Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:24:00.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE PLAY WITH A PAST: ARTHUR WING PINERO'S NEW DRAMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Heather Anne Wozniak
Heather Anne Wozniak*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the late Victorian period, when writers, critics, and actors of the English theatre became obsessed with defining a decidedly New Drama – with establishing its history, directing its progress forward, and creating a literary drama – the majority of the plays produced focused upon forms of femininity. Strangely, these innovative dramas engaged not with the future, but with an all-too-familiar stock character: the woman with a past. This well-known type was “a lady whose previous conduct, rightly or wrongly, disqualified her from any position of rank or respect” (Rowell 108–09). Familiar examples of such plays include George Bernard Shaw's Mrs. Warren's Profession (1893) and Oscar Wilde's Lady Windermere's Fan (1892); lesser-known ones include Henry Arthur Jones's Case of Rebellious Susan (1894) and two plays that form the focus of this essay, Arthur Wing Pinero's The Second Mrs. Tanqueray (1893) and The Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith (1895). Several English theatre historians (including Richard Dietrich and Jean Chothia) present these plays as the basis of modern intellectual drama, yet none explains the paradox that the theatre of modernity is founded upon the woman with a past, a figure whose future in these plays is foreclosed or ambivalently conceptualized at best.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , September 2009 , pp. 391 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Anderson, Amanda. Tainted Souls and Painted Faces: The Rhetoric of Fallenness in Victorian Culture. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Archer, Charles. William Archer: Life, Work, and Friendships. New Haven: Yale UP, 1931.Google Scholar
Archer, William. About the Theatre: Essays and Studies. London: T Fisher Unwin, 1886.Google Scholar
Archer, William. “The Drama in the Doldrums.” Fortnightly Review 52, New Series. Ed. Harris, Frank. London: Chapman and Hall, 1892. 146–67.Google Scholar
Archer, William. “The Free Stage and the New Drama.” Fortnightly Review 50, New Series. Ed. Harris, Frank. London: Chapman and Hall, 1891. 663–72.Google Scholar
Archer, William. Reviews of The Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith. The Theatrical “World” of 1895. London: Walter Scott, 1896. 75–96.Google Scholar
Archer, William. Reviews of The Second Mrs. Tanqueray. The Theatrical “World” for 1893. London: Walter Scott, 1894. 125–44.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Nina. “The Rise of the Fallen Woman.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 35 (1980): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Jerome Hamilton. The Victorian Temper: A Study in Literary Culture. (Reissue) Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1969.Google Scholar
Buckley, Jerome Hamilton. “The Victorian Temper Revisited.” New Literary History 1.1 (1969): 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chothia, Jean. English Drama of the Early Modern Period, 1890–1940. London: Longman, 1996.Google Scholar
Collins, Thomas J.Robert Browning's Moral-Aesthetic Theory, 1833–1855. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1967.Google Scholar
Coskren, Robert. “The Lord Chamberlain's Office and Stage Censorship in England.” Dictionary of Literary Biography 10. London: Gale, 1982. 245–55.Google Scholar
Dawick, John. Pinero: A Theatrical Life. Niwot: Colorado UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Richard F.British Drama 1890 to 1950: A Critical History. Boston: Twayne, 1989.Google Scholar
Elliott, John R. Jr. “‘Feeling Hot’: Victorian Drama and the Censors.” Victorian Newsletter 49 (1976): 5–9.Google Scholar
Fisher, Judith L. “The ‘Law of the Father’: Sexual Politics in the Plays of Henry Arthur Jones and Arthur Wing Pinero.” Essays in Literature 16.2 (1989): 203–23.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, Linda, and Gardner, Viv, eds. New Woman Plays. London: Methuen Drama, 1991.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Hamilton. Arthur Wing Pinero, Playwright: A Study. London: Greening, 1902.Google Scholar
Griffin, Penny. Arthur Wing Pinero and Henry Arthur Jones. New York: St. Martin's, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickx, Johan R. “Pinero's Court Farces: A Revaluation.” Modern Drama 26.1 (1983): 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Henry Arthur. The Renascence of the English Drama. 1895. Freeport: Books for Libraries Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Jordan, Ellen. “The Christening of the New Woman: May 1894.” Victorian Newsletter 63 (1983): 19–21.Google Scholar
Kalikoff, Beth. Murder and Moral Decay in Victorian Popular Literature. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred. Sacred Tears: Sentimentality in Victorian Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Joel H. “Mrs. Ebbsmith's Bible Burning: Page versus Stage.” Theatre Notebook 44.3 (1990): 99–101.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Joel H. “Pineroticism and the Problem Play: Mrs. Tanqueray, Mrs. Ebbsmith and ‘Mrs. Pat.’” British Theatre in the 1890s: Essays on Drama and the Stage. Ed. Foulkes, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. 38–58.Google Scholar
Lazenby, Walter. Arthur Wing Pinero. New York: Twayne, 1972.Google Scholar
Ledger, Sally. The New Woman: Fiction and Feminism at the Fin de Siècle. New York: St Martin's, 1997.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander. “Pinero: From Farce to Social Drama.” Modern Drama 17 (1974): 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Jan. The “New Drama” 1900–1914: Harley Granville Barker, John Galsworthy, St John Hankin, John Masefield. London: Macmillan, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Jan. “New Women in the New Drama.” New Theatre Quarterly 6 (1990): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moi, Toril. Henrik Ibsen and the Birth of Modernism: Art, Theater, Philosophy. Oxford UP, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, Jane. Illegitimate Theatre in London, 1770–1840. New York: Cambridge UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Pinero, Arthur Wing. The Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith. 1895. The New Woman and Other Emancipated Woman Plays. Ed. Chothia, Jean. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. 61–134.Google Scholar
Pinero, Arthur Wing. The Second Mrs. Tanqueray. 1893. Trelawny of the “Wells” and Other Plays. Ed. Bratton, J. S.. New York: Oxford UP, 1995. 141–212.Google Scholar
Postlewait, Thomas. Prophet of the New Drama: William Archer and the Ibsen Campaign. Westport: Greenwood, 1986.Google Scholar
Jane, Rendall, ed. Equal or Different: Women's Politics 1800–1914. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Angelique, Richardson, and Willis, Chris, eds. The New Woman in Fiction and in Fact: Fin-de-Siècle Feminisms. New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Ronning, Robert. “The Eccentric: The English Comic Farce of Sir Arthur Pinero.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 63 (1977): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowbotham, Judith, and Stevenson, Kim, eds. Criminal Conversations: Victorian Crimes, Social Panic, and Moral Outrage. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Rowell, George. The Victorian Theatre: A Survey. New York: Oxford UP, 1956.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans. The Dramatic Criticism of William Archer. Switzerland: Francke Verlag Bern, 1964.Google Scholar
[Sichel, Walter S.]. “The New Drama.” Quarterly Review 182 (1895): 399–428.Google Scholar
Simon, Elliott M. “Arthur Wing Pinero's The Second Mrs. Tanqueray: A Reappraisal.” Ball State University Forum 28.1 (1987): 44–56.Google Scholar
Sterner, Mark H. “The Changing Status of Women in Late-Victorian Drama.” Within the Dramatic Spectrum. Ed. Hartigan, Karelisa V.. New York: UP of America, 1986. 199–212.Google Scholar
Taylor, John Russell. The Rise and Fall of the Well-Made Play. New York: Hill and Wang, 1967.Google Scholar
Tusan, Michelle Elizabeth. “Inventing the New Woman: Print Culture and Identity Politics During the Fin-de-Siecle.” Victorian Periodicals Review 31.2 (1998): 169–83.Google Scholar
Whitebrook, Peter. William Archer: A Biography. London: Methuen, 1993.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Homer. “William Archer: Prophet of Modern Drama.” Sewanee Review 44 (1936): 207–21.Google Scholar