Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:57:47.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Growth Regulator Preconditioned Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) with Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rodney G. Lym
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Neil E. Humburg
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

Abstract

The effect of various growth regulators on seedling field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L. # CONAR) growth and control with herbicides was evaluated. Fourteen growth regulators were applied at 0.38 to 380 g/ha 7 days before herbicide application in greenhouse, growth chamber and field studies. Field bindweed seedlings pretreated with growth regulators were more effectively controlled by herbicides compared to those not pretreated in greenhouse evaluations. Abscisic acid [[R-(Z,E)]-(+)-5-(1-hydroxy-2,6-6-trimethyl-4-oxo-2-cyclohexane-1-yl)-3-methyl-2,4-pentadicenoic acid] (ABA), ancymidol [a-cyclopropyl-a-(p-methoxyphenyl)-5-pyrimidine methanol], cycloheximide {3-[2-(3,5-dimethyl-2-oxocylohexyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]glutarimide}, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid [N,N′-1,2-ethanediyl-bis-(N-(carboxymethyl) glycine] (EDTA), and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) increased field bindweed stem length. Ancymidol and gibberellic acid [ent-3α,10,13-trihydroxy-20-norgibberell-1,16-diene-7,19-dioc acid 19,10-lactone] (GA) increased root weight, and GA increased root length. Cycloheximide, ethephon [(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid] and MH (1,2-dihydro-3,6-pyridazinedione) decreased field bindweed root weight. Ancymidol, GA and IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) increased the number of shoots per plant of seedling field bindweed. Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) efficacy was enhanced following field bindweed preconditioning with ethephon and IAA. Ancymidol and cycloheximide applied as pretreatments increased glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] activity on seedling field bindweed. Ancymidol and IAA pretreatment improved field bindweed control with triclopyr {[(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acid}. Herbicide-growth regulator combination treatments that increased field bindweed control in greenhouse and growth chamber studies did not increase top growth control in the field.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amy, A. C. 1932. Variation in organic reserves in underground parts of five perennial weeds from late April to November. Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 84.Google Scholar
2. Bakke, A. L. 1939. Experiments on the control of European bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.). Iowa State College Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 259. p. 365400.Google Scholar
3. Bakke, A. L., Gaessler, W. G., and Loomis, W. E. 1939. Relation of root reserves to control of European bindweed. Iowa State College Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 254. p. 114144.Google Scholar
4. Barr, C. G. 1936. Preliminary studies on the carbohydrates in the roots of bindweed. Am. Soc. Agron. J. 28:787798.Google Scholar
5. Bendixen, L. E. 1970. Altering growth form to precondition yellow nutsedge for control. Weed Sci. 18:599603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Bonnett, H. T., and Torrey, J. G. 1965. Auxin transport in Convolvulus roots cultured in vivo . Plant Physiol. 40:813815.Google Scholar
7. Crafts, A. S. 1956. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-D by wild morning-glory. Hilgardia 26:335365.Google Scholar
8. Gray, G. P. 1917. Spraying for the control of wild morning-glory within the fog belt. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 168.Google Scholar
9. Stewart, G., and Pittman, D. W. 1924. Ridding the land of morning-glory. Utah Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 189.Google Scholar
10. Swan, D. G., and Chancellor, R. J. 1976. Regeneration capacity of field bindweed roots. Weed Sci. 24:306308.Google Scholar