legal Tradition, Federal Laissez-Faire, and Ethno-National Rejection of Foreigners, 1848–1933.” European Review of History 16, no. 4: 503–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, Jean-François. 1978. “Switzerland.” In Butler, David and Ranney, Austin, eds., Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Bade, Klaus J. 1982. “Kulturkampf' auf dem Arbeitsmarkt: Bismarcks ‘Polenpolitik’ 1885-1890.” In Pflanze, Olaf, ed., Innenpolitische Probleme des BismarckReiches [Domestic Problems of the Bismarck Empire]. Munich, Germany: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Baker, Kendrick L., Dalton, Russell J., and Hildebrandt, Kai. 1981. Germany Transformed: Political Culture and the New Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Basok, Tanya. 2000. “He Came, He Saw, He … Stayed: Guest Worker Programmes and the Issue of Non-Return.” International Migration 38, no. 2: 216–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy, Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, and Vohs, Kathleen. 2001. “Bad Is Stronger Than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5, no. 4: 323–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, John. 1990. Importing Foreign Workers: A Comparison of German and American Policy. New York, N.Y.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, Siegfried. 1982. Heimatvertreibung, DDR-Flucht, Gastarbeiterzuwanderung: Wanderungsströme und Wanderungspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Expulsion, Escape from the GDR, and Guestworker Immigration: Immigration Flows and Immigration Politics in the Federal Republic of Germany]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Blaas, Wolfgang. 1992. “The Swiss Model: Corporatism or Liberal Capitalism.” In Pakkarinen, Jukka, Pohjol, Matti, and Rowthorn, Bob, eds., Social Corporatism: A Superior Economic System? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boscardin, Lucio. 1962. Die italienische Einwanderung in die Schweiz mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Jahre 1946-1959 [Italian Immigration to Switzerland with a Particular Focus on the Years 1946-1959]. Zurich, Switzerland: Polygraphischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buomberger, Thomas. 2004. Kampf gegen unerwünschte Fremde: Von James Schwarzenbach bis Christoph Blocher [Fight against Unwanted Strangers: From James Schwarzenbach to Christoph Blocher]. Zurich, Switzerland: Orell Füssli.Google Scholar
Castles, Steven. 1985. “The Guests Who Stayed: The Debate on ‘Foreigners Policy’ in the German Federal Republic.” International Migration Review 19, no. 3: 517–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Castles, Steven. 2006. “Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection?” International Migration Review 40, no. 4: 741–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerutti, Mauro. 2005. “La Politique Migratoire de la Suisse, 1945–1970.” In Mahnig, Hans, ed., Histoire de la Politique de Migration, d'Asile et d'Integration en Suisse Depuis 1948 [Political History of Migration, Asylum, and Integration to Switzerland since 1948]. Zurich, Switzerland: Seismo.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A., Martin, Philip L., and Hollifield, James F., eds. 2004. Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, 2nd ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Deffner, Ingo. 2005. Die Reaktionen der Parteien und der Öffentlichkeit auf die Wahlerfolge der NDP in der zweiten Hälfte der 60er Jahre [Responses by Political Parties and the Public to the Electoral Victories of the NDP in the Latter Half of the 1960s]. Norderstedt, Germany: Grin Verlag.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S. 2000. Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 1995 “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States.” International Migration Review 19, no. 4: 881–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Ferrer, Amparo. 2007. “The Process of Family Reunification among Original Guest-Workers in Germany.” Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 19, no. 1: 10–33.Google Scholar
Gruner, Erich. 1956. Die Wirtschaftsverbände in der Demokratie [The Economic Associations of Democracy]. Erlenbach-Zürich, Switzerland: Rentsch.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2007. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe.” International Organization 61, no. 2: 399–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25, no. 3: 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, Ulrich. 2001. Geschichte der Ausländerpolitik in Deutschland: Saisonarbeiter, Zwangsarbeiter, Gastarbeiter, Flüchtlinge [History of Foreigner Policy in Germany: Seasonal Workers, Forced Laborers, Guestworkers, Refugees]. Munich, Germany: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 1992. Immigrants, Markets, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hunn, Karin. 2005. Nächstes Jahr kehren wir zurück . .. Die Geschichte der türkischen “Gastarbeiter” in der Bundesrepublik [Next Year We Will Go Back … The History of Turkish “Guestworkers” in the Federal Republik]. Göttingen, Germany: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M. 1992. Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Nicole. 2003. “America's De Facto Guest Workers: Lessons from Germany's Gastarbeiter for U.S. Immigration Reform.” Fordham International Law Journal 27, no. 4: 1568–1662.Google Scholar
Janmatt, Jan German. 2006. “Civic Culture in Western and Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Sociology 47, no. 3: 363–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. “Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration.” World Politics 50, no. 2 (January): 266–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltefleiter, Werner. 1970. “The Impact of the Election of 1969 and the Formation of the New Government on the German Party System.” Comparative Politics 2, no. 4: 593–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamber, Esther, and Schranz, Mario. 2000. “Die Wahrnehmung des Fremden in deutsch-schweizerischen Medien.” In Hoffmann-Nowotny, Hans-Joachim, ed., Das Fremde in der Schweiz: Ergebnisse soziologischer Forschung [Otherness in Switzerland: Results of Sociological Research]. Zurich, Switzerland: Seismo Verlag.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1987a. Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1987b. Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Alan, and Freeman, Gary. 2005. “Public Opinion in the EU on Immigration from Outside the Community.” Journal of Common Market Studies 43, no. 4: 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielmansegg, Peter Graf. 1990. “The Basic Law: Response to the Past or Design for the Future?” Occasional Paper 1. Washington, D.C.: German Historical Institute.Google Scholar
Knortz, Heike. 2008. Diplomatische Tauschgeschäfte: Gastarbeiter in der westdeutschen Diplomatie und Beschäftigungspolitik 1953—1973 [Diplomatic Barter Trade: Guestworkers and West German Diplomacy and Labor Politics 1953-1973]. Cologne, Germany: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1982. “The Structure of the Swiss Political System.” In Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C., eds., Patterns of Corporatist Policymaking. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. Le système politique Suisse [The Swiss Political System]. Paris, France: Economica.Google Scholar
Kühne, Peter. 2000. “The Federal Republic of Germany: Ambivalent Promotion of Immigrants' Interests.” In Penninx, Rinus and Roosbald, Judith, eds., Trade Unions, Immigration and Immigrants in Europe, 1960–1993. New York, N.Y.: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Kury, Patrick. 2003. Über Fremde reden: Überfremdungsdiskurs und Ausgrenzung in der Schweiz, 1900—1945 [Talking about Strangers: Overforeignization Discourse and Exclusion in Switzerland, 1900-1945]. Zurich, Switzerland: Chronos.Google Scholar
Lahav, Gallya. 2004. Immigration and Politics in the New Europe: Reinventing Borders. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucassen, Leo. 2001. “A Many-headed Monster: The Evolution of the Passport System in the Netherlands and Germany in the Long Nineteenth Century.” In Caplan, Jane and Torpey, John, eds., Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mahnig, Hans, and Piguet, Etienne. 2004. “Die Immigrationspolitik der Schweiz von 1948 bis 1998.” In Wicker, Hans-Rudolph, Fibbi, Rosita, and Haug, Werner, eds., Migration und die Schweiz [Migration and Switzerland], 2nd ed. Zurich, Switzerland: Seismo.Google Scholar
Mahnig, Hans, and Wimmer, Andreas. 2003. “Integration without Immigrant Policy: The Case of Switzerland.” In Heckmann, Friedrich and Schnapper, Dominique, eds., The Integration of Immigrants in European Societies: National Differences and Trends of Convergence. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Martin, Philip L. 2001. “There Is Nothing More Permanent Than Temporary Foreign Workers.” Backgrounder. Washington, D.C.: Center for Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
Martin, Philip L., and Miller, Mark J.. 1980. “Guestworkers: Lessons from Western Europe.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33, no. 3: 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Peter J. 1992. “Policy Learning and Failure.” Journal of Public Policy 12, no. 4: 331–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Money, Jeannette. 1999. Fences and Neighbors: The Political Geography of Immigration Control. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidhart, Leonhard. 1970. Plebiszit undpluralitäre Demokratie: eine Analyse der Funktion des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums [Plebiscite and Pluralist Democracy: Analyzing the Function of the Swiss Legislative Referendum]. Bern, Switzerland: Francke.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. 1990. “Immigration and Judicial Review in the Federal Republic of Germany.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 23, no. 35: 35–85.Google Scholar
Niederberger, Josef Martin. 1982. “Die politisch-administrative Regelung von Einwanderung und Aufenthalt von Ausländern in der Schweiz: Strukturen, Prozesse, Wirkungen.” In Hoffmann-Nowotny, Hans-Joachim and Hondrich, Karl-Otto, eds., Ausländer in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und in der Schweiz: Segregation und Integration [Foreigners in the Federal Republic of Germany and in Switzerland: Segregation and Integration]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Niehr, Thomas. 2004. Der Streit um Migration in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich: Eine vergleichende diskursgeschichtliche Untersuchung [The Fight about Migration in the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland, and Austria: A Comparative Historical Discourse Analysis]. Heidelberg, Germany: Winter.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, Cord. 1993. “Rotationsprinzip und Rückkehrorientierung im Ein-wanderungsprozess: ‘Gastarbeit’ in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.” M.A. thesis, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45, no. 4 (July): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piguet, Etienne. 2006a. “Economy versus the People? Swiss Immigration Policy between Economic Demand, Xenophobia, and International Constraint.” In Giugni, Marco G. and Passy, Florence, eds., Dialogues on Migration Policy. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Piguet, Etienne. 2006b. Einwanderungsland Schweiz: Fünf Jahrzehnte halb geöffnete Gren- zen [Switzerland, Country of Immigration: Five Decades of Half Open Bor-ders]. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.Google Scholar
Reichert, Joshua S., and Massey, Douglas S.. 1982. “Guestworker Programs: Evidence from Europe and the United States and Some Implications for U.S. Policy.” Population Research and Policy Review 1, no. 1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reutter, Werner. 2001. “Verbände zwischen Pluralismus, Korporatismus und Lobbyismus.” In Reutter, Werner and Rütters, Peter, eds., Verbände und Verbandsysteme in Westeuropa [Associations and Association Networks in Western Europe]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohner, Andreas. 2011. “Direct Democracy in the German Länder: History, Institutions, and (Mal)Functions.” C2D Working Paper Series 38. Zurich, Switzerland: Centre for Research on Direct Democracy.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1993. Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning across Time and Space. London, UK: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Rothmayr, Christine. 2001. “Towards the Judicialisation of Swiss Politics?” West European Politics 24, no. 2: 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing Control: Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter Heisler, Barbara. 2000. “Trapped in the Consociational Cage: Trade Unions and Immigration in Switzerland.” In Penninx, Rinus and Roos-bald, Judith, eds., Trade Unions, Immigration and Immigrants in Europe, 1960–1993. New York, N.Y.: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Schönwälder, Karin. 2001. Einwanderung und ethnische Pluralität [Immigration and Ethnic Plurality]. Essen, Germany: Klartext.Google Scholar
Seol, Dong-Hoon, and Skrentny, John D.. 2009. “Why Is There So Little Migrant Settlement in East Asia?” International Migration Review 43, no. 3: 578–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, George. 2007. Migration, Integration und Wachstum:Die Performance und wirtschaftliche Auswirkung der Ausländer in der Schweiz [Migration, Integration and Growth: The Performance and Economic Impact of Foreigners in Switzerland]. Basel, Switzerland: Forschungsstelle für Arbeitsmarkt- und Industrieökonomie.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagendoorn, Louk, and Prior, Markus. 2004. “Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities.” American Political Science Review 98, no. 1: 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N. 2006. “Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information.” Journal of Politics 68, no. 2: 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torpey, John. 2000. The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship, and the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vuilleumier, Marc. 1992. Flüchtlinge und Immigranten in der Schweiz: Ein historischer Überblick [Refugees and Immigrants in Switzerland: A Historical Overview]. Zurich, Switzerland: Pro Helvetia.Google Scholar
Triadafilopoulos, Triadafilos, and Schönwälder, Karen. 2006. “How the Federal Republic Became an Immigration Country: Norms, Politics, and the Failure of West Germany's Guestworker System.” German Politics and Society 24, no. 3: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q 1980. “The Politics of Regulation.” In Wilson, James Q, ed., The Politics of Regulation. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Amt, Auswärtiges. March 20, 1972. Memorandum by Referat V6 to Referat IA4 (V6-80.55)."Aussenpolitische Auswirkungen der Beschäftigung ausländischer Arbeitnehmer in der BRD.” B85, 1031.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher. February 17, 1955. Stenographischer Bericht, 66. Sitzung.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher. February 21, 1973. Anlage zum Protokoll der 3. Sitzung des Innenausschusses. B85, 1031.Google Scholar
Bildzeitung. March 31, 1966. “Gastarbeiter fleissiger als deutsche Arbeiter?” Evangelischer Pressedienst. February 20, 1973. “Proteste gegen die ‘Rotation’ von Gastarbeitern.”Google Scholar
Frankfurter Rundschau. December 20, 1954. “Storch: Kein Facharbeitermangel. Ausländische Arbeitskräfte sollen nicht vor 1957 kommen.”Google Scholar
Frankfurter Rundschau. February 27, 1961. “Mit Kind und Kegel ins Ruhrgebiet: Ausländische Bergleute holen nach einjähriger Trennung ihre Familien nach.”Google Scholar
Frankfurter Rundschau. December 29, 1966. “Gewerkschaft nimmt Gastarbeiter in Schutz.”Google Scholar
Industrie-Kurier. November 19, 1955. “Anwerbung von Italienern ist gesichert: Deutsche Kommission geht nach Mailand.”Google Scholar
Neue Rhein-Ruhr-Zeitung. December 15, 1966. “Figgen: Verträge der Gastarbeiter überprüfen.”Google Scholar
Neue Zürcher Zeitung. November 13, 1946. “Ausländische Arbeitskräfte und Überfremdung.”Google Scholar
Neue Zürcher Zeitung. December 22, 1955. “Italienische Arbeiter für Westdeutschland.”Google Scholar
Neue Zürcher Zeitung. November 21, 1960. “Der Aufenthalt ausländischer Arbeitskräfte.”Google Scholar
Rhein-Zeitung. December 14, 1954. “Kommen Italienische Arbeiter? Die Verhandlungen haben begonnen.”Google Scholar
Stuttgarter Zeitung. January 22, 1973. “Sesshaftwerden von Gastarbeitern unerwünscht.”Google Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung. December 21, 1954. “Fremdarbeiter nur im Bedarfsfall.”Google Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung. November 15, 1966. “Langer Kündigungsschutz nur für wenige Gastarbeiter.”Google Scholar
Bundesamt für Industrie, Gewerbe und Arbeit. March 31, 1953. Memorandum. “Vorsorgliche Massnahmen gegen die Überfremdung des Arbeitsmarktes.” E2001E 1970_217, Bd. 205.Google Scholar
Bundesamt für Industrie, Gewerbe und Arbeit. 1964. Das Problem der auslän-dichen Arbeitskräfte: Bericht der Studienkommission für das Problem der ausländischen Arbeitskräfte. BIGA: Bern.Google Scholar
Eidgenössisches Justiz- und Polizeidepartement. December 12, 1956. Memorandum. “Kreisschreiben an die Polizeidirektionen der Kantone.” E2001 E1970_217 Bd 205.Google Scholar
Eidgenössische Fremdenpolizei. December 28, 1950. Letter to Dr. Heinrich Rothmund, E3/202, “Saisonarbeiter im Baugewerbe. Widerruf von Aufenthaltsbewilligungen.” E2001E 1967_113 Bd.368.Google Scholar
Ständerat. December 8, 1964. Amtliches Bulletin der Bundesversammlung: 9104 Italienische Arbeitskräfte in der Schweiz. Bern: Verbandsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Schweizerische Arbeitgeber-Zeitung. June 20, 1947. “Fremdarbeiter in der Schweiz.”Google Scholar
Schweizerischer Metall- und Uhrenarbeiterverband. June 6, 1946. Internal memorandum. SMUV 05D-0004, Zirkulare.Google Scholar
Schweizerischer Metall- und Uhrenarbeiterverband. August 11, 1955. “Bericht über das Fremdarbeiterproblem in der Maschinen- und Metallindustrie.” SMUV 05D-0015, 1947-1963.Google Scholar
Schweizerischer Metall- und Uhrenarbeiterverband. 1962. “SMUV Vortagswoche Oktober 1961.” SMUV 10B-0008 2/1961.Google Scholar