Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-fpcrz Total loading time: 0.276 Render date: 2022-06-26T16:40:11.677Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Interactions of quizalofop-p-ethyl mixed with contact herbicides in ACCase-resistant rice production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2019

Samer Y. Rustom
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Benjamin M. McKnight
Affiliation:
Research Associate, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Eric P. Webster, Email: ewebster@agcenter.lsu.edu

Abstract

A field study was conducted in 2015 and 2016 near Crowley, LA, to evaluate antagonistic, synergistic, or neutral interactions of quizalofop when mixed with contact herbicides labeled for use in rice production. Quizalofop was applied at 120 g ai ha−1. Mixture herbicides included bentazon at 1,050 g ai ha−1, carfentrazone at 18 g ai ha−1, propanil at 3,360 g ai ha−1, saflufenacil at 25 g ai ha−1, and thiobencarb at 3,360 g ai ha−1. A second application of quizalofop at 120 g ha−1 was made at 28 d after the initial application (DAIT) to evaluate control of weeds escaping the initial treatment. At 14 and 28 DAIT, red rice, ‘CLXL-745’, and ‘CL-111’ treated with quizalofop plus propanil indicated an antagonistic response with an observed control of 69% to 71% compared with an expected control of 92% to 94%. Barnyardgrass treated with the same mixture also indicated an antagonistic response at 14 and 28 DAIT with an observed control of 16% compared with an expected control of 94%. Barnyardgrass treated with quizalofop plus saflufenacil indicated an antagonistic response at 14 DAIT; however, the same mixture produced a neutral response by 28 DAIT. In addition, a second application of quizalofop was not able to overcome the antagonism observed with a quizalofop plus propanil mixture at 14 and 28 DAIT for red rice, CLXL-745, CL-111, or barnyardgrass control. Quizalofop mixed with carfentrazone or thiobencarb produced a neutral response for all weeds evaluated at each evaluation date.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askew, SD, Shaw, DR, Street, JE (1998) Red rice (Oryza sativa) control and seedhead reduction with glyphosate. Weed Technol 12:504506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnwell, P, Cobb, AH (1994) Graminicide antagonism by broadleaf weed herbicides. Pest Sci 41:7785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenbaum, MC (1981) Criteria for analyzing interactions between biologically active agents. Adv Cancer Res 35:269335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beste, CE (1983) Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 515 pGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, O’Donovan, JT (2006) Broadleaf herbicide effects on clethodim and quizalofop-p efficacy on volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 20:221226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2010) On a method of analysis for synergistic and antagonistic joint-action effects with fenoxaprop mixtures in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 24:583589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2008) Red rice (Oryza sativa) status after 5 years of imidazolinone-resistant rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:200208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, JD, Gronwald, JW, Somers, DA, Gengenbach, BG, Wyse, DI (1989) Inhibition of corn acetyl-CoA carboxylase by cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Pest Biochem Physiol 34:7685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, VF III, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2011) Imazethapyr plus propanil programs in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 25:205211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, SG, Nyuist, WE, Walker, WM (1989) Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigmiles, JP (1978) Introduction. in Eastin, EF, ed. Red Rice Research and Control. College Station, TX: Tex Agric Exp Stn Bull B-1270. Pp. 56Google Scholar
Croughan, TP, inventor; Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, Mechanical College, assignee (1999) September 14. Herbicide resistant rice. US patent 5,952,553Google Scholar
Croughan, TP (2003) Clearfield rice: it’s not a GMO. La Agric 46:2426Google Scholar
De Wet, JM, Harlan, JR (1975) Weeds and domesticates: evolution in the man-made habitat. Econ Bot 29:99108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, RE (1980) Physiological interaction, its mathematical expression. Weed Sci 28:573579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estorninos, LE Jr, Gealy, DR, Gbur, EE, Talbert, RE, McClelland, MR (2005) Rice and red rice interference. II. Rice response to population densities of three red rice (Oryza sativa) ecotypes. Weed Sci 53:683689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2015) Imazethapyr co-application interactions in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 29:689696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2016) Imazamox plus propanil mixtures for grass weed management in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 30:2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focke, M, Lichtenthaler, HK (1987) Notes: inhibition of the Acetyl-CoA carboxylase of barley chloroplasts by cycloxydim and sethoxydim. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 42:13611363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, DR, Mitten, DH, Rutger, JN (2003) Gene flow between red rice (Oryza sativa) and herbicide-resistant rice (O. sativa): implications for weed management. Weed Technol 17:627645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, DR, Yan, W, Rutger, JN (2006) Red rice (Oryza sativa) plant types affect growth, coloration, and flowering characteristics of first- and second generation crosses with rice. Weed Technol 20:839852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J, Valverde, BE (2009) A strategy to provide long-term control of weedy rice while mitigating herbicide resistance transgene flow, and its potential use for other crops with related weeds. Pest Manag Sci 65:723731CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Bollero, GA, Stroller, EW (2003) Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max.). Weed Technol 17:1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, KK, Penner, D (1985) Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev Weed Sci 1:163Google Scholar
Kwon, SL, Smith, RJ Jr, Talbert, RE (1992) Comparative growth and development of red rice (Oryza sativa) and rice. Weed Sci 40:5762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, MS, Burgos, NR, Talbert, RE (2010) Confirmation and control of propanil-resistant and quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in rice. Weed Technol 24:226233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, JA, Webster, EP (2001) Use of imazethapyr in water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 15:103106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, BW, Shaw, DR, Kurtz, ME (1989) Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 3:329334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, PM (1978) Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci 26:5871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, RG (1981) Phytotoxic interaction studies—techniques for evaluation and presentation of results. Weed Sci 29:147155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oard, J, Cohn, MA, Linscombe, SD, Gealy, GR, Gravois, K (2000) Field evaluation of seed production, shattering, and dormancy in hybrid populations of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) and the weed red rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Sci 157:1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottis, BV, Mattice, JD, Talbert, RE (2005) Determination of antagonism between cyhalofop-butyl and other rice (Oryza sativa) herbicides in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Agric Food Chem 53:40644068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP (2004) Imazethapyr at different rates and timings in drill- and water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Technol 18:223227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2003) Herbicide mixtures in water-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:836841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajguru, SN, Burgos, NR, Shivrain, VK, Stewart, JM (2005) Mutations in the red rice ALS gene associated with resistance to imazethapyr. Weed Sci 53:567577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Srivastava, V, Nandula, V, Bond, J A, Scott, RC (2013) Physiological and molecular basis of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicide resistance in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Agric Food Chem 61:278289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustom, SY, Webster, EP, Bergeron, EA, McKnight, BM (2015) Management of weedy rice utilizing crop rotation. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 69:108Google Scholar
Rustom, SY, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2018) Interactions between quizalofop-p-ethyl and acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in acetyl-coA carboxylase inhibitor-resistant rice production. Weed Technol 32:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 254255Google Scholar
Shivrain, VK, Burgos, NR, Anders, MM, Rajguru, SN, Moore, J, Sales, MA (2007) Gene flow between Clearfield™ rice and red rice. Crop Protect 26:349356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1965) Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern US rice, Oryza sativa. Weed Technol 2:232241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr, Hill, JE (1990) Weed control technology in U.S. rice. in Grayson, BT, Green, MB, Copping, LG, eds. Pest Management in Rice. London: Elsevier Science. Pp. 314327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streibig, JC, Kudsk, P, Jensen, JE (1998) A general joint action model for herbicide mixtures. Pestic Sci 53:21283.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudianto, E, Beng-Kah, S, Ting-Xiang, N, Saldain, NE, Scott, RC, Burgos, NR (2013) Clearfield® rice: Its development, success, and key challenges on a global perspective. Crop Protect 49:4051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, RE, Burgos, NR (2007) History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:324331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, PR, Reynolds, DB, Blouin, DC (1995) Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol 9:6872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Carlson, TP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Imazethapyr plus residual herbicide programs for imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 26:410416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Teló, GM, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2017a) Imazethapyr plus propanil mixtures in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 32:4551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Teló, GM, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM, Bergeron, EA (2017b) Synergism with imazamox co-applications for red rice control. Weed Technol 31:373379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Leon, CT (2005) Fenoxaprop interactions for barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice. Weed Technol 19:293297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Interactions of quizalofop-p-ethyl mixed with contact herbicides in ACCase-resistant rice production
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Interactions of quizalofop-p-ethyl mixed with contact herbicides in ACCase-resistant rice production
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Interactions of quizalofop-p-ethyl mixed with contact herbicides in ACCase-resistant rice production
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *