Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T14:15:57.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Walter Burley, Quid sit subiectum scientiae naturalis: Eine Edition Von Quaestiones super Librum physicorum, q. 2, und von Expositio vetus cum quaestionibus super Librum physicorum, q. 1.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Mischa Von Perger*
Affiliation:
Neusäß (Schwaben)

Extract

Zu Aristoteles' Physik hat Walter Burley drei Kommentare verfasst: eine umfangreiche, selbständige Quästionenreihe und zwei Texterklärungen ad modum commenti mit eingestreuten Quästionen. Der erste Literalkommentar entstand vor 1316, der zweite in zwei Schüben 1324–27 (zu den Büchern 1–6) und 1334–37 (zu den Büchern 7 und 8). Die Quästionenreihe stammt nach der hier vorgeschlagenen Datierung aus der Zeit vor Abfassung des ersten Literalkommentars.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Diese Datierung beruht auf einem Indiz: In einer der beiden Abschriften des Werks, MS Cambridge, St John's College D 25, fol. 80v, steht am Rand die Jahreszahl 1316. Google Scholar

2 Siehe zu dieser Datierung Weisheipl, J. A., “Ockham and Some Mertonians,” Mediaeval Studies 30 (1968): 163213, hier 181–83.Google Scholar

3 Dieser Befund stammt von Wood, R., “Walter Burley's ‘Physics’ Commentaries,” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984): 275327, hier 292–93.Google Scholar

4 Dies hat A. Maier festgestellt: Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik (Rom, 1958), 52.Google Scholar

5 R. Wood datiert die Quästionenreihe in die Zeit zwischen den beiden Literalkommentaren, begründet dies aber nicht: “Walter Burley's ‘Physics’ Commentaries,” 283–87.Google Scholar

6 Für die anderen drei im frühen Kommentar behandelten Argumente finden sich folgende Entsprechungen: Expos. vet., § 2.1.1: Qq., § 2.2–4.2; Expos. vet., § 2.1.2: Qq., § 2.2–4.1; Expos. vet., § 2.1.4: Qq., § 2.1.2.Google Scholar

7 Zur Bestimmung des Gegenstands der Physik in der Schule von Johannes Duns Scotus, cf. Gensler, M., ed., “The Question on the Subject-Matter of Physics from ‘Quaestiones in VIII libros Physicorum’ Ascribed to Antonius Andreae,” Studia Mediewistyczne 32 (1997): 2346; idem, “Two ‘Quaestiones’ concerning the Subject Matter of Physics: An Early Scotist Interpretation of Aristotle,” Aristotle in Britain during the Middle Ages , ed. Marenbon, J. (Turnhout, 1996), 195–209.Google Scholar

8 Cf. Wood, , “Walter Burley's ‘Physics’ Commentaries,” 290–93.Google Scholar

9 Cf. ibid., 291; Zimmermann, A., Verzeichnis ungedruckter Kommentare zur Metaphysik und Physik des Aristoteles aus der Zeit von etwa 1250–1350 , 2 Bde. (Leiden, 1971), 1:226.Google Scholar

10 Das Verzeichnis der “tituli” ist in anderer Tinte geschrieben und gegenüber dem Text der Quästionen fehlerhaft, so dass es als nachträgliche Hinzufügung von zweifelhafter Authentizität gelten muss. Es ist bereits zweimal publiziert worden. Die Transkription von Wood, R. (“Walter Burley's ‘Physics’ Commentaries,” 312–17) ist gegenüber derjenigen von S. Harrison Thomson korrekter, enthält aber doch auch ein paar Fehler. Zu korrigieren sind (abgesehen von einigen Indikativ-Formen, die Wood stillschweigend in den Konjunktiv gesetzt hat) die folgenden Stellen: 313, no. 25: lies “casus” statt “causa”; 314, no. 54: ergänze “ad quern est motus'; 316, no. 80: lies “Quis motus cui motui est contrarius” statt “Quis motus <sit> cui motus est contrarius”; no. 98: lies “quo” statt “quod”; 317, no. 101: lies “quod omne, quod movetur, movetur ab alio, <sit bona>“ statt “quod omne quod movetur ab alio <movetur>….” Cf. Harrison Thomson, S., “Unnoticed Questiones of Walter Burley on the Physics,” Mitteilungen des Instituts für österreichische Geschichtsforschung 62 (1954): 390–405, hier 394–97. cui motus est contrarius”; no. 98: lies “quo” statt “quod”; 317, no. 101: lies “quod omne, quod movetur, movetur ab alio, “ statt “quod omne quod movetur ab alio ….” Cf. Harrison Thomson, S., “Unnoticed Questiones of Walter Burley on the Physics,” Mitteilungen des Instituts für österreichische Geschichtsforschung 62 (1954): 390–405, hier 394–97.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Das+Verzeichnis+der+“tituli”+ist+in+anderer+Tinte+geschrieben+und+gegenüber+dem+Text+der+Quästionen+fehlerhaft,+so+dass+es+als+nachträgliche+Hinzufügung+von+zweifelhafter+Authentizität+gelten+muss.+Es+ist+bereits+zweimal+publiziert+worden.+Die+Transkription+von+Wood,+R.+(“Walter+Burley's+‘Physics’+Commentaries,”+312–17)+ist+gegenüber+derjenigen+von+S.+Harrison+Thomson+korrekter,+enthält+aber+doch+auch+ein+paar+Fehler.+Zu+korrigieren+sind+(abgesehen+von+einigen+Indikativ-Formen,+die+Wood+stillschweigend+in+den+Konjunktiv+gesetzt+hat)+die+folgenden+Stellen:+313,+no.+25:+lies+“casus”+statt+“causa”;+314,+no.+54:+ergänze+“ad+quern+est+motus';+316,+no.+80:+lies+“Quis+motus+cui+motui+est+contrarius”+statt+“Quis+motus++cui+motus+est+contrarius”;+no.+98:+lies+“quo”+statt+“quod”;+317,+no.+101:+lies+“quod+omne,+quod+movetur,+movetur+ab+alio,+“+statt+“quod+omne+quod+movetur+ab+alio+….”+Cf.+Harrison+Thomson,+S.,+“Unnoticed+Questiones+of+Walter+Burley+on+the+Physics,”+Mitteilungen+des+Instituts+für+österreichische+Geschichtsforschung+62+(1954):+390–405,+hier+394–97.>Google Scholar

11 Von einer zweiten Abschrift des Werks ist nur ein Fragment aus Buch V erhalten: MS Cambridge, St John's College D 25, fol. 76r-85v. Google Scholar

1 scientiae] libri B Google Scholar

2 sciendum … multae] om. C Google Scholar

3 aliqui] tamen C Google Scholar

4 tractant] tradunt B Google Scholar

5 illud] istud B Google Scholar

6 corpus naturale] corpora naturalia fort. recte B (cf. infra, n. h) Google Scholar

7 passiones] esse add. C Google Scholar

8 ens … esse] quod ens mobile est B Google Scholar

9 ens … huius] sic B Google Scholar

10 ista] illa B Google Scholar

11 continetur] concipitur B Google Scholar

12 in metaphysica] metaphysicae B Google Scholar

13 tres] trias B Google Scholar

14 dicit] om. B Google Scholar

15 est subiectum] om. B Google Scholar

16 subiecta] substantia B Google Scholar

17 quae] qui C Google Scholar

18 quod] om. B Google Scholar

19 arguitur sic] om. C Google Scholar

20 unum] om. B Google Scholar

21 corporis] om. B Google Scholar

22 differentiam] scientiam B Google Scholar

23 aliquam] aliam BC Google Scholar

24 accidentalem] accidentale B Google Scholar

25 alicuius] huius B Google Scholar

26 earum] eius C Google Scholar

27 substantia] accidens B Google Scholar

28 istae] item C Google Scholar

29 subiecti … scientiae] istius subiecti B Google Scholar

30 dicat] dicit B Google Scholar

31 habuit … nominibus] de nominibus habuit hic B Google Scholar

32 corpora … quod] om. C Google Scholar

33 curavit] curat C Google Scholar

34 subiectum huius] om. C Google Scholar

35 ex] a B Google Scholar

36 respondere] om. C Google Scholar

37 sit] est B Google Scholar

38 sit] est B Google Scholar

39 conceditur] concedatur B Google Scholar

40 hic] haec C Google Scholar

41 bis] om. C Google Scholar

42 rationale] naturale B Google Scholar

43 vel] et B Google Scholar

44 rationale] naturale B Google Scholar

45 rationale] naturale B Google Scholar

46 est] om. B Google Scholar

47 una] prima B Google Scholar

48 Commentator] in add. B Google Scholar

49 dicit] concedit B Google Scholar

50 quia] quae C Google Scholar

51 non] iter. B Google Scholar

52 et] om. B Google Scholar

53 nisi] om. C Google Scholar

54 haec ille] om. B Google Scholar

55 hoc] hic B Google Scholar

56 huiusmodi] cuiusmodi B Google Scholar

57 quia] et B Google Scholar

58 non est semper] om. C Google Scholar

59 quadragesimo] sexagesimo B Google Scholar

60 aliqua] alia C Google Scholar

61 ad ea] alia B Google Scholar

62 aliqua] alia C Google Scholar

63 sensui nota] nota sensui B Google Scholar

64 quae … opiniones] contra alias tres opiniones quae probant C Google Scholar

65 huius] om. C Google Scholar

66 mobilis] sensibilis C Google Scholar

67 non sequitur] haec consequentia non valet B Google Scholar

68 aliquid est] aliquod est C est aliquid B Google Scholar

69 substantia] subiecto B Google Scholar

70 et accidente] om. C ac. Google Scholar

71 pro] propter C Google Scholar

72 est] om. B Google Scholar

73 et] om. B Google Scholar

74 esse] om. C Google Scholar

75 est] om. C Google Scholar

76 secundum] om. B Google Scholar

77 commento … decimo] om. C Google Scholar

78 dicit quod] sic dicit B Google Scholar

79 ut] quod B Google Scholar

80 haec ille] hoc ille B om. C Google Scholar

81 est] om. B Google Scholar

82 essentialis] essentiali C Google Scholar

83 scilicet] sicut B Google Scholar

84 est] om. B Google Scholar

85 est in naso] in naso essentialiter est C Google Scholar

86 et] om. B Google Scholar

87 accipiatur] accipitur B Google Scholar

88 sicut] sed C Google Scholar

89 simitatis] simi BC Google Scholar

90 idem] item BC Google Scholar

91 duodevicesimo] quarto decimo C Google Scholar

92 dicens] dicit C Google Scholar

93 accidentia … in] accidens est B Google Scholar

94 aut] vel B Google Scholar

95 aut] vel B Google Scholar

96 haec ille] om. B Google Scholar

97 non] om. B Google Scholar

98 dat differentiam] sic dicitur differentia B Google Scholar

99 hominem] et add. B Google Scholar

100 concavum] est add. B Google Scholar

101 unum] unus B Google Scholar

102 non … inseparabilis] est separabilis C Google Scholar

103 suas] duas BC Google Scholar

104 obiciatur … et] obicitur B Google Scholar

105 dicatur] dicitur C om. B Google Scholar

106 quinto] sexto BC Google Scholar

107 ens] esse B Google Scholar

108 album in homine] argentum homini B Google Scholar

109 aliud] aliquod C Google Scholar

110 ut] quod B Google Scholar

111 per] quia B Google Scholar

112 accidens] om. B Google Scholar

113 dicendum] om. B Google Scholar

114 de corpore] respectu corporis C Google Scholar

115 aut] vel B Google Scholar

116 potest probare] probare potest B Google Scholar

117 est] om. B Google Scholar

118 suae … supponit] considerationis suae considerat B Google Scholar

119 corpus] illegibile C Google Scholar

120 et] quod B Google Scholar

121 sit] est B Google Scholar

122 dicendum … naturale] illegibile C Google Scholar

123 significet] significetur B Google Scholar

124 essentiale ideo] illegibile C Google Scholar

125 per … ad] fol. mutil. C Google Scholar

126 secundam] secundum BC Google Scholar

127 concedatur] conceditur C Google Scholar

128 naturale] naturalis B Google Scholar

129 differentia] om. B Google Scholar

130 de numero] om. B Google Scholar

131 scientiae] dicerem tamen propter auctoritatem Avicennae primo Metaphysicae suae praeallegatam, quod corpus naturale sit subiectum huius B Google Scholar

132 alicui] aliter (?) B Google Scholar

133 aliquod] aliquid B Google Scholar

134 esset] sit B Google Scholar

135 inveniantur] inveniatur C Google Scholar

136 sint] om. B Google Scholar

137 re] om. C Google Scholar

138 oportet] oporteret B Google Scholar

139 res] om. B Google Scholar

140 dico] dicitur C Google Scholar

141 aliquo] alio B Google Scholar

142 prius pertransit] per prius transit B Google Scholar

143 propinquam] propinqua C Google Scholar

144 partem] om. B Google Scholar

145 multis] om. C Google Scholar

1 scientia] entia Ca ac. Google Scholar

2 aut] ante Ca Google Scholar

3 rerum naturalium] quae constituuntur Ca Google Scholar

4 tertio] octogesimo Ca Google Scholar

5 idem] istud Ca ac. Google Scholar

6 item] iterum Ca Google Scholar

7 quod] et Ca Google Scholar

8 omne habens] quae insunt Ca ac .Google Scholar

9 item] iterum Ca Google Scholar

10 diversorum] diversum Ca Google Scholar

11 mobili] immobili C Google Scholar

12 subalternata] subalternater Ca Google Scholar

13 subalternata] subalternater Ca Google Scholar

14 subalternata] subalternater Ca Google Scholar

15 physica] philosophia Ca Google Scholar

16 dicitur] dicere Ca Google Scholar

17 dicitur] dicere Ca Google Scholar

18 corpus] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

19 ly] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

20 dico] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

21 denotatur] denominatur Ca Google Scholar

22 subiectum] aggregatum add. Ca ac. Google Scholar

23 accidens] dicitur uno modo add. Ca ac. Google Scholar

24 quin] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

25 est] non praem. Ca ac. Google Scholar

26 contingenti] contingentia Ca Google Scholar

27 septimo] octavo BC Google Scholar

28 dicitur] iter. Ca ac. Google Scholar

29 distinguenda] quod add. Ca Google Scholar

30 mobile] immobile Ca Google Scholar

31 ly] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

32 verum] vera Ca Google Scholar

33 quod] add. supra lin. post istud Ca Google Scholar

34 nobis] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

35 aut quaedam] autem quidem Ca Google Scholar

36 tamen … mobilia] add. in marg. Ca pc. Google Scholar

37 quae] illegibile (verbum in rasura scriptum) Ca Google Scholar

38 subalternationem] alternationem Ca Google Scholar

39 subalternantis] alternantis Ca Google Scholar

40 quod] est add. Ca pc. Google Scholar

41 et] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

42 quod] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

43 hic] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

44 dicendo] dicendum Ca Google Scholar

45 mobile … subiectum] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

46 huiusmodi] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

47 non secundum] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

48 opinionem] dico add. Ca Google Scholar

49 naturalis] naturales Ca ac. Google Scholar

50 de] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

51 et] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

52 libri dicit] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

53 quod … naturalium] add. in marg. Ca Google Scholar

54 et quia … ideo] quia … et ideo BC Google Scholar

55 argumentum]. p. <= Philosophum > Ca ac. +Ca+ac.>Google Scholar

56 est] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

57 dico] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

58 dicit] quia add. Ca ac. Google Scholar

59 esse] est Ca Google Scholar

60 materia et] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

61 sunt subiectum] om. Ca ac. Google Scholar

62 idem] illud Ca ac. Google Scholar

63 aliqua] alia Ca Google Scholar

64 aliqua] alia Ca Google Scholar

65 aliqua] alia Ca Google Scholar

66 ista] istam Ca Google Scholar

67 aliqua] alia Ca Google Scholar