Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T08:27:20.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antagonism of Cyhalofop Grass Activity by Halosulfuron, Triclopyr, and Propanil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric F. Scherder*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Mike L. Lovelace
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: escherd@uark.edu

Abstract

Field experiments in 2001 and 2002 at Stuttgart, AR, demonstrated cyhalofop applied POST controlled propanil-susceptible barnyardgrass, propanil-resistant barnyardgrass, and broadleaf signalgrass 67, 65, and 71%, respectively 28 days after treatment (DAT). Halosulfuron applied 1 d before cyhalofop or applied in a tank-mixture reduced broadleaf signalgrass and propanil-resistant or propanil-susceptible barnyardgrass by 35 to 59 percentage points. Triclopyr applied 5, 3, or 1 d before, or mixed with, cyhalofop reduced control of propanil-resistant and propanil-susceptible barnyardgrass, 16 to 41 percentage points, respectively. Triclopyr applied 1 d before cyhalofop or combined with cyhalofop reduced broadleaf signalgrass control 38 and 18 percentage points, respectively compared with cyhalofop alone. Propanil reduced cyhalofop grass control only when mixed with cyhalofop. Application timings, averaged across halosulfuron, propanil, and triclopyr, made 1 d before cyhalofop or tank-mixed with cyhalofop reduced grass control more compared with other application timings made before or after cyhalofop. Barnyardgrass absorption of 14C-cyhalofop alone or mixed with propanil was 86 and 75%, respectively, with 14C-cyhalofop translocation being reduced by 10-fold when propanil was mixed with cyhalofop. Reductions in cyhalofop translocation in combination with propanil may have partially explained the reductions in grass control observed in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Brommer, C. L., Shaw, D. R., Duke, S. O., Reddy, K. N., and Willeford, K. O. 2000. Antagonism of clefoxydim by selected broadleaf herbicides and the role of ethanol. Weed Sci. 48:181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehring, N. W., Baldwin, F. L., and Talbert, R. E. 2000. Comparison of new graminicides in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:16.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., Corbin, F. T., and Sheldon, Y. S. 1999. Basis for antagonism in mixtures of bromoxynil plus quizalofop-P applied to yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca). Weed Technol. 13:515519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Jennings, K. M., and Batts, R. B. 1998. Interaction of bromoxynil and postemergence graminicides on large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis). Weed Technol. 12:554559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschamps, R. J. A., Hsiao, A. I., and Quick, W. A. 1990. Antagonistic effect of MCPA on fenoxaprop activity. Weed Sci. 38:6266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrios, A. N., Koutroubas, S. D., and Mavrotas, C. 2000. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with cyhalofop-butyl. Weed Technol. 14:383388.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. A. and Drexler, D. M. 1980. Interactions of diclofop-mehtyl and 2, 4-D in cultivated oats (Avena sativa). Weed Sci. 28:363366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M. 1989. Herbicide antagonism at the whole plant level. Weed Technol. 3:217226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagar, A. G., Wax, L. M., Bollero, G. A., and Stoller, E. W. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1938. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agriculture Experiment Station Circular 347:139.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Influence of adjuvants on the antagonism of graminicides by broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 9:741747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Smith, M. C., McClelland, M. R., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Weed control with bromoxynil applied alone and with graminicides. Weed Technol. 7:835839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassiter, R. B., Simpson, D. M., Grant, D. L., Richburg, J. S., Langston, V. B., and Mann, R. K. 2000. Efficacy and crop tolerance of cyhalofop post-applied in direct seeded rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:170.Google Scholar
Lovelace, M. L., Talbert, R. E., Buehring, N. W., and Scherder, E. F. 2001. Weed control spectrum of new postemergence rice herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:45.Google Scholar
Minton, B. A., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with grass and broadleaf weed herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 37:223227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmes, G. A., Kendig, J. A., Grant, D. L., Lassiter, R. B., Simpson, D. M., Kurtz, M. E., Klosterboer, A. D., Talbert, R. E., Baldwin, F. L., and Williams, B. J. 2000. Efficacy and crop tolerance of cyhalofop programs applied pre-flood in direct-seeded rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:42.Google Scholar
Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Antagonistic effects on MCPA on wild oat (Avena fatua) control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 29:566571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, E. W., Shaw, D. R., and Holloway, J. C. Jr. 1999. Influence of CGA-277476 on efficacy of postemergence graminicides. Weed Technol. 13:4853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, F. S., Tomaso, J. M., and Neal, J. C. 1993. Fate of fenoxaprop-ethyl applied to moisture-stressed smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum). Weed Sci. 41:335340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:686692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. L., Namenek, R. C., Branson, J. W., and Baldwin, F. L. 2002. Antagonism with tank mixes of new rice and cotton herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:39.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (Oryza sativa) weed control with soil applications of quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7:600604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Blouin, D. C. 1995. Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 9:6872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar