Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T19:11:44.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance and Politics in Process: Practices of Representation in South African Theatre1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Ian Steadman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In many studies of South African theatre, critical scholarship has elucidated the ways in which playwrights have dramatized their views of oppression and struggle under apartheid. As political change in the country in the 1990s determines new developments in cultural expression, theatre in many quarters finds itself no longer thematically bound to the unambiguous morality which characterized anti-apartheid theatre in the 1970s and 1980s. The issues, and the forms and methods used to construct interpretations of the issues in the theatre, appear increasingly more complex in the 1990s. In academic commentary on South African theatre, a moral outrage shared with theatre practitioners against a repugnant social system has frequently blunted critical faculties. Gayatri Spivak warns us that in the writing of history we need to “look at [our] own subjective investment in the narrative that is being produced.“ There is, in South African theatre studies, a great deal of room for critical vigilance when considering “theatre against apartheid.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , November 1992 , pp. 188 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Spivak, Gayatri, The Post-colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues, ed. Harasym, Sarah (New York: Routledge, 1990), 29Google Scholar.

3 Mudimbe, Valentine, The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy and the Order of Knowledge (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

4 Maponya, Maishe, The Hungry Earth, in South African Theatre: Four Plays and an Introduction, eds. Hauptfleisch, Temple and Steadman, Ian (Pretoria: Haum Publishers, 1984), 153Google Scholar.

5 Manaka, Matsemela, Pula (Johannesburg: Skotaville Publishers, 1990)Google Scholar.

6 See, for example, Frederick Johnstone, A., Class, Race and Gold: A Study of Class Relations and Racial Discrimination in South Africa (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976)Google Scholar; and Murray, Colin, “Migrant Labour and Changing Family Structure in the Rural Periphery of Southern Africa,” Journal of Southern African Studies 6 (1980): 139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Wolpe, Harold, “A Comment on ‘The Poverty of Neo-Marxism,’” Journal of Southern African Studies 4 (1978): 240–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar; quotation from 245.

8 All quotations come from the 1990 text (see note 5 above). Pula was also published in Market Plays, ed. Gray, Stephen (Johannesburg: Ad. Donker, 1986)Google Scholar.

9 Grotowski, Jerzy, Towards a Poor Theatre (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968)Google Scholar.

10 manaka, Matsemela, “The Actor is the key,” (interview), The Voice (Johannesburg) 21–27 May 1980Google Scholar.

11 Manaka, Matsemela, “The Babalaz People,” Staffrider (Johannesburg), November 1981, 34Google Scholar.

12 Manaka, Matsemela, “Some Thoughts on Black Theatre,” The English Academy Review 2 (1984): 33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 The Star (Johannesburg), 15 August 1980.

14 Manaka, Matsemela, Interview, Financial Mail (Johannesburg), 14 December 1979Google Scholar; and his “Theatre of the Dispossessed,” Staffrider (Johannesburg), September/October 1980, 29–30Google Scholar.

15 Sole, Kelwyn, “Culture, Politics, and the Black Writer: a Critical Look at Prevailing Assumptions,” English in Africa 10 (1983): 37–84Google Scholar.

16 Manaka, , Interview, Financial Mail (Johannesburg), 14 December 1979Google Scholar.

17 “Soyikwa African Theatre,” The Scotsman, 31 August 1983.

18 Manaka, “The Actor is the Key.”

19 Manaka, , letter to The Star (Johannesburg), 15 October 1980Google Scholar.

20 Manaka, “The Actor is the Key.”

21 Manaka, “Theatre of the Dispossessed.”

22 Ibid.

23 Cited in Sowetan (Johannesburg), 16 March 1984Google Scholar.

24 Manaka, letter to The Star, note 19 above.

25 Sunday Post (Johannesburg), 4 July 1980Google Scholar.

26 Kelwyn Sole, “Culture, Politics, and the Black Writer,” 50.

27 Tomaselli, Keyan, “The Semiotics of Alternative Theatre in South Africa,” Critical Arts 2 (1981): 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Sole, Kelwyn, “Black literature and Performance: Some Notes on Class and Populism,” South African Labour Bulletin 9 (1984): 70Google Scholar.

29 Hirson, Baruch, Year of Fire, Year of Ash (London: Zed Press, 1979)Google Scholar.

30 Rathbone, Richard, “Review Article: The People and Soweto,” Journal of Southern African Studies 6 (1979): 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Mudimbe, , The Invention Of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy and the Order of Knowledge. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

32 Fuchs, Anne, Playing the Market: The Market Theatre, Johannesburg, 1976–1986 (Chur. Harwood Academic Publishers, 1990)Google Scholar.

33 South African Theatre, note 4 above.

34 Larlham, Peter, “The Impact of the Dismantling of Apartheid on Theatre in South Africa,” unpublished paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Theatre Research, Seattle, Washington, 16 November 1991Google Scholar.