Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:55:48.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Weed Control with 2,4-DB Amine in Seedling Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David W. Cudney ,
Steve B. Orloff  and
Carol J. Adams
David W. Cudney
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. Plant Sci., Univ. Calif., Riverside, CA 92521
Steve B. Orloff
Affiliation:
Siskiyou Co., 1655 S. Main St., Yreka, CA 96097
Carol J. Adams
Affiliation:
Dep. Stat., Univ. Calif.; Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

2,4-DB ester had been widely used for winter annual broadleaf weed control in seedling alfalfa in the western United States, but was replaced commercially by the amine formulation in 1990. Field studies conducted in the high desert region of southern California confirmed previous reports that 2,4-DB amine is not as effective as the ester formulation. Two methods were found to improve the weed control performance of 2,4-DB amine: 1) application at earlier alfalfa growth stages and 2) the addition of adjuvant. Applications made at the three-trifoliate leaf stage of the alfalfa were more than three times as effective as applications made at the eight-trifoliate leaf stage. When adjuvants were added to the amine formulation, weed control was improved 50 to 97%.

Keywords

2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidalfalfa, Medicago sativa L.2,4-DB esterPOST herbicidesurfactant. Capsella bursa-pastorisDescurainia sophiaErodium cicutariumSisymbrium irio# CAPBP# DESSO# EROCI# SSYIR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 465 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1988. Phytotoxicity and uptake of clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) as affected by adjuvants and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:20–23.Google Scholar
2. Cords, H. P. 1973. Weeds and alfalfa hay quality. Weed Sci. 21:400–401.Google Scholar
3. Elliot, J. O. and Evans, T. A. 1956. The effects of MCPB and 2,4-DB on established legumes. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 15:112–113.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, E. W. 1955. Absorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by soybean and corn plants. Agron. J. 47:32–36.Google Scholar
5. McCarty, M. K. and Sand, P. F. 1961. Chemical weed control in seedling alfalfa III. Effect of some herbicides on five varieties. Weeds 9:14–19.Google Scholar
6. Richardson, R. S. 1977. A review of foliar absorption and translocation of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Weed Res. 17:259–272.Google Scholar
7. Sand, P. F. and McCarty, M. K. 1959. Chemical control in seedling alfalfa II. Control in broad-leaved weeds. Weeds 7:317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Slife, F. W. 1956. The effect of 2,4-D and several other herbicides on weeds and soybeans when applied as post-emergence sprays. Weeds 4:61–68.Google Scholar
9. Synerholm, M. E. and Zimmerman, P. W. 1947. Preparation of a series of 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)aliphatic acids and some related compounds with a consideration of their biochemical role as plant-growth regulators. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 14:369–382.Google Scholar
10. Tonks, D., Jeffery, L. S., and Webb, B. L. 1991. Response of seedling alfalfa (Medicago sativa) to four postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 5:736–738.Google Scholar
11. Wain, R. L. 1955. Herbicidal selectivity through specific action of plants on compounds applied. J. Agric. Food Chem. 3:128–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Weaver, R. J. and DeRose, H. R. 1946. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Bot. Gaz. 107:509–521.Google Scholar