Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:51:50.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Displacement of Fluometuron and Diuron through Saturated Glass Beads and Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. M. Davidson  and
P. W. Santelmann
J. M. Davidson
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater
P. W. Santelmann
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solutions containing 3-(m-trifluromethylphenyl)-l,l-di-methylurea (fluometuron) or 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron) were displaced through saturated 250-μ glass beads or through Norge loam soil at two water flow rates. The procedure used allowed uniform application of herbicide solutions to the soil surface and subsequent displacement of the herbicide through soil or glass bead columns at a constant water flow rate. Fluometuron was as mobile as the chloride ion at both high and low flow rates. The shape of the fluometuron distribution curves obtained at the two flow rates were distinctly different. The volume of water required to displace fluometuron through a material that adsorbed the herbicide was greater than that necessary to displace the fluometuron through materials giving a smaller amount of adsorption. More diuron was adsorbed by the glass bead system than fluometuron.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 544 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., and Wicks, G. A. 1963. Dissipation and leaching of monuron, simazine and atrazine in Nebraska soils. Weeds 11:209–213.Google Scholar
2. Brenner, H. 1962. The diffusion model of longitudinal mixing in beds of finite length. Numerical Values. Chem. Engr. Sci. 17:229–243.Google Scholar
3. Doggins, C. W. and Crafts, A. S. 1959. Substituted urea herbicides: Their electrophoretic behavior and the influence of clay colloid in nutrient solution on their phytotoxicity. Weeds 7:349–358.Google Scholar
4. Davidson, J. M., Rieck, C. E., and Santelmann, P. W. 1968. Quantitative extraction of fluometuron from water samples by n-pentane. Weed Sci. 16: (in press).Google Scholar
5. Elrick, D. E., Erh, K. T., and Krupp, H. K. 1966. Application of miscible displacement techniques to soils. Water Resources Res. 2:717–272.Google Scholar
6. Kay, B. D. and Elrick, D. E. 1967. Adsorption and movement of lindane in soils. Soil Sci. 104:314–322.Google Scholar
7. Lambert, S. M., Porter, P. E., and Schiefertein, R. H. 1965. Movement and sorption of chemicals applied to the soils. Weeds 13:185–190.Google Scholar
8. Lapadus, L. and Amundson, N. R. 1952. Mathematics of adsorption in beds. VI. The effect so longitudional diffusion in ion exchange and chromatographic columns. J. Phys. Chem. 56:984–988.Google Scholar
9. Nielsen, D. R. and Biggar, J. W. 1962. Miscible displacement: III. Theoretical consideration. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 26:216–221.Google Scholar
10. Nielsen, D. R. and Biggar, J. W. 1961. Miscible displacement in soils: I. Experiment information. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 25:1–5.Google Scholar
11. Scott, D. C. and Weber, J. B. 1967. Herbicide phytotoxicity as influenced by adsorption. Soil Sci. 104:151–158.Google Scholar
12. Wang, J. H. 1952. Tracer-diffusion in liquids. III. The self-diffusion of chloride ion in aqueous chloride solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74:1612–1615.Google Scholar