Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:28:23.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representations of Melodramatic Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Daniel Gerould
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the reformers advocating a people's theater in the early twentieth century, there were those theorists of culture for the masses, like Romain Rolland and Anatolii Lunacharsky, who realized that to appeal to a broad audience a genuinely popular theatre must not only be uplifting and civic in spirit, but also entertaining. They recognized that such a popular theater already existed in the nineteenth century in the form of melodramatic performance: it had democratized the stage, brought the lower classes into the theatre, reduced the gap between the actor and the auditorium, and enabled the spectator to enter into the action, thereby creating a sense of communion (Bradby and McCormick 15–29). Rather than proposing a return to the sacred rituals of Greece or the religious festivals of the Middle Ages as the basis of a people's theater, they argued that melodramatic performance—purified of its commercialism and crudity—offered the model for a revolutionary new popular art.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 18 , Spring 1990 , pp. 55 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Allevy, Marie–Antoinette. La Mise en scène en France dans la première moitié du 19me siècle. Paris: E. Droz, 1938.Google Scholar
Altick, Richard D.The Shows of London. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Stanley. Scenes from the Nineteenth-Century Stage in Advertising Woodcuts. New York: Dover, 1977.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. O.British Plays of the Nineteenth Century. New York: Odyssey, 1966.Google Scholar
Béhar, Henri. Etude sur le théâtre dada et surréaliste. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.Google Scholar
Bentley, Eric. “Melodrama.” The Life of the Drama. New York: Atheneum, 1964, 195–218.Google Scholar
Boucicault, Dion[ysius]. “Leaves from a Dramatist's Diary.” The North American Review 149 (08 1889): 228–36.Google Scholar
Bradby, David, and McCormick, John. People's Theatre. London: Croom Helm, 1978. 15–29.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, Melodrama, and the Mode of Excess. New Haven: Yale UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Browne, Junius Henri. The Great Metropolis: A Mirror of New York (1869). Rpt. New York: Arno, 1975.Google Scholar
Crane, Stephen. Bowery Tales. Charlottesville: Virginia, 1969.Google Scholar
Davies, Robertson. “Playwrights and Plays.” The Revels History of Drama in English. Ed. Leech, Clifford and Craik, T. W.. 8 vols. London: Methuen, 1975. 6: 145–269.Google Scholar
Dreiser, Theodore. A Book about Myself. New York: Fawcett, 1965.Google Scholar
Dreiser, Theodore. Sister Carrie. New York: Penguin, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Nouty, Hassan. Théâtre et Pré-Cinéma: Essai sur la problématique de spectacle au XIXe siècle. Paris: A.-G. Nizet, 1978.Google Scholar
Ernst, Max. Une Semaine de Bonté: A Surrealistic Novel in Collage. New York: Dover, 1976.Google Scholar
Gerould, Daniel. “Gorky, Melodrama, and the Development of Early Soviet Theatre.” yale/theatre 7.2 (1976): 33–44.Google Scholar
Gerould, Daniel. “Russian Formalist Theories of Melodrama.” Journal of American Culture 1.1 (1978): 152–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, Robert Bechtold. Tragedy and Melodrama, Versions of Experience. Seattle: U Washington P, 1968.Google Scholar
Jennings, John J.Theatrical and Circus Life. St. Louis: Herbert & Cole, 1882.Google Scholar
Lunacharsky, A. V.Sobraniye sochinenii. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura, 1964.Google Scholar
McCabe, James D.Lights and Shadows of New York Life (1872). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1970.Google Scholar
Martin, Edward Winslow (pseudonym for James D. McCabe). The Secrets of the Great City. Philadelphia: Jones, Brothers and Co., 1869.Google Scholar
Meisel, Martin. Realizations: Narrative, Pictorial, and Theatrical Arts in Nineteenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Mickiewicz, Adam. “Les Slaves; cours professés au collège de France.” Paris: Au Comptoir, 1849.Google Scholar
Nodier, Charles. “Notice sur le Chien de Montargis ou la forêt de Bondy.” Théâtre Choisi. By René Charles Guilbert de Pixérécourt. Ed. Nodier, Charles. Paris and Nancy: Tresse, 1841–43.Google Scholar
Norris, Margot. Beasts of the Modern Imagination: Darwin, Nietzsche, Kafka, Ernst, & Lawrence. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radrizzani, René. “Roussel, Discoverer of New Worlds.” Le Macchine Celibi/The Bachelor Machines. New York: Rizzoli, 1975.Google Scholar
Rolland, Romain. “Quelques genres de théâtre populaire: —Le melodrama.” Le Théâtre du Peuple: Essai d'esthétique d'un théâtre nouveau. Paris: Albin Michel, 1913.Google Scholar
Roussel, Raymond. Impressions of Africa. Trans. Foord, Lindy and Heppenstall, Rayner. Berkeley, CA: U of California P, 1967.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Paul. Penny Theatres of Victorian London. London: Dennis Dobson, 1981.Google Scholar
Smith, Matthew Hale. Sunshine and Shadows in New York. Hartford: J. B. Burr, 1868.Google Scholar
Still, Bayard. Mirror for Gotham: New York as seen by Contemporaries from Dutch Days to the Present. New York: University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Sypher, Wylie. “Aesthetic of Revolution: The Marxist Melodrama.” Kenyon Review 10 (1948): 431–4. Rpt. in Tragedy: Vision and Form. Ed. Robert Corrigan. New York: Harper and Row, 1981.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Judith. A Human Comedy: Physiognomy and Caricature in Nineteenth-Century Paris. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1982.Google Scholar
Wilson, Forrest. Crusader in Crinoline: The Life of Harriet Beecher Stowe. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1941.Google Scholar