Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:31:13.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Glyphosate Application Timing and Row Spacing on Weed Growth in Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Caleb D. Dalley
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
James J. Kells*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Karen A. Renner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: kells@msu.edu

Abstract

Corn and soybean were planted in narrow- and wide-row spacings to study the effects of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on light interception and subsequent weed growth. Corn planted in narrow rows (38 cm) had greater light interception than corn planted in wide rows (76 cm) from 35 to 55 d after crop emergence. Soybean planted in narrow rows (both 19 and 38 cm) had greater light interception throughout the growing season than soybean in 76-cm rows. At maximum canopy closure, narrow-row soybean (both 19 and 38 cm) intercepted more light than narrow-row corn. Biomass of weeds emerging after glyphosate application was greater when soybean was planted in 76-cm than in 19- or 38-cm rows. However, weed biomass was generally similar in both row spacings of corn. Sequential glyphosate applications reduced weed biomass in corn each year compared with a single glyphosate application at the 5-cm weed height. Sequential glyphosate applications that followed initial glyphosate application to 10- or 15-cm-tall weeds did not reduce weed biomass compared with a single application.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:394398.Google Scholar
Board, J. E. and Harville, B. G. 1993. Soybean yield component responses to a light interception gradient during the reproductive period. Crop Sci. 33. 772777.Google Scholar
Board, J. E. and Harville, B. G. 1996. Growth dynamics during the vegetative period affects yield of narrow-row late-planted soybean. Agron. J 88:567572.Google Scholar
Bullock, D., Khan, S., and Rayburn, A. 1998. Soybean yield response to narrow rows is largely due to enhanced early growth. Crop Sci 38:10111016.Google Scholar
Bullock, D. G., Nielsen, R. L., and Nyquist, W. E. 1988. A growth analysis comparison of corn grown in conventional and equidistant plant spacing. Crop Sci 25:254258.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and Kells, J. J. 1995. Timing of total postemergence herbicide applications to maximize weed control and corn yield. Weed Technol. 9:356361.Google Scholar
Egli, D. B. 1994. Mechanisms responsible for soybean yield response to equidistant patterns. Agron. J 86:10461049.Google Scholar
Ethridge, W. J. Jr., Ashley, D. A., and Woodruff, J. M. 1989. Row spacing and plant population effects on yield components of soybean. Agron. J. 81. 947951.Google Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., Cardina, J., and Harrison, S. K. 2002. Effect of planting date, residual herbicide, and postemergence application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-tolerant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:488494.Google Scholar
Ikeda, T. 1992. Soybean planting patterns in relation to yield and yield components. Agron. J 84:923926.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A., Hoverstad, T. R., and Greenwald, R. E. 1998. Integrated weed management using narrow row corn spacing, herbicides, and cultivation. Agron. J 90:4046.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281283.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 10:957962.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Renner, K. A. 1997. Weed control using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in narrow and wide row soybean. J. Prod. Agric 10:431437.Google Scholar
Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacing, cultivation, and herbicides for weed control in soybean. Weeds. 13. 285289.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, mobility, and microbial degradation of glyphosate in the soil. Weed Sci. 23:229234.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1995. Influence of narrow row/high population corn (Zea mays) on weed control and light transmittance. Weed Technol. 9:113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 1999. Influence of herbicide application rate, timing, and interrow cultivation on weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield in glufosinate-resistant and glyphosate-resistant corn. Weed Technol. 13:807813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, B. E., Schabenberger, O., and Kells, J. J. 1999. Response of weeds to glufosinate and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 13:542547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. A., and Majek, B. A. 2000. Optimum glyphosate timing with and without residual herbicides in glyphosate resistant soybean (Glycine max) under full-season conventional tillage. Weed Technol. 14:140149.Google Scholar
Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybean. Weed Sci. 16:462465.Google Scholar
Widdicombe, W. D. and Thelen, K. D. 2002. Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the Northern corn belt. Agron. J 94:10201023.Google Scholar