Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T13:27:02.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Weed Control on Weeds: New Problems and Research Needs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jodie S. Holt
Jodie S. Holt*
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Concerns in the public and agricultural sectors about the impacts of agricultural practices have led many weed scientists to refocus research efforts toward development of alternative strategies of weed management. To develop methods of weed management that will supplement or replace herbicides, the impacts of agricultural practices on weeds must be better understood. With a foundation of knowledge in basic weed biology, alternatives to herbicides can be made available in the future.

Keywords

Alternativesweed adaptationweed biology
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 400 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aim, D. M., McGiffen, M. E. Jr., and Hesketh, J. D. 1991. Weed phenology. Chapter 17 in Hodges, T., ed. Predicting Crop Phenology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
2. Altieri, M. A. 1987. Agroecology. The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 227 p.Google Scholar
3. Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M. 1988. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL. 354 p.Google Scholar
4. Anderson, W. P. 1983. Weed Science: Principles. Second Edition. West Publishing Co., San Francisco, CA. 653 p.Google Scholar
5. Barrett, S.C.H. 1982. Genetic variation in weeds. Chapter 6 in Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L., eds. Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
6. Byrd, J. D. 1991. Report of the 1990 cotton weed loss committee. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf.—Cotton Weed Sci. Res. Conf. 15:949.Google Scholar
7. Cavers, P. B. 1985. Intractable weeds—intraspecific variation must be considered in formulating control measures. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds. p. 367–376.Google Scholar
8. Duke, S. O. 1992. Weed science—the need and the reality. Phytoparasitica 20:3.Google Scholar
9. Ghersa, C. M. and Roush, M. L. 1993. Searching for solutions to weed problems. Do we study competition or dispersion? Bioscience 43:104–109.Google Scholar
10. Goldberg, D. E. 1990. Components of resource competition in plant communities. Chapter 3 in Grace, J. B. and Tilman, D., eds. Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
11. Green, M. B., LeBaron, H. M., and Moberg, W. K., eds. 1990. Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals. From Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. No. 421. American Chemical Society Books, Washington, D.C. 496 p.Google Scholar
12. Gressel, J. 1992. Addressing real weed science needs with innovations. Weed Technol. 6:509–525.Google Scholar
13. Groves, R. H. and Burdon, J. J. 1986. Ecology of Biological Invasions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 166 p.Google Scholar
14. Heathman, S. 1990. Documentation of weed infestation in Arizona cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf.—Cotton Weed Sci. Res. Conf. 14:367.Google Scholar
15. Holt, J. S. 1991. Applications of physiological ecology to weed science. Weed Sci. 39:521–528.Google Scholar
16. Holt, J. S. 1992. History of identification of herbicide-resistant weeds. Weed Technol. 6:615–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Holt, J. S. and LeBaron, H. M. 1990. Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 4:141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Holt, J. S. and Orcutt, D. R. 1991. Functional relationships of growth and competitiveness in perennial weeds and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 39:575–584.Google Scholar
19. Horak, M. J. and Holt, J. S. 1986. Isozyme variability and breeding systems in populations of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34:538–543.Google Scholar
20. Jackson, W., Berry, W., and Colman, B., eds. 1984. Meeting the Expectations of the Land. Essays in Sustainable Agriculture and Stewardship. North Point Press, San Francisco, CA. 250 p.Google Scholar
21. Klinger, T., Arriola, P. E., and Ellstrand, N. C. 1992. Crop-weed hybridization in radish (Raphanus sativus): Effects of distance and population size. Am. J. Bot. 79:1431–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Kropff, M. J. 1988. Modeling the effects of weeds on crop production. Weed Res. 28:465–471.Google Scholar
23. LeBaron, H. M. 1991. Distribution and seriousness of herbicide-resistant weed infestations worldwide. p. 27–43 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd., Oxford, England.Google Scholar
24. Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T., and Simpson, R. L. 1989. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
25. Maxwell, B. D., Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol. 4:2–13.Google Scholar
26. Mortimer, A. M. 1987. The population ecology of weeds—implications for integrated weed management, forecasting and conservation. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds. p. 935–944.Google Scholar
27. National Research Council. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. Committee on the Role of Alternative Farming Methods in Modern Production Agriculture. Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 449 p.Google Scholar
28. Navas, M.-L. 1991. Using plant population biology in weed research: A strategy to improve weed management. Weed Res. 31:171–179.Google Scholar
29. Radosevich, S. R. and Ghersa, C. M. 1992. Weeds, crops, and herbicides: A modem-day “neckriddle.” Weed Technol. 6:788–795.Google Scholar
30. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Weed Ecology. Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. 265 p.Google Scholar
31. Radosevich, S. R. and Roush, M. L. 1990. The role of competition in agriculture. Chapter 16 in Grace, J. B. and Tilman, D., eds. Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
32. Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, MN. 340 p.Google Scholar
33. Roush, M. L., Jordan, N., and Holt, J. S. 1989. Ecological basis for weed biology in IPM. p. 137–156 in Glass, E. H., ed. Proc. National IPM Symposium/Workshop on Targeting Research for IPM Implementation. National IPM Coordinating Committee.Google Scholar