Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:05:54.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil Factor Effects on Tolerance of Two Corn (Zea mays) Hybrids to Isoxaflutole Plus Flufenacet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lawrence E. Steckel
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
F. William Simmons*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: fsimmons@uiuc.edu

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at three locations in 2000 and 2001 to evaluate what effect soil characteristics have on sensitivity of two corn hybrids to soil-applied isoxaflutole plus flufenacet. Soil types were a Flanagan silt loam with 3.9% organic matter (OM), a Drummer silty clay loam with 5.0% OM, and a Cisne silt loam with 2.1% OM. Soil pH was adjusted to four target levels, < 6.0, 6.0 to 6.5, 6.6 to 7.0, and > 7.0, at each location. Isoxaflutole plus flufenacet treatments consisted of the recommended rate (1 ×) and two times (2 ×), and four times (4 ×) the recommended rates based on soil type. Additional treatments included 1 × and 2 × isoxaflutole plus flufenacet with 1.1 kg/ha atrazine and S-metolachor plus atrazine as a control treatment. Corn hybrid ‘Garst 8366’ (G8366) was more sensitive to soil-applied isoxaflutole plus flufenacet compared with ‘Garst 8600’ (G8600). Corn injury occurred only at two of three locations. Addition of atrazine to the 1 × and 2 × isoxaflutole plus flufenacet treatments showed a trend (P = 0.15) toward increased injury and reduced yield only for the G8366 on the Cisne soil. The 4 × rate of the premixture reduced yield 9 to 49% at two locations. Yields were reduced at the low-OM (2.1%) location, regardless of hybrid or application rate. At two locations, there was a negative linear relationship between soil pH and corn grain yield, particularly at the 4 × rate. Corn visual injury and yield reductions were greatest from herbicide applications to low-OM soils with high pH levels.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C. and Prostak, R. G. 1996. Activity of EXP 31130A in annual weed control in field corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36: 13.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81: 665672.Google Scholar
Forester, H., Schmidt, R. R., and Andree, R. 1997. FOE-5043 a new selective herbicide from the oxyacetamide group. Pflanzenschutz Nachr. Bayer. 50: 105116.Google Scholar
Gajbhiye, V. T. and Gupta, S. 2001. Adsorption-desorption behaviour of flufenacet in five different soils of India. Pest Manag. Sci. 57: 633639.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L., Prisbylla, M. P., Cromartie, T. H., Dagarin, D. P., Howard, S. W., Provan, W. M., Ellis, M. K., Fraser, T., and Mutter, L. C. 1997. The discovery and structural requirements of inhibitors of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenases. Weed Sci. 45: 601609.Google Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75: 153155.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. and Bhowmik, P. C. 2001. Physical and chemical properties of soil influence the sorption of the diketonitrile metabolite of isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. 49: 423430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, S., Bhowmik, P. C., and Xing, B. 1999. Sorption of isoxaflutole by five different soils varying in physical and chemical properties. Pestic. Sci. 55: 935942.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Cramp, S. M., Little, J. P., Veerasedaran, P., Crudace, A. J., and Slater, A. E. 2001. Isoxaflutole: the background to its discovery and the basis of its herbicidal properties. Pest Manag. Sci. 57: 133142.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62: 113124.Google Scholar
Rowe, L. and Penner, D. 1990. Factors affecting choloracetanilide injury to corn. Weed Technol. 4: 904906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8.1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. pp. 235237.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999a. Weed control and corn (Zea Mays) tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13: 713725.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999b. Enhancing margin of selectivity of RPA 201772 in corn (Zea mays) with antidotes. Weed Sci. 47: 492497.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999c. Physiological basis for differential corn (Zea mays) tolerance of four corn hybrids to isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. 47: 631635.Google Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S., Sims, G. K., Wax, L. M., and Hassett, J. J. 2000. Hydrolysis and soil adsorption of the labile herbicide isoxaflutole. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34: 31863190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viger, P. R., V. Eberlein, C., Fuerst, E. P., and Gronwald, J. W. 1991. Effects of CGA-154281 and temperature on metolachlor absorption and metabolism, glutathione content, and glutathione-S transferase activity in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 39: 324328.Google Scholar