Submitted manuscripts are first sent to the Editor-in-Chief who may render an immediate ‘reject without review’ decision should the manuscript be deemed unsuitable or inappropriate. Approved manuscripts will be assigned to an Associate Editor who will oversee the single-blind peer review process. The manuscript will be sent to at least two reviewers for comment. Authors can check the status of their submission in review by logging on to the online submission system. After an editorial decision is made, an email containing the comments from the reviewers and the editor will be sent to the author. The decision email is also accessible at the Author Center of the online system. The Editors and authors of Wearable Technologies all value the work done by referees greatly. Thank you.

Appeals Process

Appeals of editorial decisions will only be considered if they refer to a specific manuscript and must be based on evidence that either (1) an editor or reviewer made a significant factual error/a major misunderstanding of a manuscript, or (2) the integrity of the editorial decision making process was compromised.  In general, only one appeal per manuscript per decision stage will be considered. 

To make appeal against an editorial decision please send a rebuttal letter to wearabletechnologies@cambridge.org. Your letter should include details of your manuscript (title, author details, manuscript number) and explain clearly why you disagree with the editorial decision. If reviewer reports were included with the editorial decision, then these criticisms must be responded to in the rebuttal letter.

The journal Editor will consider your appeal. All appeal requests are handled on a case by case basis and the Editor's decision is final. If successful, an appeal can lead to the article’s re-entering the peer review process. If the appeal is rejected, then the original rejection decision is upheld and no further consideration of that article is possible.

New submissions to the journal take priority over appeals, so it may take a substantial period of time to reach a conclusion about your appeal.