Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:09:02.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapid necrosis: Implications of environmental conditions and plant growth stage on 2,4-D resistance and effect of other auxinic herbicides in Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2023

Paula Sinigaglia Angonese
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Graduate Group of Plant Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Andrew Rerison Silva de Queiroz
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Graduate Group of Plant Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Liana Sinigaglia Angonese
Affiliation:
Undergraduate Student, School of Agriculture, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Filipi Mesquita Machado
Affiliation:
Undergraduate Student, School of Agriculture, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Richard Napier
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Catarine Markus
Affiliation:
Professor, Crop Science Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Carla A. Delatorre
Affiliation:
Professor, Crop Science Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Aldo Merotto Jr.*
Affiliation:
Professor, Crop Science Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Aldo Merotto Jr., Crop Science Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RG 90040-060, Brazil. Email: merotto@ufrgs.br

Abstract

Resistant plants of Sumatran fleabane with unusual rapid necrosis (RN) symptoms after application of 2,4-D were characterized in previous studies. Field observations indicated variability in the occurrence of the RN caused by 2,4-D, but the causes of the variation are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of environmental conditions, plant growth stage, and simultaneous and sequential herbicide mixtures with other auxin mimics on the occurrence of RN caused by 2,4-D. Application at temperature of 12 C delayed the symptoms and decreased the intensity of the RN but still resulted in plant survival to 2,4-D. The absence of light after herbicide application caused a slight delay in the symptoms, but the production of hydrogen peroxide and the size of the necrosed area were not affected by the light treatments before and after 2,4-D application. Changes in plant photosynthesis through inhibiting photosystem II do not prevent the occurrence of RN symptoms. The auxinic herbicides dicamba, triclopyr, and halauxifen-methyl do not cause RN symptoms and are effective at controlling the resistant biotype when applied without 2,4-D, but the effectiveness of these herbicides was reduced when sprayed on the resistant biotype either together, 4 h, or 24 h after 2,4-D. The RN phenotype does not occur for dicamba and triclopyr, even in advanced plant growth stages and high doses on the resistant biotype. The herbicides dicamba and triclopyr effectively controlled resistant plants, especially when sprayed at the initial growth stages. The results of this study identify environmental effects, plant development effects, and herbicide interactions that interfere with the occurrence of RN symptoms caused by 2,4-D in Sumatran fleabane. These data provide insights about the mechanisms behind the RN symptoms caused by 2,4-D and are important for identifying the causes of variability of the herbicide symptomology and performance under experimental and field conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Charles Geddes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

References

Adegas, FS, Correia, NM, Silva, AF, Concenço, G, Gazziero, DLP, Dalazen, G (2022) Glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean and corn in Brazil: past, present, and future. Adv Weed Sci 40 (Spec1):e0202200102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adegas, FS, Vargas, L, Gazziero, DLP, Karam, D (2017) Impacto econômico da resistência de plantas daninhas a herbicidas no Brasil. Circular Técnica 132Google Scholar
Albrecht, AJP, Pereira, VGC, Souza, CNZ, Zobiole, LHS, Albrecht, LP, Adegas, FS (2020) Multiple resistance of Conyza sumatrensis to three mechanisms of action of herbicides. Acta Sci Agron 42:e42485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, AA, Sadia, S, Ali, HH, Jabran, K, Peerzada, AM, Chauhan, BS (2016) Biology and management of two important Conyza weeds: a global review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2469424710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brabham, CB, Gerber, CK, Johnson, WG (2011) Fate of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in the presence and absence of glyphosate. Weed Sci 59:506511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantu, RM, Albrecht, LP, Albrecht, AJP, Silva, AFM, Danilussi, MTY, Lorenzetti, JB (2021) Herbicide alternative for Conyza sumatrensis control in pre-planting in no-till soybeans. Adv Weed Sci 39:e2021000025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, EB, Cavalcanti, PP, Nogueira, DA (2021) ExpDes.pt: pacote experimental designs (Portugues). R package version 1.2.2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ExpDes.pt/index.html. Accessed: April 10, 2023Google Scholar
Figueiredo, MRA, Küpper, A, Malone, JM, Petrovic, T, Figueiredo, ABTB, Campagnola, G, Peersen, OB, Prasad, KVSK, Patterson, EL, Reddy, ASN, Kubeš, MF, Napier, R, Preston, C, Gaines, TA (2022) An in-frame deletion mutation in the degron tail of auxin coreceptor IAA2 confers resistance to the herbicide 2,4-D in Sisymbrium orientale . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119:e2105819119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, NT, Young, JM, Young, BG (2018a) Environmental factors moderate glyphosate-induced antagonism of post herbicides on the rapid response biotype of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci 66:301309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, NT, Young, JM, Young, BG (2018b) Glyphosate-induced antagonism in rapid response giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Technol 32:5259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2022) International Database of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/. Accessed: September 12, 2022Google Scholar
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2010) Control of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol 24:425429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, JFL, Souza, AS, Borella, J, Araujo, ALS, Langaro, AC, Alves, MM, Ferreira, LJS, Morran, S, Zobiole, LHS, Lucio, FR, Machado, AFL, Gaines, TA, Pinho, CF (2022) Rapid photosynthetic and physiological response of 2,4-D-resistant Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) to 2,4-D as a survival strategy. Weed Sci 70:298308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, GB, Treadway, JA, Reeves, JL, Steckel, LE (2017) Effect of Time of Day of Application of 2,4-D, dicamba, glufosinate, paraquat, and saflufenacil on horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control. Weed Technol 31:550556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, ML, Van Horn, CR, Robertson, R, Segobye, K, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Johnson, WG, Douglas Sammons, R, Wang, D, Ge, X, d’Avignon, A, Gaines, TA, Westra, P, Green, AC, Jeffery, T, Lespérance, MA, Tardif, FJ, Sikkema, PH, Hall, JC, McLean, MD, Lawton, MB, Schulz, B (2017) Glyphosate resistance in Ambrosia trifida: Part 2. Rapid response physiology and non-target-site resistance. Pest Manag Sci 74:10791088 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nandula, VK, Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Koger, CH, Reddy, KN (2006) Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 54:898902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira Neto AM de, Guerra, N, Dan, HDA, Braz, GBP, Jumes TM de C, Santos, G, Constantin, J, Oliveira Júnior RS de (2010) Manejo de Conyza bonariensis com glyphosate + 2,4-D e amônio-glufosinate em função do estádio de desenvolvimento. Rev Bras Herbic 9:7390 Google Scholar
Peterson, MA, McMaster, SA, Riechers, DE, Skelton, J, Stahlman, PW (2016) 2,4-D past, present, and future: a review. Weed Technol 30:303345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho, CF, Leal, JFL, Souza, AS, Oliveira, GFPB, Oliveira, C, Langaro, AC, Machado, AFL, Christoffoleti, PJ, Zobiole, LHS (2019) First evidence of multiple resistance of Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. Walker) to five mode-of-action herbicides. Aust J Crop Sci 13:16881697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, ARS, Delatorre, CA, Lucio, FR, Rossi, CVS, Zobiole, LHS, Merotto, A Jr (2020) Rapid necrosis: a novel plant resistance mechanism to 2,4-D. Weed Sci 68:618 Google Scholar
Queiroz, ARS, Delatorre, CA, Markus, C, Lucio, FR, Angonese, PS, Merotto, A Jr (2022) Rapid necrosis II: physiological and molecular analysis of 2,4-D resistance in Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis). Weed Sci 70:3645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed: April 10, 2023Google Scholar
Richardson, RG (1977) A review of foliar absorption and translocation of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Weed Res 17:259272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritz, C, Baty, F, Streibig, JC, Gerhard, D (2015) Dose–response analysis using R. PLoS ONE 10:e0146021 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, G, Oliveira, RS, Constantin, J, Francischini, AC, Osipe, JB (2014) Multiple resistance of Conyza sumatrensis to chlorimuron-ethyl and glyphosate. Planta Daninha 32:409416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, DRO, Aguiar, ACM, Basso, CJ, Muraro, DS (2021) Application time affects synthetic auxins herbicides in tank-mixture with paraquat on hairy fleabane control. Rev Ceres 68:194200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thordal-Christensen, H, Zhang, Z, Wei, Y, Collinge, DB (1997) Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants: H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley–powdery mildew interaction. Plant J 11:11871194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremmel, CD, Peterson, KM (1983) Competitive subordination of a piedmont old field successional dominant by an introduced species. Am J Bot 70:11251132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, RA, Kalsing, A, Goulart, ICGR, Lamego, FP, Christoffoleti, PJ (2007) Impacto da temperatura, irradiância e profundidade das sementes na emergência e germinação de Conyza bonariensis e Conyza canadensis resistentes ao glyphosate. Planta Daninha 25:309315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, S, Boucher, L, Cook, T, Davidson, B, McLean, A, Widderick, M (2012) Weed age affects chemical control of Conyza bonariensis in fallows. Crop Protect 38:1520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinzolker, A, Kigel, J, Rubin, B (1985) Effects of environmental factors on the germination and flowering of Conyza albida, C. bonariensis and C. canadensis . Phytoparasitica 13:229230 Google Scholar