Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:59:45.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazethapyr plus Propanil Mixtures in Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

Eric P. Webster ,
Gustavo M. Teló ,
David C. Blouin  and
Benjamin M. McKnight
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Gustavo M. Teló
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Benjamin M. McKnight
Affiliation:
Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: E. P. Webster, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. (E-mail: ewebster@agcenter.lsu.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted in three locations in Louisiana to evaluate interactions of imazethapyr at 0 and 70 g ai ha−1 mixed with propanil at 0, 1,120, 2,240, 3,360, and 4,480 g ha−1 for the control of red rice, barnyardgrass, and hemp sesbania. According to Blouin’s modified Colby’s, a synergistic response occurred for red rice treated with imazethapyr mixed with propanil at 4,480 g ha−1 for all evaluations. Observed control was 93% to 95% compared with expected control of 81% to 87%. An antagonistic response occurred for barnyardgrass control with imazethapyr mixed with propanil at 1,120 g ha−1 at 35 and 49 d after treatment (DAT), with control of 75% and 64%, respectively, compared with expected control of 89% and 78%. However, a neutral response occurred for barnyardgrass control when treated with all other imazethapyr plus propanil combinations. An antagonistic interaction occurred for hemp sesbania when treated with imazethapyr plus propanil at 3,360 and 4,480 g ha−1 at 21 DAT with an observed control of 89% compared with an expected control of 96%; however, a neutral response occurred at all other evaluation dates. An increase in rice yield was observed with an imazethapyr plus propanil at 4,480 g ha−1 mixture compared with a single application of imazethapyr or propanil at any rate evaluated.

Keywords

Jason Bond, Mississippi State UniversityImazethapyrpropanilbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.hemp sesbania, Sesbania herbacea (P. Mill.) McVaughred rice/rice, Oryza sativa L.Antagonismherbicide interactionsneutral interactionsynergism
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 45 - 51
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avila, LA, Senseman, SA, McCauley, GN, Chandler, JM O’Barr, JH (2005) Effect of flood timing on red rice (Oryza spp.) control with imazethapyr applied at different dry-seeded rice growth stages. Weed Technol 19:476–480 Google Scholar
Baltazar, AM Smith, RJ Jr (1994) Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 8:575–581 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP Bond, JA (2010) On a method for synergistic and antagonistic joint-action effects with fenoxaprop mixtures in rice. Weed Technol 24:583–589 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP Zhang, W (2004) Analysis of synergistic and antagonistic effects of herbicides using non-linear mixed model methodology. Weed Technol 18:464–472 Google Scholar
Carey, VF, Hoagland, RE Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372 Google Scholar
Camargo, ER, Senseman, SA, McCauley, GN Guice, JB (2012) Rice (Oryza sativa L.) response and weed control from tank-mix applications of saflufenacil and imazethapyr. Crop Prot 31:94–98 Google Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB Blouin, DC (2011) Imazethapyr plus propanil programs in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 25:205–211 Google Scholar
Craigmiles, JP (1978) Introduction. Pages 5–6 in Eastin EF, ed. Red Rice Research and Control. Tex Agric Exp Stat Bull 1270 Google Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weed Sci 15:20–22 Google Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC Bond, JA (2015) Imazethapyr co-application interactions in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 29:689–696 Google Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC Bond, JA (2016) Imazamox plus propanil mixtures for grass weed management in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 30:29–35 Google Scholar
Khodayari, K, Smith, RJ Jr Black, HL (1987) Red rice (Oryza sativa) control with herbicide treatments in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 35:127–129 Google Scholar
Lanclos, DY, Webster, EP Zhang, W (2002) Glufosinate tank-mix combinations in glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 16:659–663 Google Scholar
Lorenzi, HJ Jeffery, LS (1987) Weeds of the United States and Their Control. New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold. 355 pGoogle Scholar
Matzenbacher, FO, Kalsing, A, Dalazen, G, Markus, C Merotto, A Jr (2015) antagonism is the predominant effect of herbicide mixtures used for imidazolinone-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control. Planta Daninha 33:587–597 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(SP1):31–62 Google Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W Blouin, DC (2004) Potential use of imazethapyr mixtures in drill-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 18:1037–1042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2008) Base SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2011) Base SAS 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 372–373 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1961) 3,4-Dichloropropionanilide for control of barnyardgrass in rice. Weeds 9:318–322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1965) Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr Hill, JE (1990) Weed control technology in U.S. rice. Pages 314–327 in Grayson BT, Green MB, Copping LG, eds. Pest Management in Rice. London: Elsevier Science Google Scholar
Stidham, MA Singh, BK (1991) Imidazolinone-acetohydroxyacid synthase interactions. Pages 72–89 in Shaner DL, O’Connor SL, eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Google Scholar
Webster, EP (2014) Weed management. Pages 54–81 in Saichuk J, ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU AgCenter Pub 2321-5/14 rev Google Scholar
Webster, EP (2017) Rice weed management. Pages 38–49 in Stephenson DO, ed. Louisiana Suggested Chemical Weed Management Guide—2017. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU AgCenter Pub 1565-01/17 rev. http://www.lsuagcenter.com/~/media/system/2/a/7/7/2a770792235b1e76eb1b7a6888fe1c8c/2017weedmanagementguide_finalpdf.pdf. Accessed: January 21, 2017Google Scholar
Webster, EP, Carlson, TP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB Blouin, DC (2012) Imazethapyr plus residual herbicide programs for imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 26:410–416 Google Scholar
Webster, EP Masson, JA (2001) Acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides on imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Sci 49:652–657 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2000) Weed survey—southern states. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 53:247–274 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC Leon, CT (2005) Fenoxaprop interactions for barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice. Weed Technol 19:293–297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP Selim, HM (2001) Effect of soil moisture on efficacy of imazethapyr in greenhouse. Weed Technol 15:355–359 Google Scholar