Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:58:56.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics as Theatre: Metaphors of the Stage in German History, 1848–1933

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

David Blackbourn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

ALL the world's a stage, as we know, and the concept of a theatrum mundi is a venerable one. So too is the specific idea of politics as theatre. As an idea it may not seem very remarkable. Politics lives off metaphor, after all, and theatrical metaphor might seem especially appropriate to describe political activity. Do we not refer naturally to the political stage, to politicians assuming roles, to dramatic political scenes? This very naturalness, derived from repeated usage, presents a challenge. For one of the tasks of the historian is to show how what has come to seem natural came to seem so: to restore the novelty of artefacts and institutions we take for granted, to recover the impact of ideas and metaphors worn smooth by repetition. I want to argue below that metaphors of politics as theatre can be more than just a figure of speech: that they had specific and revealing meanings in the period of German history from the revolutions of 1848 to the advent of National Socialism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 37 , December 1987 , pp. 149 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sennett, R., The Fall of Public Man (Cambridge, 1974), 227–31, 236–7Google Scholar. Fortescue, W., Alphonse de Lamartine (1983)Google Scholar has details on Lamartine's friendship with Liszt.

2 Tocqueville, A. de, Recollections (New York, 1970), 53Google Scholar.

3 There is an outstanding discussion of this theme in Prawer, S. S., Karl Marx and World Literature (Oxford, 1976)Google Scholar, where the passage from The Class Struggles in France is also quoted (p. 167). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon (1852) is the other contemporary work of Marx where theatrical metaphors are widely used.

4 Brazill, W.J., ‘Georg Herwegh and the Aesthetics of German Unification’, Central European History, V (1972), 99–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Kaeber, E., Berlin 1848 (Berlin, 1948), 28Google Scholar.

6 Engels, F., Germany: Revolution and Counter-Revolution, in The German Revolutions, ed. Krieger, L. (Chicago, 1967), 169, 205–14, 235Google Scholar.

7 ‘This approach is well represented by the ‘dean of German historians’, Ritter, Gerhard, who died in 1967Google Scholar. It can also be seen in the influential American historian, Hayes, CarltonJ.. For a recent example, see Noel O'Sullivan's Fascism (1983)Google Scholar.

8 See the quotation from Adorno and Horkheimer that concludes this essay, and more generally the writers on Bonapartism mentioned below. There are interesting pointers in the same direction in SirNamier's, Lewis essay on Napoleon III, 'The First Mountebank Dictator, in Vanished Supremacies (1958)Google Scholar.

9 In The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon (footnote 3).

10 See, especially, the works of Hans-Ulrich Wehler: Bismarck und der Imperialismus (Cologne and Berlin, 1969)Google Scholar, and The German Empire 1871–1918 (Leamington Spa, 1985)Google Scholar.

11 ‘On the new cult of Sedanstag and its operation in Bavaria, see Blessing, W., Staat und Kirche in der Gesellschaft (Gottingen, 1982), 181, 190–1, 198, 236CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Sturmer, M., Regierung und Reichstag im Bismarckslaat 1871–1880: Casarismus oder Parlamentarismus (Diisseldorf, 1974), 128–33Google Scholar.

13 Critics of the Bonapartist concept as applied to Bismarck made a wide range of points that cannot be dealt with here. The critics include Lothar Gall, ‘Bismarck und der Bonapartismus’, Historische Zeitschrift, 223 (1976), 618–37Google Scholar, and Mitchell, A., ‘Bonapartism as a Model of Bismarckian Politics’, Journal of Modern History, 49 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This issue of the JMH also includes comments by O. Pflanze, C. Fohlen and M. Stürmer. See, most recently, Pflanze, O. ‘Bismarcks Herrschaftstechnik als Problem der gegenwärtigen Historiographie’, Historische Zeitschrift, 234 (1982), 562–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Griinthal, G., Parlamentarismus in Preuien 1848/49–1857/58 (Diisseldorf, 1982), 261–95Google Scholar; Stiirmer, , Regierung und Reichstag, 89,96 ffGoogle Scholar; Gollwitzer, H., ‘Der Casarismus Napoleons III. im Widerhall der offentlichen Meinung Deutschlands’, Historische zeitsckrift, 173 (1952), 23–75Google Scholar.

15 On the major exchange of letters between the two men in 1857, see the works cited in footnote 14, and Gall, L., Bismarck: Der weifie Revolutionar (Frankfurt/M, Berlin and Vienna, 1980), 173–84Google Scholar.

16 Dill, R. W., Der Parlamentarier Eduard Lasker und die parlamentarische Stilentwicklung der Jahre 1867–1884, Dissertation (Erlangen, 1958), 64–5Google Scholar.

17 Steinberg, J., Yesterday's Deterrent. Tirpitz and the Birth of the German Battle Fleet (1965), 167–8Google Scholar.

18 Berghahn, V. R., Der Tirpitz-Plan. Genesis und Verfall einer innenpolitischen Krisenstrategie unter Wilhelm II (Düsseldorf, 1971)Google Scholar; idem, Germany and the Approach of War in igi4 (1973); Deist, W., Flottenpolitik und Flottenpropaganda. Das Nachrichtenbureau des Reichsmarineamtes 1897–1914 (Stuttgart, 1976)Google Scholar.

19 On this subject generally, see Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T., eds., The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, 1983)Google Scholar, esp. chs. 1 and 7 by Hobsbawm. On Germany specifically, there are very valuable pointers in Nipperdey, T., ‘Nationalidee und Nationaldenkmal in Deutschland in 19. Jahrhundert’, in Nipperdey, , Gesellschaft, Kultur, Theorie (Gottingen, 1976), 133–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Fehrenbach, E., Wandlungen des Kaisergedankens 1871–1918 (Munich and Vienna, 1969)Google Scholar.

20 H.-G. Zmarzlik, in his review of the German edition of Wehler's, Hans-UlrichThe German Empire, ‘Das Kaiserreich in neuer Sicht?’, Historische zeilschrifl, 222 (1976), 105–26Google Scholar.

21 It is worth noting in passing, that the high price of bread in Imperial Germany also points to a divergence from the classic Bonapartist model. Hitler, to whose regime the model has also been applied, was—by contrast—always very concerned to try and keep down the cost of living for reasons of social stability.

22 Details in Blackbourn, D., Populists and Patricians (London, 1987), chs. 5, 6Google Scholar.

23 a, Kaiser Wilhelm II (1926), 277Google Scholar.

24 Mommsen, W.J., Max Weber and German Politics (Chicago, 1985), 144, 154Google Scholar.

25 ClaB, H., Fuhrergedanken, Aus Reden und Schriften von Justizrat Cla; 1903–1913 (Berlin, n.d.), 6Google Scholar.

26 On Viviani, see T. Zeldin, France 1848–1945, vol. 1; Ambition, Love and Politics (Oxford, 1973), 760Google Scholar.

27 A writer in the Alldeutsche Blatter, cited in Chickering, Roger, We Men Who Feel Most German. A Cultural Study of the Pan-German League 1886–1914 (1984), 123Google Scholar.

28 Ibid.

29 Krysiak, F., Hinter den Kulissen des Ostmarkenvereins: Aus den Geheimakten derpreussischen Nebenregierung fur die Polenausrottung (Posen, 1919)Google Scholar. On the Hakatisten themselves, see Galos, A., Gentzen, F.-H., Jacóbczyk, W., Die Hakatisten. Der Deutsche Ostmarkenverein (1894–1934) (Berlin, 1966)Google Scholar.

30 This change in the balance of parliamentary work in the Reichstag is noted in memoirs of the period. Information can also be found in Molt, P., Der Reichstag vor der improvisierten Revolution (Cologne and Opladen, 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and in the work of Rauh, Manfred: Foderalismus und Parlamentarismus im Wilhelminischen Reich (Dusseldorf, 1972)Google Scholar, and Die Parlamentarisierung des Deutschen Reiches (Dusseldorf, 1977)Google Scholar.

31 See Blackbourn, D., Class, Religion and Local Politics in Wilhelmine Germany (1980), esp. ch. 1Google Scholar.

32 Pfalzische Landesbibliothek Speyer, Ernst Lieber Papers, L. 39, Lieber to Posadowsky, to July 1894. For similar conspiratorial communications, see ibid, L. 36–38, Lieber to Posadowsky, 24june, 29june and 3July 1894.

33 See, now, the contributions to Rohl, J. C. G. and Sombart, N. (eds), Kaiser Wilhelm II: New Interpretations (Cambridge, 1982)Google Scholar, esp. those by Röhl himself, Paul Kennedy, Wilhelm Deist, Isabel Hull, Kathy Lerman and Terence Cole.

34 See Wehler, The German Empire, esp. 52–71.

33 Ibid, 63; Fritz Hartung quoted in Wilke, E.-T. P. W., Political Decadence in Imperial Germany, Personnel-Political Aspects of the German Government Crisis 1894–97 (Urbana/Illinois, 1976), 228Google Scholar.

36 See Blackbourn, D., ‘The Politics of Demagogy in Imperial Germany’, Past and Present, 113 (1986), 163–4, 167–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 See the contributions to e (ed), Organisierter Kapitalismus (Gottingen, 1974)Google Scholar, and for general discussion of these debates: Eley, G., ‘Capitalism and the Wilhelmine State: Industrial Growth and Political Backwardness in German Historiography, 1890–1918’, Historical Journal, 21 (1978), 737–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Nocken, U., ‘Corporatism and Pluralism in Modern German History’, in Stegmann, D., e, P.-C. Witt (eds), Industrielle Gesellschqft und Politisches System (Bonn, 1978), 37–56Google Scholar.

38 For an overview of the very large literature on this subject, see a, 7Parlament, Parteien und Interessenverbande 1890–1914’, in Sturmer, M. (ed), Das kaiserliche Deutschland. Polilik und Gesellschaft 1870–1918 (Diisseldorf, 1970), 340–77Google Scholar. The German literature is extensively drawn on in Kitchen, M., The Political Economy of Germany 1815–1914 (1978)Google Scholar.

39 Jaeger, H., Unternehmer in der deutschen Politik (1890–1913) (Bonn, 1967), 95Google Scholar.

40 Ibid, 97.

41 The left liberal Georg Gothein, an extremely dull speaker, was referred to by the political wags as ‘Gothë-in’, after a popular sleeping draft. See Einem, Karl von, Erinnerungen eines Sotdaten (Leipzig, 1933), 69Google Scholar.

42 The decline of businessmen in parliaments, both local and national, is detailed by Jaeger, , Unternehmer, 25–106Google Scholar. For a good analysis of a particular group and region, which comes to the same conclusion, seePierenkemper, T., Die westfalischen Schwerindustriellen 1852–1913 (Göttingen, 1979), 61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Eley, G., Reshaping the German Right (1980), 311Google Scholar, and for furthe r details on Strese mann, Warren, D., The Red Kingdom of Saxony, Lobbying Grounds for Gustav Stresemann 1901–1909 (The Hague, 1964)Google Scholar.

44 Cited in Gugel, M., Industrieller Aufstieg und burgerliche Herrschaft (Cologne, 1975), 171Google Scholar.

45 Owen, R., ‘Military-Industrial Relations: Krupp and the Imperial Navy Office’, in Evans, R.J., ed., Society and Politics in Wilhelmine Germany (1978), 71–89Google Scholar. On Krupp's role in the Kaiser's entourage, see Hull, I. V., The entourage of Kaiser Wilhelm II 1888–1918 (Cambridge, 1982), 146–74Google Scholar; and on the movement of government officials into large private concerns, Kocka, J., Die Angestellten in der deutschen Geschichte 1850–1980 (Gottingen, 1981), 80–1Google Scholar. This was something that engaged the interest of the Reichstag in 1912.

46 Bennigsen to Pastor Pfaff, 30 December 1873, cited in Oncken, H., Rudolf von Bennigsen, 2 vols. (Stuttgart and Leipzig, 1910), ii. 242–3Google Scholar.

47 Dill, Parlamenlarische Stilentwicklung.

48 Ibid., pp.45–6; Pastor, L., August Reichensperger, 2 vols. (Freiburg i. B., 1899), i. 424–6; ii. 179, 201Google Scholar.

49 Dill, , Parlamentarische Stilentwicklung, 14Google Scholar.

50 Herding, G. von, Erinnerungen aus meinem Leben, 2 vols. (Munich, 1919–1920), ii. 175–6Google Scholar.

51 Levy, R. S., The Downfall of the Anti-Semitic Political Parties in Imperial Germany (New Haven, Conn. 1975), 39Google Scholar; Wernecke, K., Der Wille zur Wellgeltung (Dusseldorf, 1970), 115Google Scholar.

52 Owen, , ‘Military-Industrial Relations’, 74 (emphasis in the original)Google Scholar.

53 On the SPD, see Hall, A., Scandal, Sensation and Social Democracy. The SPD Press in Wilhelmine Germany 1890–1914 (Cambridge, 1977)Google Scholar. On the other movements, see Blackbourn, , ‘The Politics of Demagogy’, 166–8Google Scholar.

54 On Ahlwardt, see Blackbourn, , 7The Politics of Demagogy’, 162 ffGoogle Scholar.

55 Gugel, , Industrieller Aufstieg, 184–8Google Scholar.

56 Pogge, H. a and Geiss, I., Die Erforderlichkeit des Unmoglichen (Frank-furt/M, 1965), 20Google Scholar.

57 Zucker, S., Ludwig Bamberger (Pittsburgh Pa, 1975), 86Google Scholar.

58 Wilke, , Political Decadence, 20Google Scholar.

59 Sloterdijk, P., Kritik der zynischen Vernunft, 2 vols. (Frankfurt/M, 1983), ii. 705Google Scholar.

60 O'Sullivan, Fascism, ch. 3.

61 Zeman, Z. A. B., Nazi Propaganda (Oxford, 1964), 8–Google Scholar.

62 Thus, as one convert put it: ‘On April 20 1932, in Kassel, for the first time I heard the Fiihrer Adolf Hitler speak in person. After this, there was only one thing for me, either to win with Adolf Hitler or to die for him. The personality of the Fiihrer had me totally in its spell’. Cited in Kershaw, I., ‘Ideology, Propaganda, and the Rise of the Nazi Party’, in Stachura, P. D., ed. The Nazi Machtergreifung (1983), 176Google Scholar. Kershaw provides an exemplary introduction to the subject.

63 Mosse, G. L., The Nationalization of the Masses. Political Symbolism and Mass Movements in Germany from the Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich (New York, 1975)Google Scholar.

64 Benjamin, Walter, Das Kunstwerk im zeitalter seiner techmschen Reproduzierbarkett (Frankfurt/M, 1963), 48, 51Google Scholar.

65 A good guide to the very large literature on this subject is Geary, D., ‘The Industrial Elite and the Nazis in the Weimar Republic’, in Stachura, (ed), Nazi Machtergreifung, 85–100Google Scholar.

66 Michael Geyer makes a good case for this reading of the Reichswehr, in ‘Études in Political History: Reichswehr, NSDAP, and the Seizure of Power’, in Stachura, , ed., Nazi Machtergreifung, 101–23Google Scholar.

67 Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M., Dialectic of Enlightenment (1979), 236–7 (first published 1944)Google Scholar.