Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T12:30:55.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seedling Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) Tolerance to Dithiopyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Darin S. Bevard  and
Thomas L. Watschke
Darin S. Bevard
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Thomas L. Watschke*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: tlw3@psu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dithiopyr was applied to ‘Penneagle’ creeping bentgrass seedlings 2, 4, and 8 wk after emergence (WAE) in separate studies in the summers of 1992 and 1993 to determine seedling tolerance. Dithiopyr emulsifiable concentrate (IEC) was applied at 0.14, 0.28, 0.42, and 0.56 kg ai/ha, and granular (G) dithiopyr (0.1G) was applied at 0.14, 0.21, 0.28, and 0.42 kg/ha. Dithiopyr applied 2 WAE caused unacceptable injury regardless of rate or formulation. Injury was characterized by stunting of plants, leaf tip die-back, yellowing of older leaves, and a visible decline in quality. Injury increased with increasing rate. In 1992, the EC and G formulation of dithiopyr caused similar responses, whereas in the summer of 1993, the EC caused greater turf injury. Dithiopyr applied 4 WAE caused less injury than when applied 2 WAE, and injury was acceptable. Dithiopyr applied 8 WAE only slightly injured creeping bentgrass at the high rate for both formulations in both years.

Keywords

Dithiopyr, S,S-dimethyl 2-(difluoromethyl)-4-(2-methylpropyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarbothioate, creeping bentgrass, Agrostis stolonifera HudsPreemergence herbicidesDCPAsiduronDigitaria ischaemumDIGISEC, emulsifiable concentrateG, granularWAE, weeks after emergenceWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 216 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C. and Bahnson, B. M. 1989. Pre and post emergence smooth crabgrass control with Mon-15151 in cool season turfgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:110.Google Scholar
Bingham, S. W. and Schmidt, R. E. 1983. Turfgrass establishment after application of preemergence herbicides. Agron. J. 75:923–926.Google Scholar
Coats, G. E., Ward, C. Y., and McWhirter, E. C. 1973. Effects of benefin and DCPA on overseeded grasses maintained as putting greens. Weed Sci. 21:528–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juska, F. V. and Hovin, A. W. 1970. Preemergence herbicide effects on the growth of Newport Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) seedlings. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:387–392.Google Scholar
Moshier, L., Turgeon, A. J., and Penner, D. 1976. Effects of glyphosate and siduron on turfgrass establishment. Weed Sci. 24:445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, J. C. 1993. Safety of herbicides on overseeded and newly seeded turfgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:133 Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Wetzel, H.C. and Dernoeden, P. H. 1993. Perennial ryegrass seedling tolerance to dithiopyr. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:97.Google Scholar