Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:31:43.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pendimethalin Applications in Stale Seedbed Rice Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason A. Bond ,
Timothy W. Walker  and
Clifford H. Koger
Jason A. Bond*
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
Timothy W. Walker
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
Clifford H. Koger
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jbond@drec.msstate.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 2005 through 2007 to determine the response of three rice cultivars (‘Cocodrie’, ‘Wells’, and ‘Lemont’) to three application timings and two formulations of pendimethalin in a stale seedbed rice production system. Pendimethalin formulated as an emulsifiable concentrate and capsule suspension was applied to rice 0, 3, and 7 d after planting. No visual injury was detected for any cultivar. Seedling density, days to 50% heading, and rice yield were not affected by pendimethalin formulation or application timing. The practice of planting cultivars with excellent seedling vigor into nondisturbed soils with greater available moisture could provide an opportunity to use pendimethalin as a preemergence herbicide for rice production.

Keywords

Pendimethalinrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Cocodrie’, ‘Wells’, ‘Lemont’Application timingconservation tillageherbicide formulationherbicide tolerance
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 167 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2006. Rice 2007 Planning Budgets. December 2006. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2006-04.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2007. 2007 Weed Control Guidelines for Mississippi. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Extensions Service and Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Publ. 1532.Google Scholar
Bollich, C. N., Webb, B. D., Marchetti, M. A., and Scott, J. E. 1985. Registration of ‘Lemont’ rice. Crop Sci 25:883–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollich, P. K. and Feagley, S. E. 1994. A comparison of water-seeded rice management systems: potential improvements in water quality. Pages 64–69. in Mullen, M. D. and Duck, B. N., editors. Proceedings of the Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture. Jackson and Milan, TN. July 21–23, 1992. Knoxville Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Bollich, P. K., Jordan, D. L., Walker, D. M., and Burns, A. N. 2000. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to microencapsulated formulation of clomazone. Weed Technol 14:89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J. A., Walker, T. W., Bollich, P. K., Koger, C. H., and Gerard, P. 2005. Seeding rates for stale seedbed rice production in the midsouthern United States. Agron J 97:1560–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences in combined analyses of experiments with two- or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feagley, S. E., Sigua, G. C., Bengston, R. L., Bollich, P. K., and Linscombe, S. D. 1992. Effects of different management practices on surface water quality from rice fields in south Louisiana. J. Plant Nutr 15:1305–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzinikolaou, A. S., Eleftherohorinos, I. G., and Vasilakoglou, I. B. 2004. Influence of formulation on the activity and persistence of pendimethalin. Weed Technol 18:397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, C. H., Walker, T. W., and Krutz, L. J. 2006. Response of three rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars to pendimethalin application, planting depth, and rainfall. Crop Prot 25:684–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscombe, S. D., Jodari, F., Bollich, P. K., Groth, D. E., White, L. M., Chu, Q. R., Dunand, R. T., and Sanders, D. E. 2000. Registration of ‘Cocodrie’ rice. Crop Sci 40:294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscombe, S. D., Saichuk, J. K., Seilhan, K. P., Bollich, P. K., and Funderburg, E. R. 1999. General agronomic guidelines. Pages 5–12. in. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Agricultural Center Publ. 2321.Google Scholar
Levy, R. J. Jr., Bond, J. A., Webster, E. P., Griffin, J. L., and Linscombe, S. D. 2006. Effect of cultural practices on weed control and crop response in imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Technol 20:239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. C. and Street, J. E. 1999. Mississippi Rice Growers Guide. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Extension Service and Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Moldenhauer, K. K., Inventor 2001. 8 28. Rice cultivar wells. U.S. patent 6281,416.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2007. Agricultural Statistics Database—U.S. & All States Data—Crops. http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/PullData_US.jsp. Accessed: December 7, 2007.Google Scholar
Pantone, D. J. and Baker, J. B. 1992. Varietal tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) to bromoxynil and triclopyr at different growth stages. Weed Technol 6:969–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, B. D. and Penner, D. 1990. The use of controlled-release technology for herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci 5:1–14.Google Scholar
SAS 2003. The SAS System for Windows. Release 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Saxton, A. M. 1998. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Pages 1243–1246. in. Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International, Nashville, TN, March 22–25. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Slaton, N. A. and Cartwright, R. D. 2001. Rice stand establishment. Pages 21–28. in. Rice Production Handbook. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Publ. MP 192.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1983. Competition of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 31:120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, J. E. and Bollich, P. K. 2003. Rice production. Pages 271–296. in Smith, C. W. and Dilday, R. H., editors. Rice: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Lanham, D. J. 1996. Pendimethalin as a delayed preemergence herbicide in rice. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Extension Service and Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bulletin 1064.Google Scholar
Van Valkenburg, J. W. 1983. Terminology, classification, and chemistry. Pages 1–9. in. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. and Webster, E. P. 2002. Shoot and root growth of rice (Oryza sativa) in response to V-10029. Weed Technol 16:768–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., Blouin, D. C., and Linscombe, S. D. 2004. Differential tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to clomazone. Weed Technol 18:73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar