Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T19:24:24.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THe Fear of Falling: British Politics and Imperial Decline Since 1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

J. G. Darwin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

TO an outsider historians must sometimes seem perversely obsessed with decline. Certainly when it comes to dealing with empires, his-torians betray a fascination with decay that is almost pathological—and often not simply with the nature and causes of decline but with the exact moment when it began—a somewhat futile enterprise if an enjoyable parlour game. Of course the appeal of decay to the his-torical imagination is not simply the outgrowth of contemporary nostalgia for lost worlds and past times. In the later nineteenth and earlier twentieth centuries the intellectual habit of ‘historical-mindedness’ and the particular tendency to search for a pattern of origins, growth, maturity, decline and fall were extremely influential over a wide range of intellectual disciplines and we might suppose helped to shape the world-view of those who managed the external affairs of Britain and the other powers. The search for historical laws of civilisation and decay was a characteristically Victorian intellectual preoccupation and an essential part of the way in which Europeans tried to make sense of the other civilisations into which they crashed during the nineteenth century. But how far were the leaders of the European imperial states and the circles of informed opinion in which they moved willing to turn on their own empires the analysis of growth and decay they had fashioned for the states and cultures they had overthrown? To what extent should we see the makers of British policy in the first half of this century as (in Gibbon's famous phrase) ‘musing in the ruins of the Capitol’? Was the Marquess of Lothian's remark that ‘sooner or later empires decay partly because they become rigid and rotten at the centre…’ a recognition that if history was the graveyard of empires, British imperialism had certainly reached retiring age? Or did Lothian and others like him assume that Britain's peculiarities made her exempt from such generalizations?

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 36 , December 1986 , pp. 27 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the remarks in Becker, C. L., The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth Century Philosophers (New Haven, 1932Google Scholar; reissued 1959), ch. 1.

2 Burrow, J. W., Evolution and Society (Cambridge, 1966)Google Scholar.

3 Marquess, of Lothian, , Pacifism is not Enough (Oxford, 1935) 48Google Scholar.

4 Mackinder, H., Britain and the British Seas (1902)Google Scholar, quoted in Parker, W. H., Mack-inder: Geography as an aid to Statecraft (Oxford, 1982), 61Google Scholar.

5 See Selborne to Curzon, 21 Oct. 1903, in Kennedy, P., The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism (1980), 307Google Scholar.

6 Ibid.

7 Webb, S., The Decline of the Birthrate (1907)Google Scholar, quoted in Semmel, B., Imperialism and Social Reform (1960), 51Google Scholar.

8 Amery, J., Joseph Chamberlain and the Tariff Reform Campaign (1969), 192Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., 472.

10 Ibid., 538.

11 Austen Chamberlain to his wife, 7 Jan. 1913, in Chamberlain, A., Politics from Inside (1936), 508Google Scholar.

12 Kennedy, 371, 585.

13 Gollin, A., Proconsulin Politics (1964), 187Google Scholar.

14 Speech at Nottingham, 19 Apr. 1909, reprinted in Lord Milner, The Motion and the Empire (1913), 365.

15 For Curzon's views, Curzon to Northbrook, 12 Aug. 1903, in Ronaldshay, Lord, The Life of Lord Curzon, iii (1929), 24Google Scholar. For Cromer, see Marquess, of Zetland, , Lord Cromer (1932), 327Google Scholar.

16 Sykes, A., Tariff Reform in British Politics 1903–1913 (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar, esp. ch. 10.

17 See for examples, Stoddard, L., The Rising Tide of Colour (1922)Google Scholar; Carthill, A., The Lost Dominion (Edinburgh-London, 1924)Google Scholar.

18 ‘Discontent in the Conservative party grew as a result of the Irish surrender’, recorded Page-Croft, a leading Die-Hard, ‘and gradually some sixty members of the party began to act with some measure of independence on this and other questions.’ Page-Croft, H., My Life of Strife (1949), 155Google Scholar.

19 Chamberlain to Curzon, 6 Nov. 1921, Curzon MSS, F 112/317, India Office Libr.

20 Petrie, C., The Life and Letters of Austen Chamberlain, ii (1940), 164Google Scholar.

21 George Younger to Bonar Law, 19 Nov. 1921, Bonar Law Papers 107/1/72, House of Lords Record Office.

22 Curzon to Milner, 3 Jan. 1920, Curzon MSS, F 112/208.

23 Bonar Law to J. P. Croal, 12 Nov. 1921, Bonar Law Papers 107/1/83.

24 For Conservative dissidence over India: Ramsden, J., The Age of Balfour and Baldwin (1978)Google Scholar; Cross, J. A., Sir Samuel Hoare (1977)Google Scholar; Peele, G., ‘Revolt over India’ in The Politics of Reappraisal, ed. Peele, G. and Cook, C. P. (1975)Google Scholar.

25 For the text of two of Churchill's broadcasts, \Gilbert, M., Winston Spencer Churchill: Companion, V, pt 2 (1981), 711–12, 1053 ffGoogle Scholar.

26 For an account of ministerial ruthlessness in this effort, Bridge, C., ‘Churchill, Hoare, Derby and the Committee of Privileges April–June 1934’, Historical Journal, XX (1979) 215–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Beaverbrook to J. L. Garvin, 2 Jan. 1932, Gilbert, v, pt. 2, 389.

28 Churchill reputedly used an earthier expression.

29 Hansard, , Commons Debates, 5th ser., 531, col. 743Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., cols. 781–2.

31 Goldsworthy, D., Colonial Issues in British Politics 1945–61 (1971), 300Google Scholar.

32 Macmillan, H., Pointing the Way (1972), 309Google Scholar.

33 For these arguments, Darwin, J., ‘Imperialism in decline? Tendencies in British imperial policy between the wars’, Historical Journal, xxiii (1980)Google Scholar; idem, ‘British decolonization since 1945: a pattern or a puzzle’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, xii (1984).

34 Milner to Lionel Curtis, 27 Nov. 1915, Milner Papers, Bodleian Library; partly quoted in Gollin, 314.

35 See Louis, W. R., Imperialism at Bay (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar.