Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:09:29.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rice (Oryza sativa) Response to Soil Residues of Selected Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
Daniel B. Reynolds  and
Stephen H. Crawford
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Daniel B. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Stephen H. Crawford
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The potential of alachlor, SAN 582H (Proposed name, dimethenamid), chlorimuron plus metribuzin, clomazone, imazaquin, imazethapyr, metolachlor, sulfentrazone, and trifluralin plus flumetsulam to injure rice the year following application to soybean was evaluated on silty clay and silt loam soils in Louisiana. These herbicides did not cause rice injury or yield reduction. Rice tolerance of the amine salt of 2,4-D or thifensulfuron plus tribenuron applied 0, 7, 14, and 28 d prior to planting was also evaluated on these soils. The amine salt of 2,4-D at 1.1 kg ai/ha injured rice 43 and 52% on silty clay and silt loam soils, respectively, in 1994 when applied the day of planting. In 1995, injury was 78 and 88% on these respective soils at this timing. When applied 7 d or more before planting, 2,4-D amine injured rice in one of four trials. Thifensulfuron plus tribenuron (17 + 9 g ai/ha) injured rice in one of four trials when applied the day of planting, but did not injure rice when applied 7 d before planting. No visual rice injury was observed when 2,4-D amine or thifensulfuron plus tribenuron was applied 14 or 28 d before planting. Rice grain yield was not affected by thifensulfuron plus tribenuron regardless of the interval between application and rice planting. In contrast, rice grain yield was reduced in all trials when 2,4-D amine was applied on the day of planting, and in one of four trials when applied 7 or 14 d before planting.

Keywords

clomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Cypress'soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Deltapine 3627.'Herbicide carryoverherbicide persistencereduced-tillage productionalachlordimethenamid (SAN 582H)chlorimuronclomazoneflumetsulamimazaquinimazethapyrmetolachlormetribuzinsulfentrazonethifensulfuron2,4-D aminetribenurontrifluralinDBP, days before plantingWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 379 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beaty, J. D., Guy, C. B. Jr., Talbert, R. E., and Johnson, D. H. 1991. Simulated carryover of rotational crop herbicides to rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:122.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. H. 1992. Preplant weed control in conservation tillage systems for cotton. In Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference. Nashville, TN. Jan. 7–10, 1992. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. pp. 139–140.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, D. E., Reynolds, D. B., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Evaluation of Harmony Extra as a component of preplant weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:47.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Robinson, J. F. 1989. Metolachlor and alachlor persistence in rice (Oryza sativa) following soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:82–85.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B. Jr., Helms, R. S., and Ashcraft, R. W. 1995. Weed control and crop tolerance to herbicides. In Wells, B. R., ed. Arkansas Rice Research Studies 1994. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series 446, Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. pp. 38–46.Google Scholar
Hancock, H. G. 1995. Sulfentrazone: a broad spectrum herbicide for soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:44–45.Google Scholar
Helms, R. S., Tripp, T. N., Smith, R. J. Jr., Baldwin, F. L., and Hackworth, M. 1989. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to imazaquin residues in soybean (Glycine max) and rice rotation. Weed Technol. 3:513–517.Google Scholar
Huckaba, R. M., Braxton, L. B., Grant, D. L. Hale, D.B., and Porteous, D. J. 1993. Weed control in southern U.S. with Broadstrike herbicide in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:329.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H., Beaty, J. D., Horton, D. K., Talbert, R. E., Guy, C. B., Mattice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1995a. Effects of rotation crop herbicides on rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 43:648–654.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H., Talbert, R. E., and Horton, D. R. 1995b. Carryover potential of imazaquin to cotton, grain sorghum, wheat, rice, and corn. Weed Sci. 43:454–460.Google Scholar
Jordan, D., Barnes, J., and Burns, A. 1995. Soybean, wheat, and grain sorghum weed control research in northeast Louisiana, 1994. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station Mimeo Series No. 102. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center. 217 p.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Reese, K. D. 1992. Effect of soil pH on absorption and persistence of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 40:490–496.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. P., Shaw, D. R., and Rankins, A. Jr. 1995. Flumetsulam dissipation on three Mississippi soils. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:227.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Costello, R. W., and King, C. A. 1995. Weed control programs with sulfentrazone in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:73–74.Google Scholar
Paul, E. A. and Clark, F. E. 1989. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. New York: J. Wiley. 273 p.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. A., Cordes, R. C., Ditmarson, S. C., et al. 1995. Flumetsulam plus chlopryralid-efficacy and crop tolerance in corn. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:1.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D. 1993. Dimethenamid efficacy and tolerance in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:323.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., Mattice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Frans, R. E. 1986. Residual fluometuron levels in three Arkansas soils under continuous cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production. Weed Sci. 34:122–130.Google Scholar
Shea, P. J. 1985. Detoxification of herbicide residues in soil. Weed Sci. 33(Suppl.): 33–41.Google Scholar
Strebe, T. A., Johnson, D. H., Wichert, R. A., Tierney, M. J., and Talbert, R. E. 1995. Effect of flumetsulam on rotational crops planted at various times after application. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:218–219.Google Scholar
Williamson, D. H. 1993. Dimethenamid efficacy and tolerance in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:322.Google Scholar