Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:10:20.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carrot (Daucus carota) and Weed Response to Linuron and Metribuzin Applied at Different Crop Stages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robin R. Bellinder
Affiliation:
Department of Fruit and Vegetable Science, 134-A Plant Science Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Jonathan J. Kirkwyland
Affiliation:
Department of Fruit and Vegetable Science, 134-A Plant Science Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Russell W. Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Fruit and Vegetable Science, 134-A Plant Science Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-0327

Abstract

Redroot pigweed and common lambsquarters control was variable within and between seasons when postemergence linuron and metribuzin were applied one or two times at below-labeled rates to one-, three-, or five-leaf carrots. A single, low-rate application of either herbicide at the one-or three-leaf stage of carrots failed to provide adequate season-long broadleaf weed control. Two low-rate applications to either one- + three- or three- + five-leaf carrots significantly improved control. Linuron produced little or no injury to carrots regardless of application timing. Metribuzininduced injury was variable initially and decreased to 10% or less by 14 d after treatment. One application of either linuron or metribuzin resulted in reduced yields of carrots.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1996. Pest Management Recommendations for Commercial Vegetable and Potato Production. Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. 235 p.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. L. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybean (Glycine max) with reduced bentazon rates and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41:447453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethe, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnett, C. W. 1955. A multiple comparisons procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50:10961121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingaman, T. E., King, C. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Effect of application rate, weed species, and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity. Weed Sci. 40:227232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuratle, H. and Rahn, E. M. 1968. Weed control in carrots with linuron and prometryne. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 92:465472.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. 1990. Vegetable weed control with minimal herbicide inputs. Hortic. Sci. 25:155159.Google Scholar
Sweet, R. D., Dewey, J. E., Lisk, D. J., Mullison, W. R., Rutz, D. R., and Smith, W. G. 1990. Pesticides and safety of fruits and vegetables. Ames, IA: Council of Agricultural Science and Technology. Comments from CAST 1990-1. 15 p.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1990. Low-rate applications of herbicides in conventional and reduced tillage potatoes. Weed Technol. 4:509513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1992. Alternative tillage and herbicide options for successful weed control in vegetables. Hortic. Sci. 27:745749.Google Scholar