Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T20:32:20.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Criminal Body in Victorian Britain: The Case of The Ring and the Book

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Extract

“For the choice of subject we have nothing but condemnation. It is Mr Browning's luck” (Litzinger 331). Thus the reviewer for Chamber's Journal in 1869 summed up his reaction to the subject matter of Browning's The Ring and the Book. Indeed, this account of Browning's subject has seemed satisfactory to all but the biographically inclined of Browning's critics. Browning's subject—a grisly murder and its attendant trials—can easily enough be explained by reference to his account of discovering his historical sources in Book 1 of The Ring and the Book or by a general discussion of Browning's personal propensity for the criminal or the bizarre. I wish to argue here, however, that Browning's subject was not merely his “luck.” Rather it went to the heart of social concerns and fictional practices in England in the 1860s. I propose, not to offer an exhaustive new reading of the poem, but to show how we can see The Ring and the Book as embedded in Victorian responses to the criminal body. A focus on the body and crime can provide us with a significant new understanding of Browning's poem even as it offers us a new way to view that poem's connections to Victorian culture and to our own.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITE

Altick, Richard. The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public 1800–1900. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1957.Google Scholar
Altick, Richard. Victorian Studies in Scarlet. New York: W. W. Norton, 1970.Google Scholar
Baldrick, Chris. In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. New York: Clarendon, P, Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Beales, Derek. From Castlereagh to Gladstone, 1815–1885. New York: W. W. Norton, 1969.Google Scholar
Brady, Ann P.Pompilia: A Feminist Reading of Robert Browning's “The Ring and the Book.” Athens: Ohio UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert. The Ring and the Book. Edited by Altick, Richard. New Haven: Yale UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, and Wedgwood, Julia. Robert Browning and Julia Wedgwood: A Broken Friendship as Revealed by Their Letters. Edited by Curie, Richard. New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1937.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. The Woman in White. New York: Century, 1907.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1979.Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick. “On the Line: Between History and Criticism.” Profession 89 (1989): 49.Google Scholar
Lansbury, Coral. The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1985.Google Scholar
Litzinger, Boyd, and Smalley, Donald, eds. Browning: The Critical Heritage. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1970.Google Scholar
Lonoff, Sue. “Multiple Narratives and Relative Truths: A Study of The Ring and the Book, The Woman in White, and The Moonstone.” Browning Institute Studies 10 (1982): 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElderry, Bruce R. Jr., “Browning and the Victorian Public in 1868‐69.” Research Studies of the State College of Washington 5 (1937): 193203.Google Scholar
McElderry, Bruce R. Jr., “Victorian Evaluation of The Ring and the Book.” Research Studies of the State College of Washington 7 (1939): 7589.Google Scholar
Miller, D. A.The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Signs Taken for Wonders: Essays in the Sociology of Literary Forms. Translated by Fischer, Susan, Forgacs, David, and Miller, David. London: Verso Editions and NLB, 1983.Google Scholar
Morley, John. Review of The Ring and the Book. The Fortnightly (March 1, 1869): 331–43. Rev. of The Ring and the Book. The British Quarterly Review 49 (1869): 435–59.Google Scholar
Page, Norman, ed. Wilkie Collins: The Critical Heritage. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
Richardson, Ruth. Death, Dissection, and the Destitute. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987.Google Scholar
Shaw, W. David. The Lucid Veil: Poetic Truth in the Victorian Age. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1987.Google Scholar
Twitchell, James B.Preposterous Violence: Fables of Aggression in Modern Culture. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Tobias, J. J.Nineteenth-Century Crime: in England: Prevention and Punishment. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1972.Google Scholar