Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T07:10:39.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Tillage Systems on Weed Abundance in Southwestern Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. Gordon Thomas  and
Brenda L. Frick
A. Gordon Thomas
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada, Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3A2
Brenda L. Frick
Affiliation:
Southwestern Ontario Agricultural Res. Corp., Harrow, ON, Canada N0R 1G0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed data were collected over three tillage systems and two years in southwestern Ontario, in fields of corn, soybean, and winter wheat. Tillage systems involved soil inversion by moldboard plow, soil disturbance without inversion, and no tillage. The data were subjected to multivariate ordination techniques to determine if weed communities were associated with the different crops, tillage systems, or years. Crop, year, and tillage system all had significant effects on the weed community. Weed communities in corn and winter wheat were least similar; those in soybean were intermediate. Several grass weeds were more abundant in the drier of the two years. Some variation was related to tillage system but the effect of tillage was less than that of either crop or year.

Keywords

Corn, Zea mays L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Reduced tillageordinationweed communityABUTHAMBELAGRREAMARECHEALCONARPOLLAPOLPESETVITAROF
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 699 - 705
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, D. M., McKay, G. A., and Chapman, L. J. 1968. The climate of southern Ontario. Climatological Studies No. 5, Dep. Transport, Queen's Printer, Ottawa, ON. 50 p.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. and Oplinger, E. S. 1990. Influence of tillage systems on annual weed densities and control in solid-seeded soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:158–165.Google Scholar
3. Conn, J. S. and Delapp, J. A. 1983. Weed species shifts with increasing field age in Alaska. Weed Sci. 31:520–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dale, M.R.T. and Thomas, A. G. 1987. The structure of weed communities in Saskatchewan fields. Weed Sci. 35:348–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dale, M.R.T., Thomas, A. G., and John, E. A. 1992. Environmental factors and management practices as correlates of weed communities in spring seeded crops. Can. J. Bot. 70:1931–1939.Google Scholar
6. Derksen, D. A. 1991. The influence of agronomic practices on weed communities in East-Central Saskatchewan. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON. 224 p.Google Scholar
7. Ervio, L-R. and Salonen, J. 1987. Changes in the weed population of spring cereals in Finland. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 26:201–226.Google Scholar
8. Frick, B. and Thomas, A. G. 1992. Weed surveys in different tillage systems in southwestern Ontario field crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:1337–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Frick, B., Thomas, A. G., and Wise, R. F. 1990. Weeds of corn, soybean, and winter wheat fields under conventional, conservation, and no-till management systems in southwestern Ontario 1988 and 1989. Weed Survey Series Publication 90-1. Agriculture Canada, Regina, SK. 239 p.Google Scholar
10. Froud-Williams, R. J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems, p. 213–236 in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
11. Froud-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D.S.H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:187–197.Google Scholar
12. Gauch, H. G. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 298 p.Google Scholar
13. Hill, M. O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Appl. Stat. 23:340–354.Google Scholar
14. Hoffman, D. W., Matthews, B. C., and Wicklund, R. E. 1964. Soil Associations of Southern Ontario. Report No. 30 of Ontario Soil Survey. Canada Dep. Agric., Ottawa and Ontario Agric. College, Guelph. 21 p.Google Scholar
15. Jongman, R. H., ter Braak, C.J.F., and van Tongeren, O.F.R. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 299 p.Google Scholar
16. Kells, J. J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1985. Conservation tillage and weed control, p. 123–129 in D'Hri, F. M., ed. A Systems Approach to Conservation Tillage. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea, MI.Google Scholar
17. McIntyre, S., Finlayson, C. M., Ladiges, P. Y., and Mitchell, D. S. 1991. Weed community composition and rice husbandry practices in New South Wales, Australia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 35:27–35.Google Scholar
18. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 1988. Guide to Weed Control. Publication 75, Agdex 641, Queens Printer for Ontario, Toronto, ON. 200 p.Google Scholar
19. Post, B. J. 1986. Factors of influence on the development of an arable weed vegetation. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp., Economic Weed Control, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 317–325.Google Scholar
20. Post, B. J. 1988. Multivariate analysis in weed science. Weed Res. 28:425–430.Google Scholar
21. Saavedra, M., Garcia-Torrs, L., Hernandez-Bermejo, E., and Hidalgo, B. 1990. Influence of environmental factors on the weed flora in crops in the Guadalquivir Valley. Weed Res. 30:363–374.Google Scholar
22. Sharp, D. 1976. A phytosociological study of weed communities on the southwestern coastal plain of North Carolina. Vegetatio 31:103–136.Google Scholar
23. Streibig, J. C. 1979. Numerical methods illustrating the phytosociology of crops in relation to weed flora. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:577–587.Google Scholar
24. Streibig, J. C., Combellack, J. H., and Amor, R. L. 1989. Regional differences in the weed flora of Victorian cereal crops. Bant Prot. Q. 4:111–114.Google Scholar
25. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1988. CANOCO—a FORTRAN Program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (Version 2.1). Report LWA-88-02. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 95 p.Google Scholar
26. Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci. 33:34–43.Google Scholar
27. Thomas, A. G. and Dale, M.R.T. 1991. Weed community structure in spring seeded crops in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:1069–1080.Google Scholar
28. Wentworth, T. R., Conn, J. S., Skroch, W. A., and Mrozek, E. 1984. Gradient analysis and numerical classification of apple orchard weed vegetation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 11:239–251.Google Scholar