Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T21:01:03.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Interference with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Brenda S. Smith ,
Don S. Murray  and
David L. Weeks
Brenda S. Smith
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Don S. Murray
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
David L. Weeks
Affiliation:
Dep. Stat., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the critical period for velvetleaf interference with cotton and to assess the reliability of using weed growth variables as predictors of cotton lint yield losses. An inverse linear relationship existed between velvetleaf dry weight and cotton lint yield. The relationship between the number of velvetleaf main-stem nodes or velvetleaf height with cotton lint yield was best described by quadratic regression equations. Weed dry weight appeared to be the most accurate predictor followed by weed height and by number of velvetleaf main-stem nodes. A nonlinear equation best described percent lint yield loss as a function of critical-period interference intervals.

Keywords

Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ♯3 ABUTHcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Paymaster 145’Prediction modelscompetitioncritical-period interferenceABUTH
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 799 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldrich, R. J. 1987. Predicting crop yield reductions from weeds. Weed Technol. 1:199–206.Google Scholar
2. Alm, D. M., Pike, D. R., Hesketh, J. D., and Stoller, E. W. 1988. Leaf area development in some crop and weed species. Biotronics 17:29–39.Google Scholar
3. Castner, E. P., Murray, D. S., Hackett, N. M., Verhalen, L. M., Weeks, D. I., and Stone, J. F. 1989. Interference of hogpotato (Hoffmanseggia glauca) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:688–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in cotton. Weed Sci. 25:151–158.Google Scholar
5. Cousens, R., Brain, P., O'Donovan, J. T., and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35:720–725.Google Scholar
6. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.Google Scholar
7. Elmore, C. D., Brown, M. A., and Flint, E. P. 1983. Early interference between cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and four weed species. Weed Sci. 31:200–207.Google Scholar
8. Erbach, D. C., Lovely, W. G., and Bockhop, C. W. 1976. Area-of-influence of herbicide granules. Weed Sci. 24:170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1987. Full-season interference of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:813–818.Google Scholar
10. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Schreiber, M. M. 1980. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 28:729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Murray, D. S., Santelmann, P. W., and Davidson, J. M. 1975. Comparative adsorption, desorption, and mobility of dipropetryn and prometryn in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:578–582.Google Scholar
12. Pawlak, J. A., Murray, D. S., and Smith, B. S. 1990. Influence of capsule age on germination of nondormant jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) seed. Weed Technol. 4:31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1985. Relationships between growth and competitiveness of four annual weeds. J. Appl. Ecol. 22:895–905.Google Scholar
14. Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). I. Buffalobur (Solanum rostratum). Weed Sci. 33:810–814.Google Scholar
15. SAS Institute, Inc. 1987. SAS/Stat. Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
16. Schreiber, M. M. 1982. Modeling the biology of weeds for integrated weed management. Weed Sci. Suppl. 30:13–16.Google Scholar
17. Snipes, C. E., Street, J. E., and Walker, R. H. 1987. Interference periods of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:529–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Spencer, N. R. 1984. Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae), history and economic impact in the United States. Econ. Bot. 38:407–416.Google Scholar
19. Weaver, S. E. 1984. Critical period of weed competition in three vegetable crops in relation to management practices. Weed Res. 24:317–325.Google Scholar
20. Weaver, S. E., and Tan, C. S. 1983. Critical period of weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum): Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 31:476–481.Google Scholar
21. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-Crop Competition. A Review. Int. Plant Prot. Cent., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR. p. 83.Google Scholar