Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T13:58:03.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Soil-Applied Herbicides in Sequential Programs with CGA-277476 in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric W. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
J. C. Holloway Jr.
Affiliation:
Novartis Crop Protection Corp., Delta Research Station, Greenville, MS 38701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dshaw@weedscience.msstate.edu.

Abstract

Soil-applied herbicides alone or followed by postemergence (POST) applications of CGA-277476 were evaluated for season-long weed control in soybean. Common cocklebur, hemp sesbania, and pitted morningglory control was not consistently improved with a soil-applied herbicide followed by a POST application of 79 g ai/ha CGA-277476. However, in locations with heavy weed pressure, a tank-mix of chlorimuron + metribuzin + trifluralin or imazaquin + pendimethalin followed by CGA-277476 improved common cocklebur, hemp sesbania, and pitted morningglory over CGA-277476 alone. Sequential application of CGA-277476 following SAN 582 improved weed control over SAN 582 alone. When weed pressure was not severe, there were no differences in control from CGA-277476 alone or following soil-applied herbicides. A POST application of CGA-277476 following soil-applied herbicides did not consistently improve soybean yield over CGA-277476 alone. Yield from soybean treated with SAN 582 was improved when CGA-277476 was applied. In contrast, when chlorimuron + metribuzin + trifluralin or imazaquin + pendimethalin were applied at planting, yield was similar with or without POST application of CGA-277476.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Approved for publication as Journal Article J-9440 of the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.

References

Literature Cited

Adcock, T. E. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Effects of preemergence herbicides on the competitiveness of selected weeds. Weed Sci. 39:5456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Expert Herbicide. Greensboro, NC: Novartis Crop Protection Corp. Tech. Bull. CGA-220-00005-A.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. Weed Control Guidelines for Mississippi. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University, Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service Pub. 1532.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F. L. 1995. Weed control in Roundup tolerant soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:46.Google Scholar
Boza, R. C. and Oliver, L. R. 1993. Shoot and root interference of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 41:3437.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and DeFelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:232237.Google Scholar
Cordes, R. C. and Bauman, T. T. 1984. Field competition between ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:364370.Google Scholar
Crowley, R. H., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1979. Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to preemergence applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:531535.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365374.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1997. Weed survey—southern states. Grass crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:227272.Google Scholar
Green, J. M., Obrigawitch, T. T., Long, J. D., and Hutchison, J. M. 1988. Metribuzin and chlorimuron mixtures for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:355363.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. C. Jr. and Shaw, D. R. 1995. Influence of soil-applied herbicides on ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) growth and development in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:655659.Google Scholar
Mosier, D. G. and Oliver, L. R. 1995. Soybean (Glycine max) interference on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula). Weed Sci. 43:402409.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183188.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. B., Jordan, D. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Griffin, J. L. 1995. Broadleaf weed control with trifluralin plus flumetsulam in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9:446451.Google Scholar
Swantek, J. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1997. Soil-applied treatment combinations with sulfentrazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:28.Google Scholar
Vail, G. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1993. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7:220225.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with lactofen plus chlorimuron. Weed Technol. 7:311316.Google Scholar
Wesley, R. A. Jr., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Application timing of metribuzin, chlorimuron, and imazaquin for common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Weed Technol. 3:364368.Google Scholar
Williams, C. S. and Hayes, R. M. 1984. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:498501.Google Scholar