Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:44:23.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Soybean (Glycine max) Row Spacing on Chemical Control of Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Stacey A. Bruff
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Clyde A. Smith
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Sicklepod control with seven chemical treatments was evaluated in 25-cm and 97-cm soybean row widths. Metribuzin applied preplant incorporated followed by metribuzin applied preemergence, and metribuzin applied preplant incorporated followed by either imazaquin or chlorimuron applied postemergence controlled sicklepod over 90% early in the season, and row spacing did not influence control at that evaluation. In late season ratings, all herbicide treatments controlled sicklepod better in 25-cm rows than in 97-cm rows. However, only imazaquin applied sequentially or metribuzin followed by chlorimuron in 25-cm rows controlled sicklepod greater than 80% late in the season. Sicklepod control in 25-cm row soybean with either imazaquin or metribuzin plus chlorimuron applied preplant incorporated was equivalent to or better than sequential preemergence and postemergence treatments of these three herbicides in 97-cm rows. All treatments resulted in lower yields than the weed-free check in the 97-cm rows, whereas all herbicide treatments except the sequential application of metribuzin gave yields equivalent to the weed free check in 25-cm rows.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bridges, D. C., and Walker, R. H. 1987. Economics of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management. Weed Sci. 35:594598.Google Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C., and Walker, R. H. 1985. Influence of weed management and cropping systems on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed in the soil. Weed Sci. 33:800804.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., and Hauser, E. W. 1980. Influence of row spacing on competitiveness and yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) . Weed Sci. 28:401409.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) . Weed Sci. 28:258262.Google Scholar
5. Colvin, D. L., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M., and Walker, R. H. 1985. Weed management in minimum-tillage peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by cultivar, row spacing, and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33: 233237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Elmore, C. D. 1986. Weed survey–southern states. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 39:136.Google Scholar
7. Glaze, N. C., and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 1984. Competitive effects of sicklepod on lima beans. Weed Sci 32:13.Google Scholar
8. Griffin, B. S., Colvin, D. L., Brecke, B. J., and Currey, W. L. 1986. Effects of row spacing, tillage, and herbicide systems on weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci Soc. 39:74.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G., and Sciumbato, G. L. 1988. Effects of row spacing, benomyl, and duration of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference on soybean (Glycine max) yields. Weed Sci 36:254259.Google Scholar
10. Oliver, G. W., and York, A. C. 1988. Effect of row spacing on sicklepod control in soybeans with imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:295.Google Scholar
11. Perry, K. M., and Currey, W. L. 1986. Light interception and soil moisture usage by soybeans and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) under different row spacings and tillage systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:400.Google Scholar
12. Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacings, cultivations and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 13:285289.Google Scholar
13. Shaw, D. R. 1987. Sicklepod control in soybeans with Canopy, Scepter, and Classic. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Vol 12, No. 20. 4 p.Google Scholar
14. Shaw, D. R., and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicides and cultivation for sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia, control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:187190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Shaw, D. R., Smith, C. A., and Snipes, C. E. 1989. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max) grown in rotations of 97- and 18-cm row spacings. Weed Sci 37:748752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Shaw, D. R., Snipes, C. E., and Whatley, L. L. 1986. Chemical control of sicklepod in soybeans. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Vol. 11, No. 12. 4 p.Google Scholar
17. Smith, C. A., Shaw, D. R., and Wixson, M. B. 1990. Reducing sicklepod interference with soybeans by preplant applications of imazaquin or chlorimuron plus metribuzin. Weed Sci Soc. Abstr. 30:161.Google Scholar
18. Street, J. E., Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., and McGuire, J. A. 1981. Influence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) densities on competitiveness of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 29:253256.Google Scholar
19. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci 28:6871.Google Scholar
20. Thurlow, D. L., and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379384.Google Scholar
21. Walker, R. H., Patterson, M. G., Hauser, E., Isenhour, D. J., Todd, J. W., and Buchanan, G. A. 1984. Effects of insecticide, weed-free period, and row spacing on soybean (Glycine max) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) growth. Weed Sci. 32:702706.Google Scholar
22. Wax, L. M., and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci 16:462465.Google Scholar