Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Efficacy and Economics of Summer Fallow Conventional and Reduced-Tillage Programs for Sugarcane

  • Luke M. Etheredge (a1), James L. Griffin (a1) and Michael E. Salassi (a2)

Abstract

During the summer fallow period of the sugarcane production cycle, glyphosate in conjunction with frequent tillage is used to destroy sugarcane regrowth and reduce perennial weed infestations. For tillage to be reduced or eliminated in fallowed fields, weed control must be maintained and sugarcane must be completely destroyed so as not to interfere with the subsequent planting operation. Field studies were conducted to evaluate glyphosate rates and formulations for control of sugarcane, bermudagrass, and johnsongrass. Glyphosate (isopropylamine salt) applied in April at 1.68, 2.24, and 2.80 kg ai/ha controlled 15-cm sugarcane at least 95% 42 d after treatment (DAT). Control of 25- and 40-cm sugarcane was maximized at 1.68 kg/ha (91 and 86% control, respectively). In another study, 25-cm sugarcane was controlled equally with isopropyl amine and potassium salt glyphosate formulations. Bermudagrass control 40 d after glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg/ha was 86% and increased to 98% when the same rate was applied sequentially. In fallowed sugarcane fields, conventional-tillage, reduced-tillage, and no-tillage programs were implemented from mid-April through mid-August to evaluate weed control and economics. When a glyphosate application was substituted for a tillage operation, bermudagrass and johnsongrass control was increased compared with the conventional tillage alone program, but differences in sugarcane and sugar yield among the various programs the following year were not observed. Based on 2006 costs, elimination of a single tillage operation reduced cost $18.49/ha and addition of glyphosate (2.8 kg/ha plus application cost) increased cost $43.47/ha. Total cost for the conventional tillage–alone fallow program was $110.94/ha; where herbicide was used in the reduced-tillage and no-tillage programs, total cost was $19.47 to $77.38/ha more.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: jgriffin@agcenter.lsu.edu.

References

Hide All
Anonymous 1991. Minimum tillage. Pages 32. in. Power Farming. North Melborne, Australia: Diverse Publishing Co. Pty. Ltd.
Anonymous 2001. Sugarcane Production Handbook. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Pub. 2859. 52 p.
Anonymous 2002. CTIC National Crop Residue Management Survey. http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/. Accessed February 2004.
Anonymous 2005a. Farm Bill 2002. Conservation Security Program (CSP), Program Description. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/farmbill/2002/pdf/CSP_PrDes100605.pdf. Accessed November 2006.
Anonymous 2005b. Louisiana Agricultural Summary. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Pub. SP2005-02. 1921.
Anonymous 2007. Louisiana Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Pub. 1565. 9394.
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two- and three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665672.
Chen, J. C. P. and Chou, C. 1993. Cane Sugar Handbook. 12th ed. New York: J. Wiley. 852867.
Coats, W. E. and Thacker, G. 1997. Reduced tillage systems for irrigated cotton: energy requirements and crop response. Appl. Eng. Agric 13/1:3134.
Griffin, J. L., Miller, D. K., and Salassi, M. E. 2006. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halpense) control and economics of using glyphosate resistant soybean in fallow sugarcane fields. Weed Technol 20:980985.
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Bollero, G. A., and Stoller, E. W. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:1420.
Judice, W. E., Griffin, J. L., Jones, C. A., Etheredge, L. M. Jr., and Salassi, M. E. 2006. Weed control and economics using reduced tillage programs in sugarcane. Weed Technol 20:319325.
Kennedy, C. W. and Hutchinson, R. L. 2001. Cotton growth and development under different tillage systems. Crop Sci 41:11621168.
Lal, R., Eckert, D. J., Fausey, N. R., and Edwards, W. M. 1990. Conservation tillage in sustainable agriculture. Pages 203225. In Edwards, C. A. Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
Miller, D. K., Griffin, J. L., and Richard, E. P. Jr. 1999. Summer fallow and after-planting bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control programs for sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Weed Technol 13:127131.
Pear, E., Bounza, H., Morales, M., Lopez, N., Hernandez, S., and Martinez, I. 1992. Influence of two soil technologies on the nutrient absorption, radical development and sugarcane yield. Ciencias del Suelo, Riego y Mechanizacion 2:2535.
Richard, E. P. Jr. 1995. Bermudagrass interference during a three year sugarcane crop cycle. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol 21:3139.
Richard, E. P. Jr. 1997. Effects of fallow bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control programs on newly planted sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Weed Technol 11:677682.
Salassi, M. E. and Breaux, J. 2006. Projected Costs and Returns—Sugarcane, Louisiana A.E.A. Information Series No. 237. http://www.agecon.lsu.edu/FarmManagement.htm. Accessed November 2006.
Saxton, A. M. 1998. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc. Mixed. Pages 12431246. in. Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group Ino-tillageage. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Triplett, G. B. and Van Doren, D. M. Jr. 1977. Agriculture without tillage. Sci. Am 236:2833.
Vyn, T. J., Opoku, G., and Swanton, C. J. 1998. Residue management and minimum tillage systems for soybeans following wheat. Agron. J. 90:131138.
Wagger, M. G. and Denton, H. P. 1992. Crop and tillage rotations: grain yield, residue cover and soil water. Soil Sci. Am. J. 56:12331237.
Wall, D. A. and Stobbe, E. H. 1984. The effect of tillage on soil temperature and corn (Zea mays L.) growth in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci 64:5967.

Keywords

Efficacy and Economics of Summer Fallow Conventional and Reduced-Tillage Programs for Sugarcane

  • Luke M. Etheredge (a1), James L. Griffin (a1) and Michael E. Salassi (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed