Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:12:10.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicides for monochoria (Monochoria vaginalis) control in transplanted rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2023

Zahra Hazrati Open the ORCID record for Zahra Hazrati [Opens in a new window] ,
Bijan Yaghoubi Open the ORCID record for Bijan Yaghoubi [Opens in a new window] ,
Pershang Hosseini Open the ORCID record for Pershang Hosseini [Opens in a new window]  and
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan Open the ORCID record for Bhagirath Singh Chauhan [Opens in a new window]
Zahra Hazrati
Affiliation:
Former M.Sc. Student, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
Bijan Yaghoubi*
Affiliation:
Professor, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Rasht, Iran
Pershang Hosseini
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Affiliation:
Professor, Weed Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Gatton, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Bijan Yaghoubi; Email: b.yaghoubi@areeo.ac.ir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Iran, monochoria is a noxious weed in fields of transplanted rice. Two field experiments were conducted to assess the efficacy of soil-applied and foliar-applied herbicides to control monochoria in transplanted rice. Prepackaged herbicides (triafamone plus ethoxysulfuron applied at 40 g ai ha−1, pyrazosulfuron-ethyl plus pretilachlor applied at 382.5 g ai ha−1, and pendimethalin plus clomazone applied at 1,200 g ai ha−1) reduced monochoria biomass by 100%, 100%, and 14%, respectively; and a single application of flucetosulfuron at 30 g ai ha−1, pendimethalin at 990 g ai ha−1, thiobencarb at 2,750 g ai ha−1, and pretilachlor at 1,000 g ai ha−1 reduced monochoria biomass by 100%, 99%, 75%, and 56%, respectively, compared with a nontreated control. Tank-mixed bensulfuron-methyl at 45 g ai ha−1 applied with pretilachlor, thiobencarb, or pendimethalin provided 100% control of monochoria. Rice height, and straw and grain yield were greater after herbicide treatments than those of the nontreated and hand-weeded controls, indicating the advantages of chemical control of monochoria over manual weeding. Full-season monochoria interference reduced rice grain yield by 32%. In the second study, the herbicides triafamone plus ethoxysulfuron, flucetosulfuron, 2,4-D at 1,080 g ai ha−1, dicamba plus 2,4-D at 928 g ai ha−1, bispyribac-sodium at 31.25 g ai ha−1, bentazon plus MCPA at 1,150 g ai ha−1, pyribenzoxim at 30 g ai ha−1, and propanil at 5,400 g ai ha−1 applied to foliage at 4- to 5-leaf seedlings of monochoria provided ≥97% control and prevented 100% of its regrowth, with the exception of propanil. This study shows that monochoria control can be achieved by using a variety of residual and foliar-applied herbicides with different mechanisms of action.

Keywords

2,4-Dbensulfuron-methylbentazon plus MCPAbispyribac-sodiumclomazonedicamba plus 2,4-Dflucetosulfuronpyribenzoximpendimethalinpretilachlorpyrazosulfuronpropanilthiobencarbtriafamone plus ethoxysulfuronmonochoriaMonochoria vaginalis (Burm. f.) C. PreslriceOryza sativa L.Invasiveaquatic weedsoil-appliedfoliar-applied
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , December 2023 , pp. 598 - 605
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Jason Bond, Mississippi State University

References

Ampong-Nyarko, K, De-Datta, SK (1991) A Handbook for Weed Control in Rice. 1st ed. Manila: International Rice Research Institute. 220 pGoogle Scholar
Athira, G, Menon, MV, Sindhu, P, Prameela, P (2020) Seed germination and emergence ecology of Monochoria vaginalis (Burm. f.) Kunth. J Trop Agric 57:186–190 Google Scholar
Bernasor, P, De-Datta, S (1986) Chemical and cultural control of bulrush (Scirpus maritimus L.) and annual weeds in lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Res 26:233–244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caton, BP, Mortimer, M, Hill, J (2010) Pages 40–41 in A practical field guide to weeds of rice in Asia. 1st ed. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS (2012) Pages 2–3 in Weed management in direct-seeded rice systems. 1st ed. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute Google Scholar
Cheng, W, Okamoto, Y, Takei, M, Tawaraya, K, Yasuda, H (2015) Combined use of Azolla and loach suppressed weed Monochoria vaginalis and increased rice yield without agrochemicals. Org Agric 5:1–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W, Sakai, H, Nishimura, S, Yagi, K, Hasegawa, T (2010) The lowland paddy weed Monochoria vaginalis emits N2O but not CH4 . Agr Ecosyst Environ 137:219–221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhury, PP, Singh, R, Ghosh, D, Sharma, AR (2016) Herbicide use in Indian agriculture. 1st ed. Jabalpur, India: ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research. 110 pGoogle Scholar
Driver, KE, Al-Khatib, K, Godar, A (2020) Survey of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fusca spp.) response to clomazone in California rice. Weed Technol 34:661–665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020) Statistical databases. http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed: July 24, 2022Google Scholar
Golmohammadi, M, Mohammaddoust-Chamanabad, H, Yaghoubi, B, Oveisi, M (2018) Rice weed community composition and richness in northern Iran: A temperate rainy area. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16:4605–4617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazrati, Z, Yaghoubi, B, Asghari, J (2019) Herbicides screening for chemical control of Monochoria, the invasive weed (Monochoria vaginalis) in paddy rice. Iran J Weed Sci 15:17–28 Google Scholar
Herath, H, Abeysekara, A, Senevirathne, R (2007) Effect of pretilachlor plus pyribenzoxim 320 EC on weed control in wet-seeded rice in Sri Lanka. Pages 149–152 in Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Colombo, Sri Lanka, October 2–6, 2007Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1977) The world’s worst weeds: Distribution and biology. 1st ed. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 610 pGoogle Scholar
Hou, F (1983) Effects of plant growth regulators on weed community compositions, sprouting, development and grain yield of main and ratoon rice. M.Sc thesis. Los Baños Philippines: University of the Philippines. 173 pGoogle Scholar
Im, IB, Kang, JG, Kim, S (2004) Control strategy of sulfonylurea resistant Monochoria vaginalis according to the growth stage in rice paddy fields. Kor J Weed Sci 24:87–92 Google Scholar
[IRRI] International Rice Research Institute (1983) Proceedings of the Conference on Weed Control in Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 422 pGoogle Scholar
Janiya, JD, Moody, K (1989) Weed populations in transplanted and wet-seeded rice as affected by weed control method. Trop Pest Manage 35:8–11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, DL, Kendig, JA (1998). Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with post-emergence application of propanil and clomazone in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 12:537–541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebede, D (2000) Weed control methods used in Ethiopia. Pages 250–251 in Starkey, P, Simalenga, T, eds. Animal power for weed control. Wageningen, Netherlands: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation Google Scholar
Kendig, A, Williams, B, Smith, CW (2003) Rice Weed Control. Pages 457–472 in Smith, CW and Dilday, RH. Rice Origin, History, Technology, and Production. Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley and Sons Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M, Honda, H, Yamaji, Y, Hanai, R, Yasuda, A (2007) Biological performance of bispyribac sodium plus thiobencarb 915 OD in rice. Pages 246–251 in Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Colombo, Sri Lanka, October 2–6, 2007Google Scholar
Kuk, YI, Jung, HI, Kwon, OD, Lee, DJ, Burgos, NR, Guh, JO (2003) Sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant Monochoria vaginalis in Korean rice culture. Pest Manag Sci 59:949–961 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, V, Ladha, JK (2011) Direct seeding of rice: recent developments and future research needs. Adv Agron 111:297–413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamid, Z (1981) Biology and response of Monochoria vaginalis (Burm. f.) Presl. to selected herbicides at different growth stages. M.Sc thesis. Los Baños, Philippines: University of the Philippines. 74 pGoogle Scholar
Li, SS, Wei, SH, Zuo, RL, Wei, JG, Qiang, S (2012) Changes in the weed seed bank over 9 consecutive years of rice–duck farming. Crop Prot 37:42–50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, MV, Bridgit, T, Girija, T (2016) Efficacy of herbicide combinations for weed management in transplanted rice. J Trop Agric 54:204–208 Google Scholar
Moon, BC, Kwon, OD, Cho, SH, Lee, SG, Won, JG, Lee, IY, Park, JE, Kim, DS (2012) Modeling the competition effect of Sagittaria trifolia and Monochoria vaginalis weed density on rice in transplanted rice cultivation. Kor J Weed Sci 32:188–194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munir, AT, Abdel Rahman, MT (2012) Awnless barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) response to hand weeding and 2,4-D application at two growth stages under Mediterranean environment. Weed Biol Manag 2:163–168 Google Scholar
Naylor, R (1996) Herbicides in Asian rice: transitions in weed management. 1st ed. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 270 pGoogle Scholar
Obuchi, K (1991) Herbicide use in paddy rice in Japan. Tokyo: Nissan Chemical Industries. 48 pGoogle Scholar
Osterholt, MJ, Webster, EP, Mcknight, BM, Blouin, DC (2021) Interactions of clomazone plus pendimethalin mixed with propanil in rice. Weed Technol 35:675–680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, JY, Park, JE, Lee, IY, Kwon, OS, Park, JK (2011) Life cycle and host specificity of Tanysphyrus (Tanysphyroides) major Roelofs (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a possible candidate agent for the biological control of Monochoria vaginalis var. plantaginea . Kor J Weed Sci 31:103–111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C (1992) Pages 1–5 in Weeds of Bhutan. 1st ed. Thimphu, Bhutan: National Plant Protection Centre CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B, Scott, R, Carey, V (2008) Urea ammonium nitrate effects on bispyribac and penoxsulam efficacy. Weed Technol 22:597–601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourreza, Z, Yaghoubi, B, Pouramir, F (2020) Comparison the efficacy of bispyribac sodium (Vejin, 12.5%) herbicide in soil and foliar applied method for paddy fields weed control. In 16th national iranian crop science congress. Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University, Ahvaz, Iran, January 25–27, 2020Google Scholar
Radosevich, SR, Holt, JS, Ghersa, CM (2007) Ecology of weeds and invasive plant relationship to agriculture and natural resource management. 3rd Ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Google Scholar
Sharifi, MM (1990) First report of Monochoria vaginalis in Iran. Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute Newsletter 15:4–30 Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Y, Kawaguchi, S, Yoneyama, K (2001) Inhibitory and promotive allelopathy in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Biol Manag 1:147–156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, AP, Gong, FT, Zhu, WD, Wang, J, Lian, L (2011) Effects of 17% wettable powder mixed with bensulfuron methyl and pendimethalin for control of weeds in transplanted rice fields. Hubei, China: Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences Google Scholar
Ueji, M, Inao, K (2001) Rice paddy field herbicides and their effects on the environment and ecosystems. Weed Biol Manag 1:71–79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanangamudi, K, Bhaskaran, S, Balavidhya, M, Murali, AP (2013) Weed Seed Biology. New Delhi: Scientific Publishers Google Scholar
Vidotto, F, Tesio, F, Tabacchi, M, Ferrero, A (2007) Herbicide sensitivity of Echinochloa species accessions in Italian rice fields. Crop Prot 26:285–293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, BJ (1999) Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in dry-seeded rice with V-10029. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 52:50.Google Scholar
Yaghoubi, B (2017) Final report on study the efficacy of bispyribac sodium SC 10% (Nominee) in paddy field weed control. Rasht, Iran: Rice Research Institute of Iran, Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization Google Scholar
Yaghoubi, B, Aminpanah, H, Chauhan, BS (2022). Performance of different herbicides on pondweed (Potamogeton nodosus) in rice. Weed Technol 36:270–275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaghoubi, B, Aminpanah, H, Sharifi, P (2021) Efficacy of some new herbicides for barnyardgrass controlling (Echinochloa crus-galli L.) P. Beauv in different rice genotypes. J Plant Prod Sci 28:169–184 Google Scholar
Yamada, S, Okubo, S, Kitagawa, Y, Takeuchi, K (2007). Restoration of weed communities in abandoned rice paddy fields in the Tama Hills, central Japan. Agr Ecosyst Environ 119:88–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu-xiang, M (2009) Controlling effect and safety of flucetosulfuron against weeds in direct-sowing rice field. J Anhui Agric 37:18030–18032 Google Scholar
Zhou, W, Luo, J, Li, B, Tang, L, Zheng, X, Li, Y (2021) Effects of Monochoria vaginalis density on yield losses, economic thresholds, and gross returns in paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Sci 61:3610–3622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar