Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:39:59.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of Field Lysimeter Studies to Describe the Environmental Fate of Pesticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kim Winton  and
Jerome B. Weber
Kim Winton
Affiliation:
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, NC 27419
Jerome B. Weber
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dept., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A brief review is presented for the use of soil lysimeters in studying transpiration, evapotranspiration, moisture, and nutrient movement in earlier times and pesticide dissipation and movement, and mass-balance of pesticide dissipation in more recent times. The important factors needed to understand research findings and to model pesticide dissipation such as key soil and site characteristics, climatic conditions, and the methods involved are discussed. Several case studies carried out by Ciba and North Carolina State University are discussed and current developments in soil column field lysimeters are presented.

Keywords

Pesticide dissipationpesticide leachabilitypesticide movementsand pesticide volatilization
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 202 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aboukhaled, A., Alfaro, A., and Smith, M. 1982. Lysimeters. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. 68 pp.Google Scholar
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1987. Standard guide for conducting a terrestrial soil-core microcosm test. Publ. E-1197. Philadelphia, PA. p. 403–415.Google Scholar
3. Bergstrom, L. 1990. Leaching of chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron methyl in three Swedish soils measured in field lysimeters. J. Environ. Qual. 19:701–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bergstrom, L. 1990. Use of lysimeters to estimate leaching of pesticides in agricultural soils. Environ. Pollut. 67:325–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Bergstrom, L. 1990. Leaching of dichlorprop in sand and clay soils measured in field lysimeters. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 20:115–119.Google Scholar
6. Bergstrom, L. F. and Jarvis, N. J. 1993. Leaching of dichlorprop, bentazon, and 36Cl in undisturbed field lysimeters of different agricultural soils. Weed Sci. 41:251–261.Google Scholar
7. Bergstrom, L. F., McGibbon, A. S., Day, S. R., and Snel, M. 1990. Leaching potential and decomposition of fluroxypyr in Swedish soils under field conditions. Pestic. Sci. 29:405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Best, J. A. and Weber, J. B. 1974. Disappearance of s-triazines as affected by soil pH using a balance-sheet approach. Weed Sci. 22:364–373.Google Scholar
9. Bowman, B. T. 1988. Mobility and persistence of metolachlor and aldicarb in field lysimeters. J. Environ. Qual. 17:689–694.Google Scholar
10. Carsel, R. F., Smith, L. A., Dean, J. D., and Jowise, P. P. 1984. User's Manual for the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM): Release 1. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, 600/3-84-109. U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
11. Edwards, W. M. and Glass, B. L. 1971. Methoxychlor and 2,4,5-T in lysimeter percolation and runoff water. Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 6:81–84.Google Scholar
12. Fermanich, K. J., Daniel, T. C. and Lowery, B. 1991. Microlysimeter soil columns for evaluating pesticide movement through the root zone. J. Environ. Qual. 20:189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Furh, R. 1985. Application of 14C-labeled herbicides in lysimeter studies. Weed Sci. 33(Suppl. 2): 11–17.Google Scholar
14. Hardy, D. H. and Weber, J. B. 1994. Atrazine dissipation: A mass balance approach using field lysimeters. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:207–211.Google Scholar
15. Herman, E. N., Miller, C. T., Grant, J. D., and Weber, J. B. 1993. An analysis of metolachlor sorption and transport in heterogeneous subsurface systems. Abstr. No. H21A-11, Vol. 74, No. 16, p. 130, Am. Geophysical Union, Mineralog. Soc. Am., and Geochem. Soc. Meetings, May 24–28, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
16. Joffe, J. S. 1932. Lysimeter studies. I. Moisture percolation through the soil profile. Soil Sci. 34:123–143.Google Scholar
17. Jordan, C. F. 1968. A simple, tension-free lysimeter. Soil Sci. 105:81–86.Google Scholar
18. Keller, K. E. 1992. Movement and dissipation of atrazine, metolachlor, and primisulfuron in field lysimeters. , Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC. 325 p.Google Scholar
19. Kilmer, V. J., Hays, O. E., and Muckenhirn, R. J. 1944. Plant nutrients and water losses from Fayette silt loam as measured by monolith lysimeters. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 36:249–263.Google Scholar
20. Kohnke, H., Dreibelbis, F. R., and Davidson, J. M. 1940. A survey and discussion of lysimeters and a bibliography on their construction and performance. Misc. Publ. No. 374, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. 68 p.Google Scholar
21. Kubiak, R., Fuhr, F., Mittelstaedt, W., Hansper, M., and Steffens, W. 1988. Transferability of lysimeter results to actual field situations. Weed Sci. 36:514–518.Google Scholar
22. Lawrence, L. J., Ruzo, L. O., and Olsen, G. L. 1991. Method and apparatus for conducting field dissipation and leaching studies. PTRL East, Inc., Richmond, KY. U.S. Patent No. 5,009, 112. U.S. Patent Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
23. Lee, R. F. and Weber, J. B. 1993. Influence of polymers on the mobility, loss, and bioactivity of 14C from 14C-labeled atrazine, metolachlor, and primisulfuron. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41:988–995.Google Scholar
24. Manual for Chemical Waste Management. 1994. Department of Environmental Health and Hazardous Materials Management, Life Safety Services. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 49 p.Google Scholar
25. McMahon, M. A. and Thomas, G. W. 1974. Chloride ancl tritialed water flow in disturbed and undisturbed soil cores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38:727–732.Google Scholar
26. Nelson, E. M. 1991. An investigation into the effects of heterogeneity on subsurface flow and transport. , Dep. of Environ. Sci. and Eng., Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 71 p.Google Scholar
27. O'Conner, G. A., Wierenga, P. J., Cheng, H. H., and Doxtader, K. G. 1980. Movement of 2,4,5-T through large soil columns. Soil Sci. 130:157–162.Google Scholar
28. Richter, G. and Jury, W. A. 1986. A microlysimeter field study of solute transport through a structured sandy loam soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:863–868.Google Scholar
29. Stauffer, R. S. and Smith, R. S. 1937. Variation in soils with respect to the disposition of natural precipitation. J. Agron. 29:917–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Taylor, K. A. and Weber, J. B. 1994. Movement of atrazine, metolachlor and primisulfuron in four soils after one growing season. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:212.Google Scholar
31. Tyler, D. D. and Thomas, G. W. 1977. Lysimeter measurements of nitrate and chloride losses from soil under conventional and no-tillage corn. J. Environ. Qual. 6:63–66.Google Scholar
32. Warren, R. L. and Weber, J. B. 1994. Evaluating pesticide movement in North Carolina soils. Proc. Soil Sci. North Carolina 37:31–41.Google Scholar
33. Weber, J. B. 1972. Model soil systems, herbicide leaching, and sorption. p. 145–160 in Wilkinson, R. E., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Southern Weed Science Society, POP Enterprises, Inc., Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
34. Weber, J. B. 1995. Physicochemical and mobility studies with pesticides. p. 99–115 in Leng, M. L., Leovey, E.M.K., and Zubkoff, P. L., eds. Agrochemical Environmental Fate Studies: State of the Art. Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
35. Weber, J. B., Cassel, D. K., Wollum, A. G., and Miller, C. T. 1993. Dissipation and movement of chemicals and water in natural soil cores—A cooperative study. p. 196–206 in Reagan, B. M., Huck, J. and Porter, J., eds. Consumer Environmental Issues: Safety, Health, Chemicals and Textiles in the Near Environment. 2nd Int. Symp. U.S.D.A./CRS and the Univ. Georgia. Kansas State University Publ., Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
36. Weber, J. B. and Keller, K. E. 1994. Mobility of pesticides in field lysimeters. p. 43–62 in Honeycutt, R. C. and Schabacker, D. J., eds. Mechanisms of Pesticide Movement into Ground Water. Lewis Publishers/CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
37. Weber, J. B. and Peeper, T. F. 1993. Herbicide mobility in soils. p. 73–78 in Truelove, B., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science, 2nd. ed., Southern Weed Science Society, Auburn Printing, Inc., Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
38. Weber, J. B., Swain, L. R., Strek, H. J., and Sartori, J. L. 1986. Herbicide mobility in soil leaching columns. p. 190–200 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science, 3rd. ed., Southern Weed Science Society, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
39. White, R. E., Dyson, J. S., Gerstl, Z., and Yaron, B. 1986. Leaching of herbicides through undisturbed cores of a structured clay soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:277–283.Google Scholar
40. White, R. E., Thomas, G. W., and Smith, M. S. 1984. Modelling water flow through undisturbed soil cores using a transfer function model derived from 3HOH and Cl transport. J. Soil Sci. 35:159–168.Google Scholar
41. Witt, W. W. and Weber, J. B. 1975. Ethylene adsorption and movement in soils and adsorption by soil constituents. Weed Sci. 23:302–307.Google Scholar
42. Zins, A. B., Wyse, D. L., and Koskinen, W. C. 1991. Effect of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) roots on movement of atrazine and alachlor through soil. Weed Sci. 39:262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar