Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T05:58:14.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE LATE-VICTORIAN HISTORIES OF INDIAN ART OBJECTS: POLITICS AND AESTHETICS IN JAIPUR'S ALBERT HALL MUSEUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2013

Tina Young Choi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent guidebooks for the Westerner traveling to Northern India generally refer the prospective visitor to a common range of cities around Delhi – Agra, Jaipur, and Udaipur; within these, the Taj Mahal, Jaipur's Pink City and nearby Amber Fort, and Udaipur's glamorous lake palaces usually merit must-see status. Until its refurbishment a few years ago, the Albert Hall Museum, an elaborate structure with old-fashioned interiors and a location a kilometer south of Jaipur's city center, ranked as a second- or even third-tier tourist attraction; travel guides from recent years mention it with indifference, describing its collections as “dusty” and “fine, if carelessly exhibited” (Bindloss and Singh 170), or even suggesting that “a slow circular turn around the building in a car will suffice” (Frommers 520). Yet a century ago the Museum proudly occupied a primary place in British travel guides to India. It opened with ceremony and fanfare in 1887, and by 1898 almost three million Indian and over ten thousand European visitors had passed through its doors (Hendley, Report 9). A striking example of colonial architecture, constructed of white stone with numerous courtyards, covered walkways, and ornamented domes (Figure 1), it was regarded as perhaps the most noteworthy edifice within a noteworthy Indian city. Thomas Holbein Hendley, resident Surgeon-Major in Jaipur, chief curator for the 1883 Jaipur Exhibition, and the Albert Hall Museum's Secretary and tireless champion, recommended that travelers in Jaipur for a single day make two visits, both morning and evening, to the site, and that those with an additional day to spend in the city schedule a third visit. Murray's Handbook for Travellers in India, Burma and Ceylon concurred, describing it as “a beautiful museum – an Oriental South Kensington, suitably housed” (174), and just after the turn of the century, English journalist Sidney Low recalled that it was “the best museum, with one exception, in all India, a museum which, in the careful selection and the judicious arrangement of its contents, is a model of what such an institution ought to be” (114).

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 199 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Bayly, C. A. “The Origins of Swadeshi (Home Industry): Cloth and Indian Society, 1700–1930.” The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Ed. Appadurai, Arjun. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. 285–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beg, Mirza Amir. The Guide to Lucknow: Containing Popular Places and Buildings Worthy of a Visit, with Historical Notes on Mutiny of 1857. Lucknow, 1915.Google Scholar
Bhattacharrya, Amit. “Swadeshi Enterprise in Colonial Bengal: Some Observations.” Contesting Colonialism: Partition and Swadeshi Re-Visited. Ed. Sengupta, Tapati and Roy, Shreela. Delhi: Macmillan India, 2007. 111–23.Google Scholar
Bindloss, Joe, and Singh, Sarina. Lonely Planet India. Oakland: Lonely Planet, 2007.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George. Handbook to the British Indian Section, Paris Universal Exhibition of 1878. London: Offices of the Royal Commission, 1878.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George. Industrial Arts of India. London: Chapman & Hall, 1880.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George. “Introductory Note.” Catalogue of a Loan Exhibition of Embroidery By Indian Women, at Chesham House, 142, Regent St., W. 1893. London: F. Calder Turner, 1893.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George. Two Letters on the Industrial Arts of India. London: W. B. Whittingham & Co, 1879.Google Scholar
Brantlinger, Patrick. “A Postindustrial Prelude to Postcolonialism: John Ruskin, William Morris, and Gandhism.” Critical Inquiry. 22 (1996): 466–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckenridge, Carol. “The Aesthetics and Politics of Colonial Collecting: India at World Fairs.” Comparative Studies in Society and History. 31 (1989): 195–216. JSTOR. Web. 14 Oct. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, E. C.Preface. Journal of Indian Art 1.1 (1886): i–ii.Google Scholar
Chanpawat, Thakoor Futeh Singh. A Brief History of Jeypore. Agra: Moon, 1899.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Crane, Walter. India Impressions With Some Notes of Ceylon During a Winter Tour, 1906–7. London: Methuen, 1907.Google Scholar
Driver, Felix, and Ashmore, Sonia. “The Mobile Museum: Collecting and Circulating Indian Textiles in Victorian Britain.” Victorian Studies 52 (2010): 353–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago: Chicago UP, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frommer's India. Hoboken: Wiley, 2010.Google Scholar
Garrick, H. B. W.Report of a Tour in the Panjâb and Râjpûtâna in 1883–84. Calcutta, 1887.Google Scholar
Hamack and Boyce. Indian Mirror [Calcutta, India] 4 Dec. 1889: 1. Microfilm.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas H. Handbook to the Jeypore Museum. Calcutta: Calcutta Central, 1895.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas H. The Jeypore Guide. Jeypore: Raj, 1876.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas H. London Indo-Colonial Exhibition of 1886. Calcutta: Calcutta Central, 1886.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas H. Notes on Jeypore for the Guidance of Visitors. Ajmere, 1899.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas H. The Rajputs and the History of Rajputana. London, 1905.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas H. Report on the Jeypore Museum. 1888–1898. Calcutta: Caledonian Steam Printing Works, 1898.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas H. The Rulers of India and the Chiefs of Rajputana, 1550–1897. London: W. Griggs, 1897.Google Scholar
Hoffenberg, Peter. An Empire on Display: English, Indian, and Australian Exhibitions from the Crystal Palace to the Great War. Berkeley: U of California P, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Jeypore Exhibition.” Times 28 May 1885: 13. Gale Cengage The Times Digital Archive. Web. 16 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Lara. Grand Designs: Labor, Empire, and the Museum in Victorian Culture. Durham, Duke UP, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriegel, Lara. “Narrating the Subcontinent in 1851: India at the Crystal Palace.” The Great Exhibition of 1851: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Ed. Purbrick, Louise. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2001. 146–78.Google Scholar
Low, Sidney. A Vision of India. London: Smith, Elder, 1911.Google Scholar
Mathur, Saloni. India By Design: Colonial History and Cultural Display. Berkeley: U of California P, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Barbara, and Metcalf, Thomas. A Concise History of India. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas. Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas. An Imperial Vision: Indian Architecture and Britain's Raj. Berkeley: U of California P, 1989.Google Scholar
Mitter, Partha. Art and Nationalism in Colonial India: Occidental Orientations. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Mullick Nephew & Co. Indian Mirror [Calcutta, India] 4 Dec. 1889: 1. Microfilm.Google Scholar
Murray, John. A Handbook for Travellers in India, Burma and Ceylon. 9th ed. London: John Murray, Albemarle St, 1913.Google Scholar
Murray, John. The Rajputana Gazetteer. Calcutta, Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing, 1879.Google Scholar
Richards, Thomas. The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire. London: Verso, 1993.Google Scholar
Rivett-Carnac, J. H.Many Memories of Life in India, At Home and Abroad. 1910. New York: Hesperides, 2006.Google Scholar
Rivett-Carnac, [Marion]. “An Afternoon's Ramble in an Indian Bazaar.” Journal of Indian Art 1.3 (1886): 6–8.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Stones of Venice. Vol. 2. Boston: Dana Estes, 1900.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Two Paths: Being Lectures on Art, and Its Application to Decoration and Manufacture, Delivered in 1858–9. Sunnyside, Kent: George Allen, 1878.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sumit. The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal, 1903–1908. New Delhi: People's Publishing House, 1973.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jonah. The Haunted Museum: Longing, Travel, and the Art-Romance Tradition. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarapor, Marukh. “John Lockwood Kipling and British Art Education in India.” Victorian Studies 24 (1980): 53–81. JSTOR. Web. 15 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
Tillotson, Giles. “The Jaipur Exhibition of 1883.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Series 3. 14 (2004): 111–26. JSTOR. Web. 20 Feb. 2008.Google Scholar
Trivedi, Lisa. Clothing Gandhi's Nation: Homespun and Modern India. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Young, Paul. “Mission Impossible: Globalization and the Great Exhibition.” Britain, the Empire, and the World at the Great Exhibition of 1851. Ed. Auerbach, Jeffrey and Hoffenberg, Peter. Aldershot, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008. 3–25.Google Scholar