Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:31:10.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Interaction of Insecticides with Herbicide Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chae Soon Kwon  and
Donald Penner
Chae Soon Kwon
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The combination of certain herbicides with insecticides can inhibit crop growth. Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate interaction effects of herbicides and insecticides with/without protectant, on corn and weed species. ‘Northrup King 9283’ hybrid corn showed greater sensitivity to acetanilide herbicides than ‘Cargill 7567.’ Neither the insecticides terbufos nor isazofos appeared to enhance this sensitivity. Both hybrids were sensitive to the combination of chlorimuron, nicosulfuron, or primisulfuron with terbufos. Cargill 7567 was more tolerant than Northrup King 9283 to the growth inhibiting interaction of sulfonylurea herbicides with terbufos. Imazaquin at 70 g/ha reduced height of Northrup King 9283 corn, but there was no interaction with terbufos. The protectants CGA-154281 and NA reduced corn injury from metolachlor and the combination of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron with terbufos, respectively. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron treatments combined with metolachlor showed less corn injury than metolachlor alone, but these herbicides increased corn injury when combined with terbufos. The inclusion of terbufos did not enhance primisulfuron activity on barnyardgrass, giant foxtail, or velvetleaf.

Keywords

CGA-154281, 4-(dichloro-acetyl)-3,4-dihydro-3-methyl-2H-1,4-benzoxazineNA, 1,8-naphthalic anhydridebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.). Beauv., # ECHCGcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album # CHEALgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm., # SETFAvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus, # ABUTHcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Northrup King 9283,’ ‘Cargill 7567.’Antidoteherbicide activityinteractionsafener
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. F. 1968. Trifluralin-systemic insecticide interactions on seedling cotton. Weed Sci. 16:480–482.Google Scholar
2. Baerg, R. J., Barrett, M., and Polge, N. D. 1994. Insecticide modifications of cytochrome P450 mediated herbicide metabolism. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 61.Google Scholar
3. Biediger, D. L., Baumann, P. A., Weaver, D. N., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1992. Interactions between primisulfuron and selected soil-applied insecticides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:807–812.Google Scholar
4. Corbin, F. T., Moreland, D. E., and Siminszky, B. 1993. Metabolism of primisulfuron in terbufos and/or naphthalic anhydride-treated corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:70.Google Scholar
5. Fonne-Pfister, R., Goudin, J., Kreuz, K., Ramsteiner, K., and Ebert, E. 1990. Hydroxylation of primisulfuron by an inducible cytochrome P450-dependent monoxygenase system from maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Holshouser, D. M. Chandler and H. R. Smith 1991. The influence of terbufos on the response of five corn (Zea mays) hybrids to CGA-136872. Weed Technol. 5:165–168.Google Scholar
7. Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1992. Interaction of terbufos and nicosulfuron on corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:999–1003.Google Scholar
8. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (Zea mays) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130–136.Google Scholar
9. Nash, R. G. 1968. Synergistic phytotoxicities of herbicide-insecticide combinations in soil. Weed Sci. 16:74–77.Google Scholar
10. Porpiglia, P. J., Rawls, E. K., Gillespie, G. R., and Peek, J. W. 1990. A method to evaluate the differential response of corn (Zea mays) to sulfonylureas. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 30:86.Google Scholar
11. Rehab, I. F., Burton, J. D., Manes, E. P., Marks, D. W., and Robinson, D. A. 1993. Effect of safeners on nicosulfuron and primisulfuron metabolism in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:70.Google Scholar
12. Rowe, L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1991. Efficacy and mode of action of CGA-154281, a protectant for corn (Zea mays) from metolachlor injury. Weed Sci. 39:78–82.Google Scholar
13. Rowe, L., Rossman, E., and Penner, D. 1990. Differential response of corn hybrids and inbreds to metolachlor. Weed Sci. 38:563–566.Google Scholar
14. Simpson, D. M., Diehl, K. E., and Stoller, E. W. 1993. Mechanism for 2,4-D safening of nicosulfuron/terbufos interaction in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:112.Google Scholar