¹ See Kuttner, , Repertorium 308 for Palatina I, and ‘Johannes Teutonicus, das vierte Laterankonzil u. die Compilatio quarta,’ in Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati V (Studi e Testi 125; 1946) 622 for Pragensis. For my study of the collections I have used photostats and microfilms in the possession of the Institute of Research and Study in Medieval Canon Law by the kind arrangement of the Director.Google Scholar

² Lehmann, P. gave a brief account in ‘Mitteilungen aus Handschriften III,’ in Sb. Akad. München (1931–32), Heft 6 pp. 21–22, where the canonistic contents are described as ‘Compil. IV.’ (fols. 2^r-23^v) and ‘Formulae litterarum’ (fols. 23^v-45^r). Professor Kuttner provided a more accurate description of this section in Misc. Mercati 622 n.22.Google Scholar

³ 43–44 are brought under one title, 46 is divided into two. Google Scholar

⁴ Only no. 20 has a date, and that is garbled. See notes to concordance, below, p. 477. Google Scholar

⁵ See Kuttner, ‘Eine Dekretsumme des Johannes Teutonicus,’ ZRG Kanon. Abt. 21 (1932) 141–89; idem, Repertorium 81–92, where it is shown that although the glosses as a whole are not the work of Johannes, they owe much to him. This deserves to be remembered when the affinities of Pal. I with Comp. IV are considered, below.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶ See below, notes to concordance, Abrin. 33. Google Scholar

⁷ Singer, H., ‘Neue Beiträge …,’ Sb. Akad. Vienna 171 i (1913). For a partial description of the manuscript see pp. 74–80. Singer does not notice our brief collection.Google Scholar

⁸ Cf. Kuttner, , Repertorium 264.Google Scholar

⁹ Cf. ibid. 417–8; Traditio 1.299 n. 40; Kuttner, ‘Réflexions sur les brocards des glossateurs,’ Mélanges Joseph de Ghellinck, S.J. (Gembloux 1951) 779–82. Google Scholar

¹⁰ I have had no opportunity of making a personal examination of the manuscript, but the microfilm shows that fols. 119–126 form a separate quire or quires, smaller in size than the surrounding leaves. Google Scholar

¹¹ Cf. note to Abrin. II 31 below. Google Scholar

¹² Cf. nos. 2, 3, 4, 27, 31 and 33. Google Scholar

¹³ Kuttner, , Misc. Mercati , pp. 621–2.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Repertorium 372, Misc. Mercati 617.Google Scholar

¹³ Misc. Mercati 622.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Cf. p. 467 above. Google Scholar

¹⁷ Here I speak of the collections, not of the particular manuscripts, which may have been copied at a later date. We may be pretty sure that the Prague MS, at least, is a ‘fair copy’ of a pre-existent collection. Google Scholar

¹⁸ Cf. below, p. 470. Google Scholar

¹⁹ i.e. so far as these three collections are concerned.Google Scholar

²⁰ Cf. p. 472 and notes to concordance, below, p. 479. Google Scholar

²¹ For the contents of Compilatio IV, see Friedberg's edition, pp. xxxiii-iv, correcting his references to Potthast from 495 to 4195, 1806 to 3663, 1523 to 4523, 4580 to 4577, and adding 2360 (3.3.1), 5022 (2.10.1), 5025 (3.1.1), 4143 (5.14.1), 4379 (4.3.2), 4873 (1.2.4). The following letters which occur in Comp. IV come from the years chiefly covered by Prag. and yet are not found in Prag.: 3360, 3886, 3916, 4143, 4312, 4337, 4360, 4400, 4523, 4587, 4598, 4603, 4628, 4722, 4820, 4847. The ‘core’ of letters of the 12th and 13th years include all in Comp. IV except 3886, 3916, 4143. Google Scholar

²² i.e., Prag. 1, 13, 16, 27, 30, cf. Kuttner, Misc. Mercati 620. Google Scholar

²³ Disregarding no. 32, which is in Comp. III. Google Scholar

²⁴ See below, notes to concordance, p. 475ff. No. 1 is certainly of the twelfth year, no. 11 is of the thirteenth year. Google Scholar

²⁵ For this reason the position of Prag. 28–29 in Abrin. II is to be preferred to its position in the other collections (cf. above, p. 468). Google Scholar

²⁶ Mémoires des pays, villes, comté, et comtes, evesché et evesques … de Beauvais et Beauvaisis (Paris 1617) 285. The source of L'Oisel's copy is not stated.Google Scholar

²⁷ In this connection the disparity between Prag. 1 and the Register may be significant; also the ‘et infra’ inserted in Prag. 10 where there appears to be no gap. Google Scholar

²⁸ This hypothesis does not depend on taking one side or the other in the dispute over the nature of Innocent Ill's registers which Friedrich Bock has recently revived with such force in his ‘Studien zu den Originalregistern Innocenz’ III (Reg. Vat. 4–7A),’ Archiualische Zeitschrift 51 (1955) 329–64. I do not think that Bock's arguments for late composition of the registers, between 1213 and 1215, can stand against the objections of various other ex perts in this field, especially Walther Holtzmann, in Deutsches Archiv 12 (1956) 231–2, Friedrich Kempf, ‘Zu den Originalregistern Innocenz’ III: eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Friedrich Bock,’ Quellen u. Forschungen aus ital. Archiven und Bibliotheken 36 (1956) 86–137, and Othmar Hageneder, ‘Die äusseren Merkmale der Originalregister Innocenz’ III,’ Mitteilungen des Instit. für österreichische Geschichtsforschung 65 (1957) 296–339; but the picture which Bock gives of a chancery cluttered up with drafts and copies may have some bearing on the decretal collections even though it does not explain the genesis of the registers.Google Scholar

²⁹ Cf. Singer, H., ‘Die Dekretalensammlung des Bern. Compostell. ant.,’ Sb. Akad. Wien 171 ii (1914) 24, Kuttner, S., ‘La réserve papale du droit de canonisation,’ RHD⁴ 17 (1938). 198 n. 5, R. von Heckel, ‘Die Dekretalensammlungen des Gilbertus u. Alanus,’ ZRGKan. Abt. 29 (1940) 160, Hageneder, O., loc. cit. 297 and especially Fr. Kempf, Die Register Innocenz III (Misc. Historiae Pontificiae 9 [18]; Rome 1945) 95–101 and ‘Zu den Originalregistern,’ loc. cit. 102–4.Google Scholar

³⁰ Pal. I 15, of 18 August 1212. Part of this letter was dropped before it reached Prag., Abrin. II, and Comp. IV. Google Scholar

³¹ Above, p. 468–9. Google Scholar

³² One of these (no. 4) is part of the celebrated ‘Pastoralis officii,’ already included in Compilatio III and very widely diffused before then as an isolated addition to legal collections. The other (no. 1) is found as an isolated addition to a few decretals of Innocent III in Reims MS 692 (Rainer of Pomposa: see Kuttner, , Repertorium 310). Cf. notes on concordance, below.Google Scholar

³³ See Additional Note, below. Google Scholar

¹ Misc. Mercati 620 n. 14.Google Scholar

² Cf. Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, ed. Cheney, C. R. and Semple, W. H. (London 1953) xxxi, 76.Google Scholar

³ Misc. Mercati 621 n. 5.Google Scholar

⁴ There are no additional words in ep. 59 in the Register at this point (PL 216.251B). Google Scholar

⁵ Cartulaire de Vabbaye cardinalice de la Trinité de Vendôme , ed. Ch. Métais (Paris 1893–97) 3.18.Google Scholar

⁶ Cartulaire de N.-D. de Chartres , ed. E. de Lépinois and Lucien Merlet (Chartres 1862–64) 2.101–2.Google Scholar

⁷ ‘ Alex. III Remensi archiepiscopo.’ App. Conc. Lat. 26.21; Comp. I 3.26.26. It would be easy for the scribe of Abrincensis to write Ro. for Re., for his next letter is addressed to the archbishop of Rouen: moreover, the book is a Norman book.Google Scholar

¹ Printed in Sb. Akad. Wien, 171 ii (1914), under the above title. Google Scholar

² Loc. cit. 114-15.Google Scholar

³ Loc. cit. 3, 29ff.Google Scholar

⁴ The forgery is in the appendix to Tanneriana; Holtzmann, W., ‘Die Dekretalensammlungen des 12. Jhs. 1. Die Sammlung Tanner,’ Festschrift zur Feier des 200 jährigen Bestehens … Akad. Göttingen (1951) 144. Incidentally, the pope's words in condemnation — ‘earn utpote falsam omnino respuamus’ — sound like the sort of thing which Bernard may have heard from his mouth. Cf. Bernard's use of ‘respuatis.’Google Scholar

⁶ Mansi, J. D., Stephani Baluzii … Miscellanea (Lucca 1762) III 391 (cf. Kuttner, Repertorium 306).Google Scholar

⁶ 1.10.1 in the Weingarten text, for which see R. von Heckel, ‘Gilbertus-Alanus,’ ZRG Kan.Abt. 29 (1940) 236; 1.14.1 in the definitive Vercelli text, for which see Kuttner, S., ‘The Collection of Alanus: a Concordance of its Two Recensions,’ Rivista di storia del diritto italiano 26 (1953 [1955]) 39.Google Scholar

⁷ As analyzed by Heyer, F., ZRG Kan.Abt. 4 (1914) 592.Google Scholar

⁸ 1.9.7 in ‘Gilbertus-Alanus’ p. 185. ⁹ Loc. cit. 116. Google Scholar

¹⁰ Cf. Holder, O.-Egger, in MGH, SS. 31.24.Google Scholar

¹¹ Holtzmann, W., ‘Kanonistische Ergänzungen zur Italia Pontificia,’ Quellen u. Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven u. Bibliotheken 38 (1958) 72–73 no. 62.Google Scholar

¹² JL 16589; Kehr, P., Italia Pontificia 3.363 no. 45; Comp. II 4.14.1; × 4.20.3. Cf. Repertorium 345 on the general absence of Innocentian decretals from Comp. II.Google Scholar

¹³ ‘ Kanonistische Ergänzungen …,’ Quellen und Forsch. 37 (1957) 91 no. 39; cf. RHE 50 (1955) 452.Google Scholar

¹⁴ JL 13785; Kehr, Italia Pont. 6.i.312 no. 15; Comp. II 1.8.1; X 1.14.6. Google Scholar

¹⁵ Anhang 62 (Weingarten), 1.11.1 (Vercelli): ‘Gilbertus-Alanus’ 321. Google Scholar

¹⁶ Quellen und Forsch. 38.196 no. 107.Google Scholar

¹⁷ 2.13.8 and Anhang 80 (Weingarten), 2.15.10 (Vercelli): ‘Gilbertus-Alanus’ 253, 326. Printed from Alan in Singer, loc. cit. 116.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Cf. ‘Gilbertus-Alarms’ 170–72 and Kuttner, S., ‘Bernardus Compostellanus Antiquus,’ Traditio 1 (1943) 277–340. Singer observed in favor of no. i that Raymond included it in Extra although he must have known that Bernard had stigmatized it as apocryphal (loc. cit. p. 35). But this is susceptible of more than one explanation. Raymond may have been satisfied that the decretal was a genuine papal letter and not repugnant to the law, even though its ascription to Innocent III had been rejected; and if he wished to include it despite Bernard's caveat, he had no alternative ascription to offer.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Abrinc. II c.9 has no ascription for no. i, but the fact that the collection is otherwise exclusively of Innocentian decretals suggests that this was copied from a text ascribed to Innocent.Google Scholar

²⁰ For Luc. see Heyer, , loc. cit. 588–89 (nos. 109, 111, 112, possibly 110 and 113); for Gilbert and Alan see ‘Gilbertus-Alanus’ passim. Google Scholar

²¹ ‘ Den Höhepunkt der Dekretalensammlungen in textkritischer Beziehung bildet das Breviarium decretalium Bernards von Compostella,’ loc. cit. 608.Google Scholar

²² ‘ Gilbertus-Alanus’ 171–72.Google Scholar