Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:42:02.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virginia Market-Type Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Cultivar Tolerance and Yield Response to Flumioxazin Preemergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John W. Wilcut ,
Shawn D. Askew ,
William A. Bailey ,
Janet F. Spears  and
Thomas G. Isleib
John W. Wilcut*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Shawn D. Askew
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
William A. Bailey
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Janet F. Spears
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Thomas G. Isleib
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: john_wilcut@ncsu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate response of eight peanut cultivars to flumioxazin applied preemergence (PRE) at 71 g ai/ha. Peanut cultivars evaluated include ‘NC 12C’, ‘NC 7’, ‘VAC 92R’, ‘NC-V 11’, ‘NC 10C’, ‘AT VC 1’, ‘NC 9’, and the experimental breeding line ‘N9001OE’. Visible injury 3 wk after planting in 1996 was 3% or less regardless of cultivar. In 1997, all cultivars were injured 15 to 28% with flumioxazin PRE, except VC 1, which was injured 45%. No visible injury was observed at 5 and 9 wk after planting. Flumioxazin did not influence the incidence of early leaf spot, late leaf spot, southern stem rot, cylindrocladium black rot, or tomato spotted wilt virus. Flumioxazin did not affect percentage of extra-large kernels, sound mature kernels, other kernels, and total yield.

Keywords

Flumioxazinpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L., ‘NC 12C’, ‘NC 7’, ‘VAC 92R’, ‘NC-V 11’, ‘NC 10C’, ‘AT VC 1’, ‘NC 9’, ‘N9001OE’Disease interactionCylindrocladium crotalariae (Loos) Bell and SobersCercospora arachidicola HoriCercosporidium personatum (Berk. and Curt.)Sclerotium rolfsii Saccgrade parametersextra-large kernelssound mature kernelssound splitstotal kernelsother kernelsfancy podsCBR, cylindrocladium black rotDAP, days after plantingELK, extra-large kernelsPPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergenceSMK, sound mature kernelsSS, sound splitsTMSK, total sound mature kernelsTSWV, tomato spotted wilt virusWAP, weeks after planting
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 137 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. J., Norris, A. E., and Hess, F. D. 1994. Synthetic organic chemicals that act through the porphyrin pathway. In Duke, S. O. and Rebeiz, C. A., eds. Porphyric Pesticides: Chemistry, Toxicology, and Pharmaceutical Applications. ACS Symposium Series 559. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp. 18–33.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 1999. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with flumioxazin preemergence. Weed Technol., 13: 594–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., Spears, J. F., Isleib, T. G., and Langston, V. B. 2000. Diclosulam does not influence yields in eight Virginia market-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Weed Technol. 14: 402–405.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J. 1989. Response of peanut cultivars to herbicide treatments. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:28.Google Scholar
Chiteka, Z. A., Gorbet, D. W., Shokes, F. M., Kurcharek, T. A., and Knauft, D. A. 1988. Components of resistance to late leaf spot in peanut. Peanut Sci. 15: 25–30.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. I. Jr., Whitaker, T. B., and Dickens, J. W. 1982. Grading, cleaning, storage, shelling, and marketing of peanuts in the United States. In Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society. pp. 571–623.Google Scholar
Eastin, E. F., Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, and Hicks, T. V. 1993. V-53482 and Zorial systems for weed control in Georgia peanut. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 25:84.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Colburn, A. E. 1996. Flumioxazin for weed control in Texas peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 23: 30–36.Google Scholar
Hau, F. C., Campbell, C. L., and Beute, M. K. 1982. Inoculum distribution and sampling methods for Cylindrocladium crotalariae in a peanut field. Plant Dis. 66: 568–571.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C., Holbrook, C. C., Millinix, B. G. Jr., and Cardina, J. 1992. Response of eight genetically diverse peanut genotypes to chlorimuron. Peanut Sci. 19: 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Spears, J. F. 1997. Peanut production practices. In Jordan, D. L., ed. 1997 Peanut Information. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publ. Ag-331. pp. 7–19.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., Batts, R. B., and York, A. C. 1998. Response of Virginia-type peanut to norflurazon. Peanut Sci. 25: 4–7.Google Scholar
McLean, H. S., Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., Culbreath, A. C., Branch, W. D., and Kvien, C. K. 1994. Peanut variety response to norflurazon. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:33.Google Scholar
Richburg, J. S., Wilcut, J. W., Culbreath, A. K., and Kvien, C. K. 1995. Response of eight peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars to the herbicide AC 263,222. Peanut Sci. 22: 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Kabana, R., Backman, P. A., and Williams, J. C. 1975. Determination of yield losses to Sclerotium rolfsii in peanut fields. Plant Dis. 59: 855–858.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. 1997. Summary of flumioxazin performance in southeastern peanuts. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 50:7.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 177–205.Google Scholar
Yoshida, R., Sakaki, M., Sato, R., Haga, T., Nagano, E., Oshio, H., and Kamoshita, K. 1991. S-53482—anew N-phenyl phthalimide herbicide. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 1: 99–7Google Scholar