Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:29:56.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Various Adjuvants on Sethoxydim Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. Neil Harker*
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, AB, Canada T0C 1S0

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Lacombe Research Station from 1989 to 1991 to determine the influence of various adjuvants on sethoxydim activity. In all experiments sethoxydim was applied at 100 g ai ha-1 to green foxtail, wheat, wild oat, and barley seeded in a canola crop. Of the four grass species, green foxtail was the most susceptible and barley was the least susceptible to sethoxydim. CC 16255 was the most effective adjuvant followed by either of two sources of ammonium sulphate (liquid or granular) and then Merge. Liquid and granular forms of ammonium sulphate were equally effective in enhancing sethoxydim activity. Several other adjuvants, including Enhance, Savol, and XE 1167, were moderately effective in the enhancement of sethoxydim activity. Adding Canplus 411 to Merge was not usually beneficial, but additions of Canplus 411 to Enhance often increased sethoxydim activity compared with sethoxydim and Enhance alone. Agral 90 and LI-700 were of little or no value as adjuvants with sethoxydim.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1991. Guide to crop protection in Alberta. Part 1 Chemical. Agdex 606-1.Google Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C. 1989. Adjuvant and pH effects on sethoxydim and clethodim activity on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 3:615620.Google Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574583.Google Scholar
4. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or Ro-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174177.Google Scholar
5. Chow, P.N.P. 1983. Herbicide mixtures containing BAS 9052 for weed control in flax (Linum usitatissimum). Weed Sci. 31:2022.Google Scholar
6. Chow, P.N.P., O'Sullivan, P. A., Hunter, J. H., and Kirkland, K. J. 1983. Control of barley and wheat in canola with BAS 9052. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:10991102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Chow, P.N.P. and MacGregor, A. W. 1983. Effect of ammonium sulphate and surfactants on activity of the herbicide sethoxydim. J. Pestic. Sci. 8:519527.Google Scholar
8. Fawcett, J. A., Harvey, R. G., Arnold, W. E., Bauman, T. T., Eberlein, C. V., Kells, J. J., Moshier, L. J., Slife, F. W., and Wilson, R. G. 1987. Influence of environment on corn (Zea mays) tolerance to sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 35:568575.Google Scholar
9. Friesen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1990. Improving the efficiency of sethoxydim in flax. Weed Technol. 4:749753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Harker, K. N. 1987. Enhancing fluazifop-butyl activity with ammonium sulphate. Research Report of the Expert Committee on Weeds; Western Section. Dec. 1–3, 1987, Victoria, B.C. p. 300301.Google Scholar
11. Hatter, K. N. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1988. Ammonium sulphate enhances control of annual grass weeds in canola (Brassica campestris) with sethoxydim. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:10871093.Google Scholar
12. Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., and Bode, L. E. 1986. Influence of adjuvants and application variables on postemergence weed control with bentazon and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:462466.Google Scholar
13. Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Compatibility of BAS 9052 OH with acifluorfen and bentazon. Weed Sci. 31:597599.Google Scholar
14. Hosaka, H., Inaba, H., and Ishikawa, H. 1984. Response of monocotyledons to BAS 9052 OH. Weed Sci. 32:2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kells, J. J. and Wanamarta, G. 1987. Effect of adjuvant and spray volume on quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with selective postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 1:129132.Google Scholar
16. McInnes, D., Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1992. The influence of ultraviolet light on the phytotoxicity of sethoxydim tank-mixtures with various adjuvants. Pages 205 to 213 (Chapter 17) in Foy, C. L., ed., Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
17. Nalewaja, J. D. and Skrzypczak, G. A. 1986. Absorption and translocation of sethoxydim with additives. Weed Sci. 34:657663.Google Scholar
18. O'Sullivan, P. A., O'Donovan, J. T., and Hamman, W. M. 1981. Influence of nonionic surfactants, ammonium sulphate, water quality and spray volume on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:391400.Google Scholar
19. Retzinger, E. J. Jr., Rogers, R. L., and Mowers, R. P. 1983. Performance of BAS 9052 applied to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:796800.Google Scholar
20. Van Valkenburg, J. W. 1982. Terminology, classification, and chemistry. p. 19 in Hodgson, R. K., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
21. Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. Identification of efficacious adjuvants for sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Technol. 3:6066.Google Scholar
22. Wills, G. D. 1984. Toxicity and translocation of sethoxydim in bermudagrass (Cynocon dactylon) as affected by environment. Weed Sci. 32:2024.Google Scholar
23. York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., Wilcut, J. W. 1990. Effects of (NH4)2SO4 and BCH 81508 on efficacy of sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 4:7680.Google Scholar