Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:01:46.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Red Morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) for Potential Atrazine Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Blaine J. Viator ,
James L. Griffin  and
Edward P. Richard Jr.
Blaine J. Viator
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Edward P. Richard Jr.
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, ARS-SRRC, Sugarcane Research Unit, P.O. Box 470, Houma, LA 70361
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jgriffin@agctr.lsu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory and greenhouse studies were conducted to determine if the reported red morningglory control failures with atrazine in sugarcane are caused by triazine-resistant mutants. Plants were grown from seeds collected at 24 locations in Louisiana and Arkansas where atrazine had never been used, and where it had been used in sugarcane with poor results. Terminal fluorescence of leaf material from all locations increased after treatment with 10−3 M atrazine, indicating electron transport inhibition and, hence, triazine susceptibility. However, small differences in the magnitude of fluorescence increase were observed among populations, possibly indicating the existence of biotypes with slightly different inherent tolerances to atrazine. Some phenotypic differences were observed among the red morningglory populations. In a separate study, postemergence application of atrazine at 1.1 kg ai/ha plus nonionic surfactant controlled greenhouse-grown plants from all populations at least 99%, which supports the findings of the fluorescence assay. This research was unable to verify that reduced red morningglory control with atrazine was the result of an altered binding site mutation, even in populations exposed to atrazine annually for more than 10 yr. Other factors should be evaluated to determine their impact on atrazine performance.

Keywords

Atrazinered morningglory, Ipomoea coccinea L. #3 IPOCCsugarcane, Saccharum interspecific hybridsChlorophyll fluorescenceherbicide resistanceIPOCCphotosynthesis inhibitionphotosystem IItriazine resistanceweed biotypesCRF, change in relative fluorescenceDAT, days after treatmentFT, terminal fluorescencePOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 96 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., Arntzen, C. J., and Stoller, E. W. 1981. Chlorophyll fluorescence assay for the determination of triazine resistance. Weed Sci. 29: 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, A. and Machado, V. S. 1984. A comparative analysis of leaf chlorophyll fluorescence, Hill reaction activity, and 14C-atrazine tracer studies to explain differential atrazine susceptibility in wild turnip rape (Brassica campestris) biotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64: 707–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. D., Roeth, F. W., and Martin, A. R. 1996. Occurrence and control of triazine-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 10: 570–575.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1999. Louisiana Summary of Agricultural and Natural Resources. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service. Pub. 2382. 320 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2000. Louisiana Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service. Pub. 1565. 120 p.Google Scholar
Bahler, C. C., Moser, L. E., and Vogel, K. P. 1987. Using leaf fluorescence for evaluating atrazine tolerance of three perennial warm-season grasses. J. Range Manag. 40: 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengston, R. L., Selim, H. M., and Ricaud, R. 1998. Water quality from sugarcane production on alluvial soils. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 41: 1,331–1,336.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A. and Hiltbold, A. E. 1973. Performance and persistence of atrazine. Weed Sci. 21: 413–416.Google Scholar
Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C., eds. 1993. Herbicidal inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. In Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewoods Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall. pp. 113–136.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Liu, L., Tranel, P. J., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1998. A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci. 46: 514–520.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Liu, L., Vigue, G., Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Tranel, P. J. 1999. A kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotype resistant to triazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 47: 20–27.Google Scholar
Goltsev, V., Yordanov, I., and Tsonev, T. 1994. Evaluation of relative contribution of initial and variable chlorophyll fluorescence measured at different temperatures. Photosynthetica 30: 629–643.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L., Viator, B. J., and Ellis, J. M. 2000. Tie-vine (morningglory) control at layby. Sugar Bull. 78: 23–35.Google Scholar
Havaux, M. 1989. Comparison of atrazine-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Senecio vulgaris L.: effects of high and low temperatures on the in vivo photosynthetic electron transfer in intact leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 40: 849–854.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 1997. The occurrence of herbicide-resistant weeds worldwide. Pestic. Sci. 51: 235–243.Google Scholar
Kelley, S. T., Coats, G. E., and Luthe, D. S. 1999. Mode of resistance of triazine-resistant annual bluegrass (Poa annua). Weed Technol. 13: 747–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingaman, T. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1996. Existence of ecotypes among populations of entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula). Weed Sci. 44: 540–544.Google Scholar
Kube, J. G., Vogel, K. P., and Moser, L. E. 1989. Genetic variability for seedling atrazine tolerance in indiangrass. Crop Sci. 29: 18–23.Google Scholar
Lehoczki, E., Laskay, G., Polos, E., and Mikulas, J. 1984. Resistance to triazine herbicides in horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci. 32: 669–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Martinez, N., Marshall, G., and De Prado, R. 1997. Resistance of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to atrazine and quinclorac. Pestic. Sci. 52: 171–175.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, C. D. and Daniel, D. J. 1973. A rapid screening technique for photosynthetic mutants of higher plants. Plant Sci. Lett. 1: 237–240.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1988. Control of morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) in sugarcane with layby herbicide treatments. J. Am. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 8: 62–66.Google Scholar
Ostrofsky, E. B., Traina, S. J., and Tuovinen, O. H. 1997. Variation in atrazine mineralization rates in relation to agricultural management practices. J. Environ. Qual. 26: 647–657.Google Scholar
Parks, R. J., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., Hartwig, N. L., and Calvin, D. D. 1996. Herbicide susceptibility and biological fitness of triazine-resistant and susceptible common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci. 44: 517–522.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr., Goss, J. R., Arntzen, C. J., and Slife, F. W. 1983. Determination of herbicide inhibition of photosynthesis electron transport by fluorescence. Weed Sci. 31: 361–367.Google Scholar
Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18: 614–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeda, R. J., Hasegawa, P. M., Goldsbrough, P. B., Singh, N. K., and Weller, S. C. 1993. A serine-to-threonine substitution in the triazine herbicidebinding protein in potato cells results in atrazine resistance without impairing productivity. Plant Physiol. 103: 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solymosi, P., Lehoczki, E., and Laskay, G. 1986. Difference in herbicide resistance to various taxonomic populations of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and late-flowering goosefoot (Chenopodium strictum) in Hungary. Weed Sci. 34: 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwick, L. M., Willis, G. H., Johnson, D. C., and Selim, H. M. 1995. Leaching of nitrate, atrazine, and metribuzin from sugarcane in southern Louisiana. J. Environ. Qual. 24: 684–690.Google Scholar
Splittstoesser, W. E. and Derscheid, L. A. 1962. Effects of environment upon herbicides applied preemergence. Weeds 10: 304–308.Google Scholar
Sundby, C., Chow, W. S., and Anderson, J. M. 1993. Effects of photosystem II, photoinhibition, and plant performance of the spontaneous mutation of serine-264 in the photosystem II reaction center D1 protein in triazine-resistant Brassica napus L. Plant Physiol. 103: 105–113.Google Scholar
Thakar, C. and Singh, H. N. 1954. Nilkalamine (Ipomoea hederacea), a menace to sugarcane. Hort. Abstr. 24:530.Google Scholar
Yassir, A., Lagacherie, B., Houot, S., and Soulas, G. 1999. Microbial aspects of atrazine biodegradation in relation to history of soil treatment. Pestic. Sci. 55: 799–809.Google Scholar