Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:30:27.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hophornbeam Copperleaf (Acalypha ostryifolia) Biology and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael J. Horak
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Zhuping Gao
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Dallas E. Peterson
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Larry D. Maddux
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506

Abstract

Little is known about the biology and control of hophornbeam copperleaf, a weed of increasing importance in the Midwest. More than 2 wk of cold stratification and a 0.2% KNO3 solution increased germination of hophornbeam copperleaf. Germination at constant 30 C was 47% and alternating 30/20 C was 65%. Scarification did not increase hophornbeam copperleaf germination. Within the first 600 growing degree days after soybean planting, plant height, leaf area, and dry matter accumulation of hophornbeam copperleaf grown in soybean and alone were similar. Subsequently, leaf area and dry matter accumulation of hophornbeam copperleaf grown alone were greater than of those grown in soybean. In contrast, plant height of hophornbeam copperleaf grown in soybean was greater than when grown alone. Hophornbeam copperleaf grown alone produced up to 12 510 seeds/plant, whereas hophornbeam copperleaf grown with soybean produced 980 seeds/plant. Of 13 postemergent herbicides evaluated on hophornbeam copperleaf in soybean, only lactofen, acifluorfen, and fomesafen controlled 80% or more. Lactofen at 210 g ai/ha consistently controlled more than 95% of the hophornbeam copperleaf.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adkins, S. W. and Adkins, A. L. 1994. Effect of potassium nitrate and ethephon on fate of wild oat (Avena fatua) seed in soil. Weed Sci. 42:353357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. H. and Dickens, R. 1991. Germination and emergence of Virginia buttonweed (Diodia virginiana). Weed Sci. 39:3741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, F., Santelmann, P., and Greer, H. 1974. Weed control systems for hophornbeam copperleaf control in peanuts. Agron. J. 66:789792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W. M. and Lubs, H. A. 1916. Hydrogen electrode potentials of phthalate, phosphate, and borate buffer mixtures. J. Biochem. 25:479.Google Scholar
Driver, T. L. and Oliver, L. R. 1984. Control of hophornbeam copperleaf. Arkansas Farm Res. September and October:6.Google Scholar
Li, S. 1990. Weeds and Control. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press. 189 p.Google Scholar
Michel, B. E. 1983. Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiol. 72:6670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, D. E. and Maddux, L. D. 1992. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 49:238.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. E. and Regehr, D. L. 1995. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 52:357.Google Scholar
Russelle, M. P., Wilhelm, W., Olson, R. A., and Power, J. F. 1984. Growth analysis based on degree days. Crop Sci. 24:2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, H. S., Bassi, P. K., Goudey, J. S., and Spencer, M. S. 1987. Breakage of seed dormancy of field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense) by growth regulators, nitrate, and environmental factors. Weed Sci. 35:802806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S. J., Jones, R. A., and Williams, W. A. 1984. Review of data analysis methods for seed germination. Crop Sci. 24:11921199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar