Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:22:55.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varietal Tolerance of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Bromoxynil and Triclopyr at Different Growth Stages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dan J. Pantone  and
John B. Baker
Dan J. Pantone
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., La. Agric. Exp. Stn., La. State Univ. Agric. Cent., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
John B. Baker
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., La. Agric. Exp. Stn., La. State Univ. Agric. Cent., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the tolerance of three cultivars of rice (‘Lemont’, ‘Mars', and ‘Tebonnet’) to bromoxynil and triclopyr. The effects of two rates of application (the labeled rate and twice the labeled rate) at three different growth stages (two- to three-leaf stage, four- to five-leaf stage, and panicle initiation) on percent visible injury rating and percent grain yield reduction of rice were investigated. Percent visible injury ratings for triclopyr averaged across all rates and application times, were 15, 16, and 25% (LSD = 3%) for Tebonnet, Mars, and Lemont, respectively, whereas ratings for bromoxynil were 11, 8, and 7% injury (LSD = 2%). Tebonnet was more tolerant than Lemont to triclopyr with an average percent grain yield reduction, across treatments, of 6% compared with 9% for Mars and 12% for Lemont (LSD = 4%). Bromoxynil did not decrease the average yield of any of the three cultivars.

Keywords

Bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitriletriclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acidrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Lemont’, ‘Mars', and ‘Tebonnet’Crop toleranceherbicide phytotoxicityLouisianavarietal susceptibility
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 968 - 974
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, J. B., Dunand, R. T., and Zeringue, F. J. 1988. Rice weed control studies. Louisiana Rice Res. Stn. Annu. Res. Rep. 80:217–234.Google Scholar
2. Baker, J. B., Dunand, R. T., Pantone, D. J., and Downey, T. J. 1989. Rice weed control studies. Louisiana Rice Res. Stn. Annu. Res. Rep. 81:248–270.Google Scholar
3. Baron, J. J., Monaco, T. J., and Mainland, C. M. 1985. Tolerance of highbush and rabbiteye blueberry cultivars to hexazinone. HortScience 20:1074–1075.Google Scholar
4. De Datta, S. K. 1981. Chapter 5, Morphology, growth, and development of the rice plant p. 146–172 in Principles and Practices of Rice Production. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
5. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Comparisons between treatment means, p. 187–214 in Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
6. Griffin, J. L. and Habetz, R. J. 1989. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Griffin, J. L. and Baker, J. B. 1990. Tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars to fenoxaprop, sethoxydim, and haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 38:528–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Guy, C. B., Helms, R. S., and Grove, J. A. 1990. Rice cultivar response to triclopyr. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:124.Google Scholar
9. McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153–155.Google Scholar
10. Poe, R. R., Coyne, D. P., Swisher, B. A., and Clegg, M. D. 1988. Differential Cucurbita spp. tolerance to the herbicide trifluralin. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 113:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. SAS Institute. 1988. The GLM procedure. p. 549–640 in SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
12. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) to acifluorfen and triclopyr applied alone or in mixtures with propanil. Weed Sci. 36:379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:686–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Street, J. E. and Miller, T. C. 1986. Bromoxynil for controlling broadleaf weeds in rice. Res. Rep. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. 11(9): 1–3.Google Scholar
15. Tottmann, D. R., Lupton, F.G.H., and Oliver, R. H. 1984. The tolerance of difenzoquat and diclofop-methyl by winter wheat varieties at different growth stages. Ann. Appl. Biol. 104:151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. p. 42–43 and 249–250 in Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America. Sixth Edition. WSSA, Champaign, Ill. Google Scholar