Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:03:26.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SISTER OF THE TYPE: THE FEMINIST COLLECTIVE IN GRANT ALLEN'S THE TYPE-WRITER GIRL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2012

S. Brooke Cameron
S. Brooke Cameron*
Affiliation:
Concordia University (Montreal)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Grant Allen's short novelThe Type-Writer Girl (1897) opens with a problem. In the first lines we are introduced to our narrator who, we are promptly told, is unemployed: “I was twenty-two and without employment. I would not say by this that I was without occupation. In the world in which we live, set with daisies and kingfishers and undeciphered faces of men and women, I doubt I could be at a loss for something to occupy me” (23; ch. 1). As the second half of this quotation suggests, our narrator is confident that this problem of employment is quite easy to solve, for all around is a world teeming with life, and as we learn by the start of the next paragraph, our narrator does indeed have an occupation, something to fill his/her time. Our narrator is a storyteller: “I cannot choose but wonder who each is, and why he is here. For one after another I invent a story. It may not be the true story, but at least it amuses me” (23; ch. 1). So the real problem, beyond the question of employment, emerges as a question of narrative subject. Who is this narrator, the subject of this first-person story? We do not even know if our narrator is male or female. It is as if he/she is lost amidst that sea of “undeciphered faces of men and women.” Connected to this problem of subject is also the question of form. The first-person point of view would suggest an autobiographical narrative. Yet any expectations of an autobiographical account are immediately undermined in chapter two when we learn that our narrator is named “Juliet Appleton.” This narrative subject does not match the novel's signed author, “Olive Pratt Rayner.” So we are again left with questions: what kind of narrative is this, who is the real subject of this story, what is the form of this narrative, and does our narrator find employment?

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 229 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Allen, Grant. “Falling in Love.” 1886. Falling in Love, with Other Essays on More Exact Branches of Science. London: Smith, Elder, 1889. 1–17.Google Scholar
Allen, Grant. “The Girl of the Future.” Universal Review 7 (May 1890): 49–64. Microfilm Early British Periodical Series, reel 317 [Ball State U].Google Scholar
Allen, Grant. “Plain Words on the Woman Question.” Fortnightly Review 52 (October 1889): 448–58. Microfilm History of Women, reel 499, no. 3789.1 [U of Notre Dame].Google Scholar
Allen, Grant. The Woman Who Did. Ed. Ruddick, Nicholas. Peterborough: Broadview, 2004.Google Scholar
Allen, Grant. “Woman's Place in Nature.” Woman Who Did. Ed. Ruddick, Nicholas. Peterborough: Broadview, 2004. 167–68.Google Scholar
Allen, Grant. [as Olive Pratt Rayner] The Type-Writer Girl. Ed. Suranyi, Clarissa J.. Peterborough: Broadview, 2004.Google Scholar
Ardis, Anne. New Women, New Novels: Feminism and Early Modernism. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atchison, Heather. “Grant Allen, Spencer and Darwin.” Greenslade and Rodgers 55–64.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Ed. Arendt, Hannah. New York: Schocken Books, 1968. 217–42.Google Scholar
Cameron, S. Brooke. “Grant Allen's The Woman Who Did: Spencerian Individualism and Teaching New Women to Be Mothers.” English Literature in Transition 51.3 (Sept. 2008): 281–301.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann. “Technophilia: Technology, Representation, and the Feminine.” Body / Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science. Ed. Jacobus, Mary, Keller, Evelyn Fox, and Shuttleworth, Sally. New York: Routledge, 1990. 163–76.Google Scholar
Eakin, Paul John. How Our Lives Become Stories: Making Selves. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton, George. Keynotes. London: Elkin Matthews & John Lane, 1893.Google Scholar
Ernst, Sabine. “The Woman Who Did and ‘The Girl Who Didn't’: The Romance of Sexual Selection in Grant Allen and Ménie Muriel Dowie.” Greenslade and Rodgers 81–94.Google Scholar
Gagnier, Regenia. “The Law of Progress and the Ironies of Individualism in the Nineteenth Century.” New Literary History 31.2 (2000): 315–36. Web. 24 March 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenslade, William, and Rodgers, Terence. “Resituating Allen: Writing, Radicalism and Modernity.” Greenslade and Rodgers 1–22.Google Scholar
Greenslade, William, and Rodgers, Terence, eds. Grant Allen: Literature and Cultural Politics at the Fin de Siècle. Burlington: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Keep, Christopher. “Blinded by the Type: Gender and Information Technology at the Turn of the Century.” Nineteenth Century Contexts 23.1 (2001): 149–73. Web. 24 March 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keep, Christopher. “The Cultural Work of the Type-Writer Girl.” Victorian Studies 40.3 (1997): 401–26. Web. 24 March 2011.Google Scholar
Langland, Elizabeth. Nobody's Angels: Middle-Class Women and Domestic Ideology in Victorian Culture. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Ledger, Sally. The New Woman: Fiction and Feminism at the fin de siècle. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Lejeune, Philippe. On Autobiography. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1989.Google Scholar
Morton, Peter. “The Busiest Man in England”: Grant Allen and the Writing Trade, 1875–1900. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olwell, Victoria. “Typewriters and the Vote.” Signs 29.1 (2003): 55–83. Web. 24 March 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Leah. “Grant Allen's Impersonal Secretaries: Rereading The Type-Writer Girl.” Greenslade and Rodgers 129–42.Google Scholar
Randolph, Lyssa. “‘The Romance of Race’: Grant Allen's Science as Cultural Capital.” Greenslade and Rodgers 65–80.Google Scholar
Rayner, , Olive Pratt, see Grant Allen.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Olive. Woman and Labor. 7th ed.New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1911.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Ed. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. New York: Oxford UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Sidonie, and Watson, Julia. Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2001.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. Principles of Sociology. London: Williams and Norgate, 1876.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. “The Social Organism.” Essays: Scientific, Political, & Speculative. Vol. 1. London: Williams and Norgate, 1873.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. Social Statistics: or, the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of them Developed. London: John Chapman, 1851.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert, et al. Descriptive Sociology; Or, Groups of Sociological Facts. London: Williams and Norgate, 1873. 265–307.Google Scholar
Suranyi, Clarissa J. Introduction, The Type-writer Girl. Peterborough: Broadview, 2004. 9–17.Google Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank. Dynamic Sociology: or Applied Social Science as Based Upon Statical Sociology and the Less Complex Sciences. New York: D. Appleton, 1883.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G.Ann Veronica. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1909.Google Scholar
Wicke, Jennifer. “Vampiric Typewriting: Dracula and Its Media.” ELH 59.2 (Summer 1992): 467–93. Web. 24 March 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar