Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T21:32:01.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Rush Skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea) with Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Heap*
Affiliation:
South Australian Dep. Agric., Northfield Laboratories, GPO Box 1671, Adelaide, South Australia 5001

Abstract

A range of herbicide treatments was evaluated for long-term control of rush skeletonweed, a perennial weed of crops and pastures in North and South America, the Mediterranean region, central Europe, and Australia. Clopyralid (75 to 300 g ai/ha) and clopyralid mixtures with 2,4-D, MCPA, or dicamba were effective, resulting in survival rates of 0 to 4% for the most successful treatments applied for three consecutive seasons. Metsulfuron (9 g ai/ha) and 2,4-D (850 g ai/ha) significantly reduced survival when applied at high rates for three years. Barley yield in the season following control was increased by up to 195 to 199% of yield from untreated plots. Evidence was found for differences in herbicide susceptibility between narrowleaf and broadleaf forms of rush skeletonweed.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous 1993. Cereal weed spraying guide. Government Printers, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
2. Burdon, J. J., Groves, R. H., and Cullen, J. M. 1981. The impact of biological control on the distribution and abundance of Chondrilla juncea in South-Eastern Australia. J. Appl. Ecol. 18:957966.Google Scholar
3. Cheney, T. M., Belles, W. S., and Lee, G. A. 1980. Herbicidal control of rush skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea L.). Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 33:5256.Google Scholar
4. Cullen, J. M. The current status of research on the biological control of skeleton weed. Proc. Aust. Workshop on the Management of Skeleton Weed. Walpeup, Victoria, Australia, March, 1991.Google Scholar
5. Donald, W. W. and Prato, T. 1992. Efficacy and economics of herbicides for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control in no-till spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 40:233240.Google Scholar
6. Flint, J. L. and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of glyphosate combinations with 2,4-D or dicamba on field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 37:1218.Google Scholar
7. Heap, J. W. and Fischle, A. R. 1987. Control of skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea L.) with clopyralid in the South Australian Mallee. Plant Prot. Q. 2:132134.Google Scholar
8. Heap, J. W. and Mitchell, G. J. 1992. Yield increases in cereals following control of two perennial weeds in South Australia. Proc. First Int. Weed Control Congr., Melbourne, Australia, p. 216218.Google Scholar
9. Heering, D. C. and Peeper, T. F. 1991. Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with herbicides. Weed Technol. 5:411415.Google Scholar
10. McVean, D. N. 1966. Ecology of Chondrilla juncea L. in southeastern Australia. J. Ecol. 54:345365.Google Scholar
11. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1982. Selective control of Canada thistle in rapeseed with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62: 989993.Google Scholar
12. Panetta, F. D. and Dodd, J. 1987. The biology of Australian weeds. 16. Chondrilla juncea L. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 53:8395.Google Scholar
13. Parsons, W. T. and Cuthbertson, E. G. 1992. p. 264270 in Noxious Weeds of Australia. Inkata Press, Melbourne and Sydney.Google Scholar
14. Piper, G. L. 1983. Rush skeletonweed. Weeds Today 14(1):57.Google Scholar
15. Wells, G. J. 1971. The ecology and control of skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea) in Australia. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 37:122137.Google Scholar