Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:11:07.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medieval Representations: An Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Michal Kobialka
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this special section of Theatre Survey has been to bring together scholars in the field of medieval studies working specifically in theatre studies and those whose work reflects new strategies and current concerns in theatre historiography.

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Middleton, Anne, “Medieval Studies,” Redrawing the Boundaries: The Transformation of English and American Literary Studies, eds. Greenblatt, Stephen and Gunn, Giles (New York: MLA, 1992), 12–40Google Scholar.

2. See, for example, Medievalism and the Modernist Temper, eds. Bloch, R. Howard and Nichols, Stephen G. (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

3. Patterson, Lee, Negotiating the Past: The Historical Understanding of Medieval Literature (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

4. Aers, David, “Rewriting the Middle Ages: Some Suggestions,” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 18:2 (Fall 1988)Google Scholar.

5. Nichols, Stephen G., “The New Medievalism: Tradition and Discontinuity in Medieval Culture,” The New Medievalism, eds. Brownlee, Kevin, Brownlee, Marina, and Nichols, Stephen G. (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

6. de Certeau, Michel, Heterologies: Discourse on the Other (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), 68Google Scholar.

7. Heterologies, 194.