Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:50:48.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Herbicides and Tillage on Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Control in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William S. Curran
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
Edward L. Werner
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
Nathan L. Hartwig
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802

Abstract

Postemergence applications of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron were compared to preplant glyphosate and atrazine plus simazine for quackgrass control in reduced tillage and no-till corn. The level of quackgrass control was reduced by no-till practices. At 6 wk after planting, glyphosate and atrazine plus simazine were most effective in controlling quackgrass. Quackgrass biomass 12 wk after planting indicated that the performance of the herbicides were generally similar, although primisulfuron was less effective in no-till. One year after corn planting, levels of quackgrass control in the tilled plots were the same as or better than in the no-till treatments. Atrazine plus simazine was the most effective herbicide treatment over tillage systems, while primisulfuron was the least effective.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1970. U.S. Dep. Agric. Selected Weeds of the United States. Agricultural Handbook. No. 366, Agricultural Research Service. 463 p.Google Scholar
2. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bahnson, B. M. 1990. Postemergence activity of DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 in controlling quackgrass, Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv., in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 23.Google Scholar
3. Bhowmik, P. C., O'Toole, B. M., and Andaloro, J. 1991. Effects of nicosulfuron on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Tech. 61:5256.Google Scholar
4. Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1992. Selective postemergence quackgrass [Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski] control in corn—a two year summary. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:12.Google Scholar
5. Buchholtz, K. P. 1962. Some characteristics of quackgrass and their relation to control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 16:1622.Google Scholar
6. Darwent, A. L., Baig, M. N., Lefkovitch, L. P., and Gallagher, A. W. 1989. Control of quackgrass in fallow from several glyphosate plus tillage treatments and its effect on the subsequent yield of barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:12071215.Google Scholar
7. Foy, C. L. and Witt, H. L. 1990. Johnsongrass control with DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 in corn (Zea mays) in Virginia. Weed Technol. 4:615619.Google Scholar
8. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. p. 609.Google Scholar
9. Ivany, J. A. 1988. Control of quackgrass with glyphosate and additives. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:10951101.Google Scholar
10. Ivany, J. A. 1981. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with fall-applied glyphosate and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 29:382386.Google Scholar
11. Ivany, J. A. 1978. Effects of quackgrass competition on silage corn yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:539542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Karatle, H. M., Kenyon, W. H., and Strachan, S. D. 1988. DPX-V9360—a new selective postemergence grass herbicide for corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:1213.Google Scholar
13. Majek, B. A., Erikson, C., and Duke, W. B. 1984. Tillage effects and environmental influences on quackgrass (Agropyron repens) rhizome growth. Weed Sci. 32:376381.Google Scholar
14. Nandula, V. J. and Curran, W. S. 1993. Wirestem muhly (MIMuhlenbergia frondosa) management in no-till corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:31.Google Scholar
15. Porpiglia, P. J., Collins, H. A., and Peek, J. W. 1988. CGA-136872—a new corn herbicide. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 13.Google Scholar
16. Rioux, R., Bandeen, J. D., and Anderson, G. W. 1974. Effects of growth stage on translocation of glyphosate in quackgrass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:397401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
18. Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wyse, D. L. 1986. Regrowth of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence applications of haloxyfop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:664668.Google Scholar
19. Toai, T. V. and Linscott, D. L. 1979. Phytotoxic effect of decaying quackgrass (Agropyron repens) residues. Weed Sci. 27:595598.Google Scholar
20. White, R. P. 1977. Effects of planting dates on forage corn yields and maturity on Prince Edward Island. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:563569.Google Scholar
21. Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1984. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) interference on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32:226234.Google Scholar
22. Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1983. Effect of irrigation on quackgrass (Agropwon repens) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:720727.Google Scholar